llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

language benchmark

MMLU-Pro Leaderboard

MMLU-Pro is a multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU with 10 multiple-choice options, over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains, and reasoning-intensive tasks.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models100
Model coverage138
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MMLU-Pro Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 100 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelSASakana NamazuSakana AIScore90.33%Percentile100.00%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore89.60%Percentile99.27%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore88.50%Percentile98.54%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore88.50%Percentile97.81%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelMIMiniMax M2.1MiniMaxScore88.00%Percentile97.08%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore87.80%Percentile96.35%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeekScore87.50%Percentile95.62%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore87.10%Percentile94.89%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelBAERNIE 5.0BaiduScore87.00%Percentile94.16%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelNVNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)NVIDIAScore86.80%Percentile93.43%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore86.70%Percentile92.70%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423DeepSeekScore86.40%Percentile91.97%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelUPSolar Pro 4UpstageScore86.30%Percentile91.24%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxDeepSeekScore86.20%Percentile90.51%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore86.20%Percentile89.78%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore86.10%Percentile89.05%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore85.30%Percentile88.32%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelGOGemma 4 31BGoogleScore85.20%Percentile87.59%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore85.20%Percentile86.86%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelDEDeepSeek-R1-0528DeepSeekScore85.00%Percentile86.13%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelDEDeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)DeepSeekScore85.00%Percentile85.40%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelDEDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDeepSeekScore85.00%Percentile84.67%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelDEDeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeekScore85.00%Percentile83.94%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelMIMAI-Thinking-1MicrosoftScore85.00%Percentile83.21%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelXIMiMo-V2-FlashXiaomiScore84.90%Percentile82.48%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelZAGLM-4.5Zhipu AIScore84.60%Percentile81.75%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelMAKimi K2-Thinking-0905Moonshot AIScore84.60%Percentile81.02%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelACQwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore84.40%Percentile80.29%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank29ModelZAGLM-4.7Zhipu AIScore84.30%Percentile79.56%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank30ModelLAK-EXAONE-236B-A23BLG AI ResearchScore83.80%Percentile78.83%Participants138EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MMLU-Pro Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MMLU-Pro Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MMLU-Pro

The Top AI Models for MMLU-Pro

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MMLU-Pro?

What MMLU-Pro measures and how its scores work.

MMLU-Pro is a language benchmark extending MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10 and eliminating trivial questions.

It reports Score as a ratio for performance on questions across 14 domains.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MMLU-Pro
Modality
text
Primary category
language
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MMLU-Pro.

Which model scores highest on MMLU-Pro?

Sakana Namazu is currently ranked first with 90.33%.

What are the top three models on MMLU-Pro?

The current leaders are Sakana Namazu (90.33%), Qwen3.7 Max (89.60%), and Qwen3.6 Plus (88.50%).

Which MMLU-Pro model has the lowest official input price?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has the lowest matched official input price at $0.13 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MMLU-Pro results?

The fastest matched records are Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (2,220.00 tok/s via Cerebras), Llama 4 Scout (776.10 tok/s via Groq), and Llama 4 Maverick (307.30 tok/s via Groq).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MMLU-Pro measure?

It reports Score as a ratio for performance on questions across 14 domains.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

100 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Sakana Namazu90.33%
Rank #2Qwen3.7 Max89.60%
Rank #3Qwen3.6 Plus88.50%
Rank #4Qwen3.7-Plus88.50%

Ranking basisThis mmlu-pro AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    SA
    Sakana NamazuSakana AI
    Score
    90.33%
    Price
    $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 138 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMLU-Pro, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    89.60%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 138 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMLU-Pro, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    88.50%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 138 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMLU-Pro, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    88.50%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 138 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMLU-Pro, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MI
    MiniMax
    Score
    88.00%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via MiniMax

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 138 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMLU-Pro, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MMLU-Pro

Sakana Namazu currently leads MMLU-Pro with 90.33%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.7-Plus
MiniMax M2.1
Benchmark rank #1Sakana Namazu90.33% · $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Qwen3.7 Max89.60% · $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.6 Plus88.50% · $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens