llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

math benchmark

MATH Leaderboard

MATH is a dataset of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions.

Updated Sep 6, 2026

Models71
Model coverage71
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MATH Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 71 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPo3-miniOpenAIScore97.90%Percentile100.00%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelOPo1OpenAIScore96.40%Percentile98.57%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMAMiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512)Mistral AIScore90.40%Percentile97.14%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelMAMistral Large 3Mistral AIScore90.40%Percentile95.71%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelGOGemini 2.0 FlashGoogleScore89.70%Percentile94.29%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelMAKimi K2 0905Moonshot AIScore89.10%Percentile92.86%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelGOGemma 3 27BGoogleScore89.00%Percentile91.43%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelMAMinistral 3 (8B Instruct 2512)Mistral AIScore87.60%Percentile90.00%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelGOGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGoogleScore86.80%Percentile88.57%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelGOGemini 1.5 ProGoogleScore86.50%Percentile87.14%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelXIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiScore86.20%Percentile85.71%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelOPo1-previewOpenAIScore85.50%Percentile84.29%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-5OpenAIScore84.70%Percentile82.86%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelGOGemma 3 12BGoogleScore83.80%Percentile81.43%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelACQwen2.5 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore83.10%Percentile80.00%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelACQwen2.5 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore83.10%Percentile78.57%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelMAMinistral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)Mistral AIScore83.00%Percentile77.14%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelACQwen2.5 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.20%Percentile75.71%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelMIPhi 4MicrosoftScore80.40%Percentile74.29%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelACQwen2.5 14B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore80.00%Percentile72.86%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelANClaude 3.5 SonnetAnthropicScore78.30%Percentile71.43%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelGOGemini 1.5 FlashGoogleScore77.90%Percentile70.00%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelMELlama 3.3 70B InstructMetaScore77.00%Percentile68.57%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelOPGPT-4oOpenAIScore76.60%Percentile67.14%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelAMNova ProAmazonScore76.60%Percentile65.71%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelXAGrok-2xAIScore76.10%Percentile64.29%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelGOGemma 3 4BGoogleScore75.60%Percentile62.86%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelACQwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore75.50%Percentile61.43%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank29ModelDEDeepSeek-V2.5DeepSeekScore74.70%Percentile60.00%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank30ModelMELlama 3.1 405B InstructMetaScore73.80%Percentile58.57%Participants71EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MATH Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MATH Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MATH

The Top AI Models for MATH

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MATH?

What MATH measures and how its scores work.

MATH is a mathematics benchmark dataset with problems spanning difficulty levels 1-5 and seven subjects: Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.

MATH reports Score as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MATH
Modality
text
Primary category
math
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MATH.

Which model scores highest on MATH?

o3-mini is currently ranked first with 97.90%.

What are the top three models on MATH?

The current leaders are o3-mini (97.90%), o1 (96.40%), and MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) (90.40%).

Which MATH model has the lowest official input price?

Nova Micro has the lowest matched official input price at $0.04 input / $0.14 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MATH results?

The fastest matched records are Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (2,220.00 tok/s via Cerebras), Llama 4 Scout (776.10 tok/s via Groq), and Llama 4 Maverick (307.30 tok/s via Groq).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MATH measure?

MATH reports Score as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

71 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1o3-mini97.90%
Rank #2o196.40%
Rank #3MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512)90.40%
Rank #4Mistral Large 390.40%

Ranking basisThis math AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    o3-miniOpenAI
    Score
    97.90%
    Price
    $1.1 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 115.00 tok/s via Azure

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 71 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MATH, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    o1OpenAI
    Score
    96.40%
    Price
    $15 input / $60 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 66.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 71 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MATH, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MA
    Mistral AI
    Score
    90.40%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.10 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 71 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MATH, not total model capability
  4. 04
    MA
    Mistral AI
    Score
    90.40%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 71 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MATH, not total model capability
  5. 05
    GO
    Google
    Score
    89.70%
    Speed
    Up to 183.00 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 71 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MATH, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MATH

o3-mini currently leads MATH with 97.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512)
Mistral Large 3
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Benchmark rank #1o3-mini97.90% · $1.1 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2o196.40% · $15 input / $60 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512)90.40% · $0.10 input / $0.10 output per 1M tokens