llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

long context benchmark

AA-LCR Leaderboard

AA-LCR is an Agent Arena Long Context Reasoning benchmark in the long_context category, reported as a Score ratio.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models19
Model coverage19
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

AA-LCR Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

19 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore80.00%Percentile100.00%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelTEHy3TencentScore73.40%Percentile94.44%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMAMistral Small 4Mistral AIScore71.20%Percentile88.89%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelUPSolar Pro 4UpstageScore71.00%Percentile83.33%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore70.00%Percentile77.78%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore68.70%Percentile72.22%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore68.30%Percentile66.67%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore66.90%Percentile61.11%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore66.10%Percentile55.56%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelNVNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)NVIDIAScore65.40%Percentile50.00%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3.5-9BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore63.00%Percentile44.44%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelMIMiniMax M2.1MiniMaxScore62.00%Percentile38.89%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore58.50%Percentile33.33%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelNVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIAScore58.31%Percentile27.78%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelACQwen3.5-4BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore57.00%Percentile22.22%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelNVNemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)NVIDIAScore52.00%Percentile16.67%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelLAEXAONE 4.5 33BLG AI ResearchScore50.60%Percentile11.11%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelACQwen3.5-2BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore25.60%Percentile5.56%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelACQwen3.5-0.8BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore4.70%Percentile0.00%Participants19EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

AA-LCR Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

AA-LCR Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

AA-LCR

The Top AI Models for AA-LCR

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is AA-LCR?

What AA-LCR measures and how its scores work.

AA-LCR is an Agent Arena Long Context Reasoning benchmark.

It reports a Score as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
AA-LCR
Modality
text
Primary category
long context
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about AA-LCR.

Which model scores highest on AA-LCR?

Muse Glimmer-30B is currently ranked first with 80.00%.

What are the top three models on AA-LCR?

The current leaders are Muse Glimmer-30B (80.00%), Hy3 (73.40%), and Mistral Small 4 (71.20%).

Which AA-LCR model has the lowest official input price?

Mistral Small 4 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among AA-LCR results?

The fastest matched records are Mistral Small 4 (163.71 tok/s via Mistral AI) and MiniMax M2.1 (100.00 tok/s via MiniMax).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does AA-LCR measure?

It reports a Score as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

19 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Muse Glimmer-30B80.00%
Rank #2Hy373.40%
Rank #3Mistral Small 471.20%
Rank #4Solar Pro 471.00%

Ranking basisThis aa-lcr AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Muse Glimmer-30BMeta
    Score
    80.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 19 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-LCR, not total model capability
  2. 02
    TE
    Hy3Tencent
    Score
    73.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 19 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-LCR, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MA
    Mistral AI
    Score
    71.20%
    Price
    $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 163.71 tok/s via Mistral AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 19 compared models
    • 89th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-LCR, not total model capability
  4. 04
    UP
    Upstage
    Score
    71.00%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 19 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-LCR, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    70.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 19 compared models
    • 78th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-LCR, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for AA-LCR

Muse Glimmer-30B currently leads AA-LCR with 80.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Mistral Small 4
Solar Pro 4
Kimi K2.5
Benchmark rank #1Muse Glimmer-30B80.00%
Benchmark rank #2Hy373.40%
Benchmark rank #3Mistral Small 471.20% · $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens