llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

MMMU Leaderboard

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models64
Model coverage64
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MMMU Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 64 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore86.00%Percentile100.00%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-5.1OpenAIScore85.40%Percentile98.41%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.1 InstantOpenAIScore85.40%Percentile96.83%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelOPGPT-5.1 ThinkingOpenAIScore85.40%Percentile95.24%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelOPGPT-5OpenAIScore84.20%Percentile93.65%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore83.90%Percentile92.06%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelOPo3OpenAIScore82.90%Percentile90.48%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.90%Percentile88.89%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.30%Percentile87.30%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelGOGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GoogleScore82.00%Percentile85.71%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore81.70%Percentile84.13%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelOPo4-miniOpenAIScore81.60%Percentile82.54%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore81.40%Percentile80.95%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelGOGemini 2.5 FlashGoogleScore79.70%Percentile79.37%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelGOGemini 2.5 ProGoogleScore79.60%Percentile77.78%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelLAEXAONE 4.5 33BLG AI ResearchScore78.70%Percentile76.19%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelSTStep3-VL-10BStepFunScore78.10%Percentile74.60%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelXAGrok-3xAIScore78.00%Percentile73.02%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelOPo1OpenAIScore77.60%Percentile71.43%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelGOGemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingGoogleScore75.40%Percentile69.84%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelOPGPT-4.5OpenAIScore75.20%Percentile68.25%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelCOCommand A+CohereScore75.10%Percentile66.67%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelANClaude 3.7 SonnetAnthropicScore75.00%Percentile65.08%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelOPGPT-4.1OpenAIScore74.80%Percentile63.49%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelANClaude Sonnet 4AnthropicScore74.40%Percentile61.90%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelMELlama 4 MaverickMetaScore73.40%Percentile60.32%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelGOGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogleScore72.90%Percentile58.73%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelOPGPT-4.1 miniOpenAIScore72.70%Percentile57.14%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank29ModelOPGPT-4oOpenAIScore72.20%Percentile55.56%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank30ModelGOGemini 2.0 FlashGoogleScore70.70%Percentile53.97%Participants64EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MMMU Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MMMU Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MMMU

The Top AI Models for MMMU

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MMMU?

What MMMU measures and how its scores work.

MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark containing 11.5K multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks across six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering.

It measures multimodal models' college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning using Score, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MMMU
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MMMU.

Which model scores highest on MMMU?

Qwen3.6 Plus is currently ranked first with 86.00%.

What are the top three models on MMMU?

The current leaders are Qwen3.6 Plus (86.00%), GPT-5.1 (85.40%), and GPT-5.1 Instant (85.40%).

Which MMMU model has the lowest official input price?

Nova Lite has the lowest matched official input price at $0.06 input / $0.24 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MMMU results?

The fastest matched records are Llama 4 Scout (776.10 tok/s via Groq), GPT-4.1 mini (467.39 tok/s via OpenAI), and Llama 4 Maverick (307.30 tok/s via Groq).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MMMU measure?

It measures multimodal models' college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning using Score, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

64 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen3.6 Plus86.00%
Rank #2GPT-5.185.40%
Rank #3GPT-5.1 Instant85.40%
Rank #4GPT-5.1 Thinking85.40%

Ranking basisThis mmmu AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    86.00%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 64 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-5.1OpenAI
    Score
    85.40%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 64 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    85.40%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 64 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU, not total model capability
  4. 04
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    85.40%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 80.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 64 compared models
    • 95th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU, not total model capability
  5. 05
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    84.20%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 64 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MMMU

Qwen3.6 Plus currently leads MMMU with 86.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.1 Instant
GPT-5.1 Thinking
GPT-5
Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.6 Plus86.00% · $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2GPT-5.185.40% · $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.1 Instant85.40% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI