llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

MMMU-Pro Leaderboard

MMMU-Pro is a multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU by filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models73
Model coverage73
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MMMU-Pro Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 73 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-6.1 SolOpenAIScore85.95%Percentile100.00%Participants73EvidenceBEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelGOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogleScore83.60%Percentile98.61%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIScore83.20%Percentile97.22%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore83.00%Percentile95.83%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank05ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore82.70%Percentile94.44%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.30%Percentile93.06%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank07ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore82.20%Percentile91.67%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank08ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore81.60%Percentile90.28%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank09ModelGOGemini 3 FlashGoogleScore81.20%Percentile88.89%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank10ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIScore81.20%Percentile87.50%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank11ModelGOGemini 3 ProGoogleScore81.00%Percentile86.11%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank12ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore80.70%Percentile84.72%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank13ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleScore80.50%Percentile83.33%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank14ModelMEMuse SparkMetaScore80.40%Percentile81.94%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank15ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore80.10%Percentile80.56%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank16ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIScore79.50%Percentile79.17%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank17ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore79.00%Percentile77.78%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank18ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore78.80%Percentile76.39%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank19ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore78.50%Percentile75.00%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank20ModelOPGPT-5OpenAIScore78.40%Percentile73.61%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank21ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore78.40%Percentile72.22%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank22ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore78.10%Percentile70.83%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank23ModelXIMiMo-V2.5XiaomiScore77.90%Percentile69.44%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank24ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore77.30%Percentile68.06%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank25ModelGOGemma 4 31BGoogleScore76.90%Percentile66.67%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank26ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore76.90%Percentile65.28%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank27ModelGOGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogleScore76.80%Percentile63.89%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank28ModelOPGPT-5.4 miniOpenAIScore76.60%Percentile62.50%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank29ModelOPo3OpenAIScore76.40%Percentile61.11%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank30ModelOPGPT-5.5 InstantOpenAIScore76.00%Percentile59.72%Participants73EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

MMMU-Pro Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MMMU-Pro Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MMMU-Pro

The Top AI Models for MMMU-Pro

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MMMU-Pro?

What MMMU-Pro measures and how its scores work.

MMMU-Pro is a multimodal benchmark for evaluating multi-discipline understanding and extends MMMU through a three-step process.

It measures multimodal understanding performance using Score, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MMMU-Pro
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MMMU-Pro.

Which model scores highest on MMMU-Pro?

GPT-6.1 Sol is currently ranked first with 85.95%.

What are the top three models on MMMU-Pro?

The current leaders are GPT-6.1 Sol (85.95%), Gemini 3.5 Flash (83.60%), and GPT-5.5 (83.20%).

Which MMMU-Pro model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MMMU-Pro results?

The fastest matched records are Llama 4 Maverick (638.70 tok/s via Sambanova), GPT-5.6 Luna (215.52 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-4o (132.00 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MMMU-Pro measure?

It measures multimodal understanding performance using Score, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

73 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-6.1 Sol85.95%
Rank #2Gemini 3.5 Flash83.60%
Rank #3GPT-5.583.20%
Rank #4GPT-5.6 Sol83.00%

Ranking basisThis mmmu-pro AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Score
    85.95%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 73 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU-Pro, not total model capability
  2. 02
    GO
    Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
    Score
    83.60%
    Price
    $1.5 input / $9.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 73 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU-Pro, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    83.20%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 73 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU-Pro, not total model capability
  4. 04
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    83.00%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 25.46 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 73 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU-Pro, not total model capability
  5. 05
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    82.70%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 73 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMMU-Pro, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MMMU-Pro

GPT-6.1 Sol currently leads MMMU-Pro with 85.95%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.5
GPT-5.6 Sol
Seed 2.1 Pro
Benchmark rank #1GPT-6.1 Sol85.95% · $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Gemini 3.5 Flash83.60% · $1.5 input / $9.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.583.20% · $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens