llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Upstage model product

Solar Pro 4

A reasoning-focused agentic text-to-text LLM from Upstage for multi-step tasks.

Updated Oct 23, 2026. Default version: Solar Pro 4

LLMBoard Score55.1Solar Pro 4
Coverage60%9 benchmark families
Context window524.3KTokens
Official input price$0.30Upstage API

On this page

  • Capability
  • Benchmarks
  • Arena
  • Pricing
  • Runtime
  • Specification
  • Versions
  • Similar models
  • About
  • FAQ

Solar Pro 4 Capability Profile

This profile uses the model's current scored version. Arena ratings and prices are shown separately.

Solar Pro 4 LLMBoard score breakdown

Solar Pro 4 Benchmark Results

Benchmark scores for Solar Pro 4.

27 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Benchmark
Score
Rank
Participants
Percentile
Evidence
Evaluated
BenchmarkLiveCodeBenchScore87.80%Rank05Participants76Percentile94.67%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkAA-LCRScore71.00%Rank07Participants27Percentile76.92%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkAIME 2026Score95.30%Rank09Participants27Percentile69.23%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkTau3 BankingScore23.00%Rank09Participants16Percentile46.67%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkMMLU-ProScore86.30%Rank13Participants142Percentile91.49%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkGPQAScore89.00%Rank37Participants256Percentile85.88%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 2.1Score57.00%Rank39Participants48Percentile19.15%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent Tool HallucinationScore-2.44%Rank40Participants44Percentile9.30%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent SteerabilityScore-14.53%Rank41Participants44Percentile6.98%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent Praise ComplaintScore-21.26%Rank42Participants44Percentile4.65%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent LeaderboardScore-19.61%Rank44Participants44Percentile0.00%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent Bash Recovery StepsScore-25.56%Rank44Participants44Percentile0.00%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 8, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent Task Outcome ExplicitScore-27.77%Rank44Participants44Percentile0.00%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkAA GPQA DiamondScore89.09%Rank44Participants199Percentile78.28%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent Bash ReliabilityScore-44.51%Rank44Participants44Percentile0.00%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Agent Bash Reliability No PrereqScore-51.51%Rank45Participants45Percentile0.00%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 14, 2026
BenchmarkAA CritPtScore5.43%Rank48Participants200Percentile76.38%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkAA SciCode SubtasksScore44.56%Rank49Participants89Percentile45.45%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkAA HLE Text No ToolsScore29.24%Rank53Participants200Percentile73.87%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkBrowseCompScore49.20%Rank56Participants70Percentile20.29%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkAA LCR v1.1Score74.00%Rank67Participants193Percentile65.63%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
BenchmarkSWE-Bench VerifiedScore70.60%Rank68Participants120Percentile43.70%EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena WebdevScore1,370.68 ratingRank78Participants107Percentile27.36%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 19, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Text FactualityScore1,413.15 ratingRank109Participants131Percentile16.92%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena TextScore1,387.91 ratingRank121Participants218Percentile44.70%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Text Style ControlScore1,387.60 ratingRank132Participants218Percentile39.63%EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
BenchmarkAA Omniscience AccuracyScore18.93%Rank133Participants201Percentile34.00%EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A

Solar Pro 4 Arena Results

Preference and agent-evaluation results for the default version.

30 of 93 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Arena
Category
Rank
Rating / score
Votes
Observations
Result date
Arenaagent tool hallucinationCategoryoverallRank40Rating / score-0.02VotesN/AObservations442.4KResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenaagent steerabilityCategoryoverallRank41Rating / score-0.15VotesN/AObservations23.8KResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenaagent praise complaintCategoryoverallRank42Rating / score-0.21VotesN/AObservations2.1KResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenaagentCategoryoverallRank44Rating / score-0.20VotesN/AObservations485.5KResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenaagent bash recovery stepsCategoryoverallRank44Rating / score-0.26VotesN/AObservations23.4KResult dateOct 8, 2026
Arenaagent task outcome explicitCategoryoverallRank44Rating / score-0.28VotesN/AObservations4.6KResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenaagent bash reliabilityCategoryoverallRank44Rating / score-0.45VotesN/AObservations12.6KResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenaagent bash reliability no prereqCategoryoverallRank45Rating / score-0.52VotesN/AObservations6.5KResult dateOct 14, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryindustry mathematicalRank62Rating / score1,435.35Votes1,068ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryexpertRank71Rating / score1,460.68Votes2,317ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenawebdevCategorywebdev-reactRank74Rating / score1,363.23Votes2,953ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 19, 2026
ArenatextCategorykoreanRank75Rating / score1,383.15Votes367ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategorymathRank75Rating / score1,421.32Votes924ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategorychineseRank78Rating / score1,457.81Votes1,481ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenawebdevCategoryoverallRank78Rating / score1,370.68Votes4,655ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 19, 2026
ArenawebdevCategorywebdevRank78Rating / score1,370.68Votes4,655ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 19, 2026
ArenawebdevCategorywebdev-htmlRank78Rating / score1,370.63Votes813ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 19, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategorykoreanRank83Rating / score1,374.94Votes367ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryindustry legal and governmentRank85Rating / score1,430.08Votes1,626ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryindustry medicine and healthcareRank88Rating / score1,422.10Votes1,260ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategorycodingRank90Rating / score1,474.15Votes5,836ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryhard prompts englishRank90Rating / score1,458.84Votes5,860ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenatextCategorymathRank92Rating / score1,420.86Votes1,181ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenatextCategoryexpertRank93Rating / score1,427.99Votes2,674ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenatextCategorycodingRank95Rating / score1,437.51Votes5,940ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
ArenatextCategoryindustry mathematicalRank95Rating / score1,427.01Votes1,360ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryindustry software and it servicesRank95Rating / score1,460.31Votes8,785ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryindustry life and physical and social scienceRank98Rating / score1,437.53Votes3,521ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryenglishRank99Rating / score1,433.28Votes9,217ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryrussianRank100Rating / score1,398.06Votes2,566ObservationsN/AResult dateOct 20, 2026

Solar Pro 4 Pricing

Official vendor API pricing appears first, followed by individual provider offers.

Official API
$0.30 input, $1.2 output per 1M
Official provider
Upstage
Lowest third-party
From $0.03 input, $0.12 output per 1M via NanoGPT
Tracked offerings
6
6 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Provider
Provider model ID
Region
Input / 1M
Output / 1M
Context
Updated
ProviderNanoGPTProvider model IDupstage/solar-pro4RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.03Output / 1M$0.12Context524.3KUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderAI/ML APIProvider model IDupstage/solar-pro4RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.0317Output / 1M$0.127Context524.3KUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderOpenRouterProvider model IDupstage/solar-pro4RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.15Output / 1M$0.60Context524.3KUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderLLMTRProvider model IDupstage/solar-pro4RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.15Output / 1M$0.60Context524.3KUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderUpstageProvider model IDsolar-pro4RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.30Output / 1M$1.2Context524.3KUpdatedOct 23, 2026
ProviderKilo GatewayProvider model IDupstage/solar-pro4RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.30Output / 1M$1.2Context524.3KUpdatedOct 23, 2026

Official prices use only the vendor's configured official Provider and positive standard USD PAYG rates. Third-party offers remain explicitly labeled.

Solar Pro 4 Runtime Performance

Provider-specific output speed and catalog latency for Solar Pro 4. Runtime does not affect the capability score.

No runtime data

No provider-specific speed or latency record is linked to the default version yet.

Output Speed is generated output tokens received per second. Catalog latency is reported separately from observed provider TTFT.

Solar Pro 4 Specifications

Technical details for the model's default version.

Version
Solar Pro 4
Released
Aug 6, 2026
Knowledge cutoff
Unknown
Parameters
N/A
Context window
524.3K
Max output
131.1K
Inputs
text
Outputs
text
Open weights
No
License
Proprietary

Solar Pro 4 Versions

Available versions of this model. The score column identifies the version used in the overall ranking.

1 row
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Version
Released
LLMBoard
Parameters
Context
Max output
Open weights
License
VersionSolar Pro 4ReleasedAug 6, 2026LLMBoard55.14ParametersN/AContext524.3KMax output131.1KOpen weightsNoLicenseProprietary

Models similar to Solar Pro 4

Recommendations prioritize the same model type and family, then the closest LLMBoard score.

#114-0.77
UP

Solar Mini 4

Upstage

54.37 LLMBoard

Details
#113-0.22
AN

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic

54.92 LLMBoard

Details
#111+0.42
AC

Qwen3.5 27B

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

55.56 LLMBoard

Details
#110+0.76
BY

Seed 1.8

ByteDance

55.90 LLMBoard

Details
#115-0.84
XA

Grok 4

xAI

54.30 LLMBoard

Details
#109+1.20
DE

DeepSeek-V3.2

DeepSeek

56.34 LLMBoard

Details

What is Solar Pro 4?

Key information about Solar Pro 4 and its available data.

Solar Pro 4 is Upstage's proprietary reasoning-focused agentic LLM for text-to-text tasks, supporting English, Korean, and Japanese. It has a ~512K context window, up to 128K output tokens, and adjustable reasoning effort.

Data as of 2026-10-22.

FAQ

Common questions about Solar Pro 4.

When was Solar Pro 4 released?

Solar Pro 4's default version was released on Aug 6, 2026.

How much does Solar Pro 4 cost?

Solar Pro 4's official API price is $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.2 per million output tokens via Upstage. The lowest tracked third-party offer starts at $0.03 input and $0.12 output via NanoGPT.

Who created Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4 was created by Upstage.

What is the context window for Solar Pro 4?

The default version has a 524.3K token context window.

Is Solar Pro 4 open weight?

No. The default version is not marked as having publicly available weights.

How many API providers offer Solar Pro 4?

6 provider offerings are linked to the default version.

Browse runtime rankings