llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1281 models767 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

instruction language context benchmark

AA LCR v1.1 Leaderboard

100 questions; ~100k input tokens (cl100k_base); >=128K context; 3 runs; pass@1; no tools; GPT-5.6 Luna medium judge

Updated Sep 22, 2026

Models100
Model coverage193
Metriclcr
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

AA LCR v1.1 Ranking

Higher lcr ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 100 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
lcr
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIlcr88.67%Percentile100.00%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank02ModelANClaude Fable 5.1Anthropiclcr85.33%Percentile99.48%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIlcr84.33%Percentile98.96%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank04ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIlcr84.00%Percentile98.44%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank05ModelGOGemini 3.8 FlashGooglelcr84.00%Percentile97.92%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank06ModelDEDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeeklcr84.00%Percentile97.40%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank07ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIlcr83.67%Percentile96.88%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank08ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetalcr83.33%Percentile96.35%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank09ModelOPGPT-5.3 CodexOpenAIlcr83.33%Percentile95.83%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank10ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIlcr83.00%Percentile95.31%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank11ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxlcr83.00%Percentile94.79%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank12ModelMEMuse Spark 1.3Metalcr83.00%Percentile94.27%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank13ModelGOGemini 3.7 FlashGooglelcr83.00%Percentile93.75%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank14ModelOPGPT-5.2 CodexOpenAIlcr82.33%Percentile93.23%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank15ModelANClaude Fable 5Anthropiclcr82.33%Percentile92.71%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank16ModelANClaude Sonnet 5Anthropiclcr82.00%Percentile92.19%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank17ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIlcr82.00%Percentile91.67%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank18ModelACQwen3.8-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Teamlcr82.00%Percentile91.15%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank19ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGooglelcr82.00%Percentile90.63%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank20ModelXAGrok 4.6xAIlcr81.00%Percentile90.10%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank21ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIlcr81.00%Percentile89.58%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank22ModelOPGPT-6 AstraOpenAIlcr80.67%Percentile89.06%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank23ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Teamlcr80.33%Percentile88.54%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank24ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeeklcr80.33%Percentile88.02%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank25ModelZAGLM-5.3-FlashZhipu AIlcr80.00%Percentile87.50%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank26ModelOPGPT-5.1OpenAIlcr80.00%Percentile86.98%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank27ModelGOGemini 3.6 FlashGooglelcr80.00%Percentile86.46%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank28ModelXIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomilcr79.67%Percentile85.94%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank29ModelACQwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Teamlcr79.67%Percentile85.42%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A
Rank30ModelZAGLM-5.3Zhipu AIlcr79.67%Percentile84.90%Participants193EvidenceBEvaluatedN/A

AA LCR v1.1 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

AA LCR v1.1 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

AA LCR v1.1

The Top AI Models for AA LCR v1.1

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is AA LCR v1.1?

What AA LCR v1.1 measures and how its scores work.

100 questions; ~100k input tokens (cl100k_base); >=128K context; 3 runs; pass@1; no tools; GPT-5.6 Luna medium judge

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
aa-lcr
Modality
text
Primary category
instruction language context
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
overall

Artificial Analysis. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about AA LCR v1.1.

Which model scores highest on AA LCR v1.1?

Kimi K3 is currently ranked first with 88.67%.

What are the top three models on AA LCR v1.1?

The current leaders are Kimi K3 (88.67%), Claude Fable 5.1 (85.33%), and GPT-5.5 (84.33%).

Which AA LCR v1.1 model has the lowest official input price?

MiMo-V2-Omni has the lowest matched official input price at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among AA LCR v1.1 results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5 mini (348.85 tok/s via OpenAI), MiniMax M2.5 (250.50 tok/s via MiniMax), and GPT-5.1 (207.45 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest lcr result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does AA LCR v1.1 measure?

100 questions; ~100k input tokens (cl100k_base); >=128K context; 3 runs; pass@1; no tools; GPT-5.6 Luna medium judge

Is a higher lcr better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

100 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.

Rank #1Kimi K388.67%
Rank #2Claude Fable 5.185.33%
Rank #3GPT-5.584.33%
Rank #4GPT-5.6 Sol84.00%

Ranking basisThis aa lcr v1.1 AI model leaderboard uses descending lcr in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    Kimi K3Moonshot AI
    lcr
    88.67%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 4.03 tok/s via Moonshot AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 193 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA LCR v1.1, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
    lcr
    85.33%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 3.94 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 193 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA LCR v1.1, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    lcr
    84.33%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 193 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA LCR v1.1, not total model capability
  4. 04
    OP
    OpenAI
    lcr
    84.00%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 35.30 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 193 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA LCR v1.1, not total model capability
  5. 05
    GO
    Google
    lcr
    84.00%
    Price
    $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 155.60 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 193 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA LCR v1.1, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for AA LCR v1.1

Kimi K3 currently leads AA LCR v1.1 with 88.67%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.5
GPT-5.6 Sol
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Benchmark rank #1Kimi K388.67% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Fable 5.185.33% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.584.33% · $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens