llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Meta model product

Muse Spark 1.1

1 is Meta Superintelligence Labs' multimodal reasoning model for agentic tasks, supporting tool and computer use, coding, and multimodal understanding.

Updated Oct 23, 2026. Default version: Muse Spark 1.1

LLMBoard Score82.6Muse Spark 1.1
Coverage80%11 benchmark families
Context window1MTokens
Official input price$1.25Meta API

On this page

  • Capability
  • Benchmarks
  • Arena
  • Pricing
  • Runtime
  • Specification
  • Versions
  • Similar models
  • About
  • FAQ

Muse Spark 1.1 Capability Profile

This profile uses the model's current scored version. Arena ratings and prices are shown separately.

Muse Spark 1.1 LLMBoard score breakdown

Muse Spark 1.1 Benchmark Results

Benchmark scores for Muse Spark 1.1.

30 of 36 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Benchmark
Score
Rank
Participants
Percentile
Evidence
Evaluated
BenchmarkMCP AtlasScore88.10%Rank02Participants39Percentile97.37%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkToolathlonScore75.60%Rank02Participants42Percentile97.56%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkFinance Agent v2Score57.20%Rank04Participants29Percentile89.29%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkHumanity's Last ExamScore62.10%Rank06Participants109Percentile95.37%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkJob BenchScore54.70%Rank06Participants9Percentile37.50%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkBabyVisionScore76.30%Rank07Participants16Percentile60.00%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkAA SciCode SubtasksScore58.80%Rank07Participants89Percentile93.18%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkOSWorld-VerifiedScore80.80%Rank08Participants28Percentile74.07%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Document Style ControlScore1,479.46 ratingRank09Participants38Percentile78.38%EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
BenchmarkCharXiv-RScore88.40%Rank11Participants60Percentile83.05%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Text Style ControlScore1,490.43 ratingRank11Participants218Percentile95.39%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkAA HLE Text No ToolsScore46.20%Rank12Participants200Percentile94.47%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkAA Omniscience AccuracyScore52.05%Rank13Participants201Percentile94.00%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkLiveBench reasoning (2026-06-25)Score87.73 scoreRank14Participants43Percentile69.05%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkLM Arena DocumentScore1,464.70 ratingRank15Participants38Percentile62.16%EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena TextScore1,478.32 ratingRank18Participants218Percentile92.17%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkSWE-Bench ProScore61.50%Rank20Participants63Percentile69.35%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena VisionScore1,292.50 ratingRank21Participants113Percentile82.14%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 19, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Vision Style ControlScore1,280.01 ratingRank21Participants113Percentile82.14%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 19, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent Tool HallucinationScore0.21%Rank23Participants44Percentile48.84%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 2.1Score80.00%Rank24Participants48Percentile51.06%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkLiveBench instruction (2026-06-25)Score69.64 scoreRank24Participants43Percentile45.24%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkAA CritPtScore15.14%Rank25Participants200Percentile87.94%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkLiveBench math (2026-06-25)Score87.14 scoreRank28Participants43Percentile35.71%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent Task Outcome ExplicitScore-5.50%Rank29Participants44Percentile34.88%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent Bash ReliabilityScore-1.84%Rank30Participants44Percentile32.56%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent Bash Recovery StepsScore-2.26%Rank32Participants44Percentile27.91%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 8, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena WebdevScore1,542.41 ratingRank32Participants107Percentile70.75%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 19, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Text FactualityScore1,462.30 ratingRank34Participants131Percentile74.62%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent LeaderboardScore-6.60%Rank35Participants44Percentile20.93%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026

Muse Spark 1.1 Arena Results

Preference and agent-evaluation results for the default version.

30 of 100 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Arena
Category
Rank
Rating / score
Votes
Observations
Result date
Arenatext style controlCategorypolishRank03Rating / score1,510.83Votes671ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenatextCategorypolishRank06Rating / score1,498.69Votes671ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategorykoreanRank06Rating / score1,475.27Votes826ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryfrenchRank08Rating / score1,512.63Votes1,533ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryindustry business and management and financial operationsRank08Rating / score1,491.15Votes8,494ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenadocument style controlCategoryoverallRank09Rating / score1,479.46Votes4,885ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 13, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryexclude tiesRank10Rating / score1,505.78Votes33,185ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryindustry software and it servicesRank10Rating / score1,524.81Votes17,321ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategorykoreanRank11Rating / score1,440.14Votes406ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategorynon englishRank11Rating / score1,483.24Votes26,699ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryoverallRank11Rating / score1,490.43Votes44,815ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategorymulti turnRank12Rating / score1,495.59Votes6,815ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryhard promptsRank14Rating / score1,510.29Votes29,563ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenadocumentCategoryoverallRank15Rating / score1,464.70Votes4,885ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 13, 2026
ArenatextCategoryindustry business and management and financial operationsRank15Rating / score1,470.37Votes8,494ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenatextCategorykoreanRank15Rating / score1,458.72Votes826ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryjapaneseRank15Rating / score1,443.23Votes403ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategorycodingRank15Rating / score1,532.98Votes12,370ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryindustry legal and governmentRank15Rating / score1,497.04Votes3,853ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenavision style controlCategorychineseRank15Rating / score1,335.46Votes767ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 19, 2026
ArenatextCategorymulti turnRank16Rating / score1,483.76Votes6,815ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryindustry mathematicalRank16Rating / score1,500.82Votes2,577ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryrussianRank16Rating / score1,494.10Votes5,290ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenavision style controlCategoryhumorRank16Rating / score1,274.92Votes577ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 19, 2026
ArenatextCategoryindustry software and it servicesRank17Rating / score1,497.87Votes17,321ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryenglishRank17Rating / score1,490.11Votes18,114ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryindustry life and physical and social scienceRank17Rating / score1,502.27Votes7,539ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryindustry medicine and healthcareRank17Rating / score1,499.74Votes3,270ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenavisionCategoryhumorRank17Rating / score1,288.50Votes577ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 19, 2026
ArenatextCategoryexclude tiesRank18Rating / score1,486.08Votes33,185ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026

Muse Spark 1.1 Pricing

Official vendor API pricing appears first, followed by individual provider offers.

Official API
$1.25 input, $4.25 output per 1M
Official provider
Meta
Lowest third-party
From $1.25 input, $4.25 output per 1M via OrcaRouter
Tracked offerings
17
17 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Provider
Provider model ID
Region
Input / 1M
Output / 1M
Context
Updated
ProviderOrcaRouterProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderNanoGPTProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderMetaProvider model IDmuse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderOpenRouterProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderLLM GatewayProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderMerge GatewayProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderEmpirioLabs AIProvider model IDmuse-spark-1-1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderVercel AI GatewayProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderDevPass (LLM Gateway)Provider model IDmuse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderKilo GatewayProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderPioneerProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderAbacusProvider model IDmuse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderCloudflare AI GatewayProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderCommandCodeProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderEden AIProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.25Output / 1M$4.25Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderAI/ML APIProvider model IDmeta/muse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.32Output / 1M$4.5Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderAIHubMixProvider model IDmuse-spark-1.1RegionglobalInput / 1M$1.38Output / 1M$4.68Context1MUpdatedOct 23, 2026

Muse Spark 1.1 Runtime Performance

Provider-specific output speed and catalog latency for Muse Spark 1.1. Runtime does not affect the capability score.

1 row
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Provider
Output Speed
Catalog Latency
Max Input
Max Output
Updated
ProviderMeta Model APIOutput Speed73.08 tok/sCatalog Latency2.73 sMax Input1MMax Output131.1KUpdatedOct 23, 2026

Output Speed is generated output tokens received per second. Catalog latency is reported separately from observed provider TTFT.

Muse Spark 1.1 Specifications

Technical details for the model's default version.

Version
Muse Spark 1.1
Released
Jul 9, 2026
Knowledge cutoff
Unknown
Parameters
N/A
Context window
1M
Max output
131.1K
Inputs
image, text, video
Outputs
text
Open weights
No
License
Proprietary

Muse Spark 1.1 Versions

Available versions of this model. The score column identifies the version used in the overall ranking.

1 row
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Version
Released
LLMBoard
Parameters
Context
Max output
Open weights
License
VersionMuse Spark 1.1ReleasedJul 9, 2026LLMBoard82.61ParametersN/AContext1MMax output131.1KOpen weightsNoLicenseProprietary

Models similar to Muse Spark 1.1

Recommendations prioritize the same model type and family, then the closest LLMBoard score.

#15+0.85
ME

Muse Wonder Full

Meta

83.46 LLMBoard

Details
#35-4.65
ME

Muse Wonder

Meta

77.96 LLMBoard

Details
#9+6.34
ME

Muse Spark 1.3

Meta

88.95 LLMBoard

Details
#39-6.41
ME

Muse Spark 1.2

Meta

76.20 LLMBoard

Details
#46-7.75
ME

Muse Spark Open

Meta

74.86 LLMBoard

Details
#59-11.41
ME

Muse Spark

Meta

71.20 LLMBoard

Details

What is Muse Spark 1.1?

Key information about Muse Spark 1.1 and its available data.

1 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta Superintelligence Labs. The Meta Model API supports text, image, PDF, and video inputs, up to 131,072 output tokens, structured output, parallel tool calling, built-in web search with citations, and a 1,048,576-token context window.

Data as of 2026-10-22.

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.1.

When was Muse Spark 1.1 released?

Muse Spark 1.1's default version was released on Jul 9, 2026.

How much does Muse Spark 1.1 cost?

Muse Spark 1.1's official API price is $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens via Meta. The lowest tracked third-party offer starts at $1.25 input and $4.25 output via OrcaRouter.

Who created Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 was created by Meta.

What is the context window for Muse Spark 1.1?

The default version has a 1M token context window.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 open weight?

No. The default version is not marked as having publicly available weights.

How many API providers offer Muse Spark 1.1?

Official prices use only the vendor's configured official Provider and positive standard USD PAYG rates. Third-party offers remain explicitly labeled.

17 provider offerings are linked to the default version.