llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

long context benchmark

AA-LCR Leaderboard

AA-LCR is an Agent Arena Long Context Reasoning benchmark in the long_context category, reported as a Score ratio.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models27
Model coverage27
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

AA-LCR Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

27 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelUPSolar Mini 4UpstageScore83.30%Percentile100.00%Participants27EvidenceBEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore80.00%Percentile96.15%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelRABeam 1.0Reflection AIScore78.20%Percentile92.31%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelINMercury 3InceptionScore77.67%Percentile88.46%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank05ModelTEHy3TencentScore73.40%Percentile84.62%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank06ModelMAMistral Small 4Mistral AIScore71.20%Percentile80.77%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank07ModelUPSolar Pro 4UpstageScore71.00%Percentile76.92%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank08ModelNVNemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)NVIDIAScore71.00%Percentile73.08%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank09ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore70.00%Percentile69.23%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank10ModelACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore68.70%Percentile65.38%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3 Max ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore68.70%Percentile61.54%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank12ModelNVNemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)NVIDIAScore68.62%Percentile57.69%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank13ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore68.30%Percentile53.85%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank14ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore66.90%Percentile50.00%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank15ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore66.10%Percentile46.15%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank16ModelNVNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)NVIDIAScore65.40%Percentile42.31%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank17ModelINLing 3.0 FlashInclusionaiScore65.10%Percentile38.46%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank18ModelNVNemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)NVIDIAScore64.06%Percentile34.62%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank19ModelACQwen3.5-9BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore63.00%Percentile30.77%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank20ModelMIMiniMax M2.1MiniMaxScore62.00%Percentile26.92%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank21ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore58.50%Percentile23.08%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank22ModelNVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIAScore58.31%Percentile19.23%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank23ModelACQwen3.5-4BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore57.00%Percentile15.38%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank24ModelNVNemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)NVIDIAScore52.00%Percentile11.54%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank25ModelLAEXAONE 4.5 33BLG AI ResearchScore50.60%Percentile7.69%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank26ModelACQwen3.5-2BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore25.60%Percentile3.85%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank27ModelACQwen3.5-0.8BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore4.70%Percentile0.00%Participants27EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

AA-LCR Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

AA-LCR Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

AA-LCR

The Top AI Models for AA-LCR

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is AA-LCR?

What AA-LCR measures and how its scores work.

AA-LCR is an Agent Arena Long Context Reasoning benchmark.

It reports a Score as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
AA-LCR
Modality
text
Primary category
long context
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about AA-LCR.

Which model scores highest on AA-LCR?

Solar Mini 4 is currently ranked first with 83.30%.

What are the top three models on AA-LCR?

The current leaders are Solar Mini 4 (83.30%), Muse Glimmer-30B (80.00%), and Beam 1.0 (78.20%).

Which AA-LCR model has the lowest official input price?

Solar Mini 4 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among AA-LCR results?

The fastest matched records are Mercury 3 (1,068.00 tok/s via Inception) and MiniMax M2.1 (100.00 tok/s via MiniMax).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does AA-LCR measure?

It reports a Score as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

27 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Solar Mini 483.30%
Rank #2Muse Glimmer-30B80.00%
Rank #3Beam 1.078.20%
Rank #4Mercury 377.67%

Ranking basisThis aa-lcr AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    UP
    Solar Mini 4Upstage
    Score
    83.30%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 27 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-LCR, not total model capability
  2. 02
    ME
    Muse Glimmer-30BMeta
    Score
    80.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 27 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-LCR, not total model capability
  3. 03
    RA
    Reflection AI
    Score
    78.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 27 compared models
    • 92th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-LCR, not total model capability
  4. 04
    IN
    Inception
    Score
    77.67%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.35 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 1,068.00 tok/s via Inception

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 27 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-LCR, not total model capability
  5. 05
    TE
    Tencent
    Score
    73.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 27 compared models
    • 85th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-LCR, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for AA-LCR

Solar Mini 4 currently leads AA-LCR with 83.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Beam 1.0
Mercury 3
Hy3
Benchmark rank #1Solar Mini 483.30% · $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Muse Glimmer-30B80.00%
Benchmark rank #3Beam 1.078.20%