llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

BrowseComp Leaderboard

BrowseComp is a reasoning benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to navigate the internet to find hard-to-find, entangled information.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models63
Model coverage63
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

BrowseComp Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 63 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-6 AstraOpenAIScore91.50%Percentile100.00%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore91.20%Percentile98.39%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicScore90.80%Percentile96.77%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore90.40%Percentile95.16%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelOPGPT-5.5 ProOpenAIScore90.10%Percentile93.55%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore87.50%Percentile91.94%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelANClaude Mythos PreviewAnthropicScore86.90%Percentile90.32%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore86.30%Percentile88.71%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore86.20%Percentile87.10%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleScore85.90%Percentile85.48%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore84.90%Percentile83.87%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicScore84.70%Percentile82.26%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIScore84.40%Percentile80.65%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore84.30%Percentile79.03%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelTEHy3TencentScore84.20%Percentile77.42%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore84.00%Percentile75.81%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore83.52%Percentile74.19%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeekScore83.40%Percentile72.58%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore83.30%Percentile70.97%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIScore82.70%Percentile69.35%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicScore79.30%Percentile67.74%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AIScore79.30%Percentile66.13%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelOPGPT-5.2 ProOpenAIScore77.90%Percentile64.52%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelTMInkling-SmallThinking Machines LabScore77.40%Percentile62.90%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelBYSeed 2.0 ProByteDanceScore77.30%Percentile61.29%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelMIMiniMax M2.5MiniMaxScore76.30%Percentile59.68%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelZAGLM-5Zhipu AIScore75.90%Percentile58.06%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore74.90%Percentile56.45%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank29ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicScore74.70%Percentile54.84%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank30ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxDeepSeekScore73.20%Percentile53.23%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

BrowseComp Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

BrowseComp Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

BrowseComp

The Top AI Models for BrowseComp

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is BrowseComp?

What BrowseComp measures and how its scores work.

BrowseComp is a benchmark of 1,266 questions requiring AI agents to search the internet for concise, verifiable answers.

It measures agents' persistence in information gathering, creativity in web navigation, and ability to find concise, verifiable answers.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
BrowseComp
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about BrowseComp.

Which model scores highest on BrowseComp?

GPT-6 Astra is currently ranked first with 91.50%.

What are the top three models on BrowseComp?

The current leaders are GPT-6 Astra (91.50%), Kimi K3 (91.20%), and Claude Opus 5 (90.80%).

Which BrowseComp model has the lowest official input price?

Step-3.5-Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among BrowseComp results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5.5 (134.94 tok/s via OpenAI), Claude Opus 4.6 (123.15 tok/s via Anthropic), and o4-mini (115.00 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does BrowseComp measure?

It measures agents' persistence in information gathering, creativity in web navigation, and ability to find concise, verifiable answers.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

63 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-6 Astra91.50%
Rank #2Kimi K391.20%
Rank #3Claude Opus 590.80%
Rank #4GPT-5.6 Sol90.40%

Ranking basisThis browsecomp AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    Score
    91.50%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 30.66 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 63 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BrowseComp, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MA
    Kimi K3Moonshot AI
    Score
    91.20%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 63 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BrowseComp, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    90.80%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 62.88 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 63 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BrowseComp, not total model capability
  4. 04
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    90.40%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 2.36 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 63 compared models
    • 95th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BrowseComp, not total model capability
  5. 05
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    90.10%
    Price
    $30 input / $180 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 63 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BrowseComp, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for BrowseComp

GPT-6 Astra currently leads BrowseComp with 91.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Opus 5
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.5 Pro
Benchmark rank #1GPT-6 Astra91.50% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Kimi K391.20% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Opus 590.80% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens