Google model product
0 Flash and optimized for cost efficiency and low latency.
Updated Sep 8, 2026. Default version: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
This profile uses the model's current scored version. Arena ratings and prices are shown separately.
Benchmark scores for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.
Benchmark | Score | Rank | Participants | Percentile | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| BenchmarkBird-SQL (dev) | Score57.40% | Rank01 | Participants9 | Percentile100.00% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkHiddenMath | Score55.30% | Rank03 | Participants13 | Percentile83.33% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkCoVoST2 | Score38.40% | Rank04 | Participants4 | Percentile0.00% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMRCR 1M | Score58.00% | Rank04 | Participants4 | Percentile0.00% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkFACTS Grounding | Score83.60% | Rank05 | Participants13 | Percentile66.67% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkLiveCodeBench v5 | Score28.90% | Rank05 | Participants9 | Percentile50.00% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkGlobal-MMLU-Lite | Score78.20% | Rank06 | Participants15 | Percentile64.29% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkEgoSchema | Score67.20% | Rank08 | Participants9 | Percentile12.50% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMATH | Score86.80% | Rank09 | Participants71 | Percentile88.57% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkSimpleQA | Score21.70% | Rank35 | Participants47 | Percentile26.09% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMMMU | Score68.00% | Rank37 | Participants64 | Percentile42.86% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkLM Arena Vision Style Control | Score1,136.18 rating | Rank85 | Participants107 | Percentile20.75% | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMMLU-Pro | Score71.60% | Rank86 | Participants138 | Percentile37.96% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkLM Arena Vision | Score1,100.42 rating | Rank89 | Participants107 | Percentile16.98% | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkLM Arena Text Style Control | Score1,353.33 rating | Rank141 | Participants210 | Percentile33.01% | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkLM Arena Text | Score1,329.36 rating | Rank149 | Participants210 | Percentile29.19% | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkGPQA | Score51.50% | Rank185 | Participants247 | Percentile25.20% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
Preference and agent-evaluation results for the default version.
Arena | Category | Rank | Rating / score | Votes | Observations | Result date |
|---|
| Arenavision style control | Categoryenglish | Rank83 | Rating / score1,150.06 | Votes2,252 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenavision style control | Categorychinese | Rank84 | Rating / score1,078.73 | Votes98 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenavision | Categorychinese | Rank85 | Rating / score1,025.35 | Votes98 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenavision style control | Categoryoverall | Rank85 | Rating / score1,136.18 | Votes3,991 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenavision | Categoryenglish | Rank87 | Rating / score1,120.83 | Votes2,252 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenavision | Categoryoverall | Rank89 | Rating / score1,100.42 | Votes3,991 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categorykorean | Rank99 | Rating / score1,343.28 | Votes353 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categorykorean | Rank102 | Rating / score1,325.12 | Votes353 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categoryjapanese | Rank106 | Rating / score1,301.68 | Votes542 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categoryjapanese | Rank107 | Rating / score1,319.40 | Votes542 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categorycreative writing | Rank125 | Rating / score1,344.21 | Votes4,104 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categoryfrench | Rank126 | Rating / score1,376.13 | Votes253 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categoryfrench | Rank127 | Rating / score1,346.99 | Votes253 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categorycreative writing | Rank130 | Rating / score1,318.80 | Votes4,104 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categorygerman | Rank130 | Rating / score1,329.29 | Votes627 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categoryindustry writing and literature and language | Rank131 | Rating / score1,346.95 | Votes6,681 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categorygerman | Rank132 | Rating / score1,305.36 | Votes627 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categoryindustry business and management and financial operations | Rank134 | Rating / score1,358.18 | Votes2,418 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categoryindustry legal and government | Rank134 | Rating / score1,380.77 | Votes1,435 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categorynon english | Rank134 | Rating / score1,346.03 | Votes10,064 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categoryindustry entertainment and sports and media | Rank135 | Rating / score1,326.44 | Votes4,510 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categoryindustry writing and literature and language | Rank136 | Rating / score1,321.22 | Votes6,681 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categoryspanish | Rank136 | Rating / score1,312.70 | Votes157 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categoryindustry business and management and financial operations | Rank137 | Rating / score1,334.42 | Votes2,418 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categorynon english | Rank137 | Rating / score1,322.35 | Votes10,064 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categoryrussian | Rank137 | Rating / score1,351.34 | Votes2,296 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categoryrussian | Rank139 | Rating / score1,326.72 | Votes2,296 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categoryindustry medicine and healthcare | Rank139 | Rating / score1,373.37 | Votes1,055 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext | Categoryindustry medicine and healthcare | Rank140 | Rating / score1,345.07 | Votes1,055 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
| Arenatext style control | Categoryspanish | Rank140 | Rating / score1,337.53 | Votes157 | ObservationsN/A | Result date |
Official vendor API pricing appears first, followed by individual provider offers.
Provider | Provider model ID | Region | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Context | Updated |
|---|
| ProviderPoe | Provider model IDgoogle/gemini-2.0-flash-lite | Regionglobal | Input / 1M$0.052 | Output / 1M$0.21 | Context990K | Updated |
| Provider302.AI | Provider model IDgemini-2.0-flash-lite | Regionglobal | Input / 1M$0.075 | Output / 1M$0.30 | Context2M | Updated |
Official prices use only the vendor's configured official Provider and positive standard USD PAYG rates. Third-party offers remain explicitly labeled.
Provider-specific output speed and catalog latency for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite. Runtime does not affect the capability score.
Provider | Output Speed | Catalog Latency | Max Input | Max Output | Updated |
|---|
| ProviderGoogle | Output Speed85.00 tok/s | Catalog Latency0.70 s | Max Input1M | Max Output8.2K | Updated |
Output Speed is generated output tokens received per second. Catalog latency is reported separately from observed provider TTFT.
Technical details for the model's default version.
Available versions of this model. The score column identifies the version used in the overall ranking.
Version | Released | LLMBoard | Parameters | Context | Max output | Open weights | License |
|---|
| VersionGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Released | LLMBoard20.10 | ParametersN/A | Context1M | Max output8.2K | Open weightsNo | LicenseProprietary |
Recommendations prioritize the same model type and family, then the closest LLMBoard score.
Key information about Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite and its available data.
0 Flash Lite is a large language model from Google. 0 Flash and optimized for cost efficiency and low latency.
Data as of 2026-09-08.
Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite's default version was released on Feb 5, 2025.
No official standard PAYG price is currently available for Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite. The lowest tracked third-party offer starts at $0.052 input and $0.21 output via Poe.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created by Google.
The default version has a 1M token context window.
No. The default version is not marked as having publicly available weights.
3 provider offerings are linked to the default version.