llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Unspecified benchmark

LM Arena Text Style Control Leaderboard

LM Arena Text Style Control is listed with an Arena Rating measured in rating units.

Updated Sep 8, 2026

Models100
Model coverage210
MetricArena Rating
EvidenceA

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LM Arena Text Style Control Ranking

Higher arena rating ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 100 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Arena Rating
Percentile
Participants
Votes
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicArena Rating1,507.16 rating (1,502.20 rating - 1,512.13 rating)Percentile100.00%Participants210Votes27,189EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,504.84 rating (1,501.32 rating - 1,508.36 rating)Percentile99.52%Participants210Votes72,099EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicArena Rating1,504.21 rating (1,493.02 rating - 1,515.41 rating)Percentile99.04%Participants210Votes2,906EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicArena Rating1,502.11 rating (1,498.22 rating - 1,505.99 rating)Percentile98.56%Participants210Votes60,103EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank05ModelMEMuse Spark 1.2MetaArena Rating1,498.99 rating (1,488.50 rating - 1,509.48 rating)Percentile98.09%Participants210Votes3,240EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank06ModelGOGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,493.85 rating (1,485.29 rating - 1,502.40 rating)Percentile97.61%Participants210Votes5,125EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank07ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicArena Rating1,493.33 rating (1,488.76 rating - 1,497.89 rating)Percentile97.13%Participants210Votes35,174EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank08ModelMEMuse Spark 1.1MetaArena Rating1,492.06 rating (1,487.02 rating - 1,497.10 rating)Percentile96.65%Participants210Votes24,064EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank09ModelGOGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,490.93 rating (1,482.75 rating - 1,499.10 rating)Percentile96.17%Participants210Votes5,682EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank10ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIArena Rating1,488.67 rating (1,483.21 rating - 1,494.13 rating)Percentile95.69%Participants210Votes18,090EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank11ModelMEMuse SparkMetaArena Rating1,488.17 rating (1,482.32 rating - 1,494.01 rating)Percentile95.22%Participants210Votes13,572EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank12ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleArena Rating1,486.73 rating (1,483.52 rating - 1,489.94 rating)Percentile94.74%Participants210Votes102,999EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank13ModelGOGemini 3 ProGoogleArena Rating1,485.58 rating (1,481.72 rating - 1,489.43 rating)Percentile94.26%Participants210Votes40,668EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank14ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIArena Rating1,483.15 rating (1,478.04 rating - 1,488.26 rating)Percentile93.78%Participants210Votes23,413EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank15ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicArena Rating1,482.31 rating (1,478.06 rating - 1,486.57 rating)Percentile93.30%Participants210Votes48,727EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank16ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIArena Rating1,482.09 rating (1,478.24 rating - 1,485.93 rating)Percentile92.82%Participants210Votes63,547EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank17ModelZAGLM-5.3Zhipu AIArena Rating1,482.04 rating (1,474.74 rating - 1,489.34 rating)Percentile92.34%Participants210Votes7,668EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank18ModelGOGemini 3.6 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,480.20 rating (1,475.08 rating - 1,485.31 rating)Percentile91.87%Participants210Votes22,286EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank19ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamArena Rating1,479.56 rating (1,473.34 rating - 1,485.78 rating)Percentile91.39%Participants210Votes13,346EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank20ModelGOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,479.43 rating (1,475.10 rating - 1,483.77 rating)Percentile90.91%Participants210Votes34,180EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank21ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIArena Rating1,476.55 rating (1,472.67 rating - 1,480.43 rating)Percentile90.43%Participants210Votes60,624EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank22ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIArena Rating1,476.29 rating (1,472.16 rating - 1,480.43 rating)Percentile89.95%Participants210Votes34,217EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank23ModelZAGLM-5.3-FlashZhipu AIArena Rating1,474.16 rating (1,465.24 rating - 1,483.08 rating)Percentile89.47%Participants210Votes4,672EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank24ModelGOGemini 3 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,473.83 rating (1,469.41 rating - 1,478.25 rating)Percentile89.00%Participants210Votes30,244EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank25ModelOPGPT-5.5 InstantOpenAIArena Rating1,473.71 rating (1,468.60 rating - 1,478.83 rating)Percentile88.52%Participants210Votes25,860EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank26ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamArena Rating1,473.62 rating (1,463.62 rating - 1,483.62 rating)Percentile88.04%Participants210Votes3,710EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank27ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicArena Rating1,472.84 rating (1,468.93 rating - 1,476.74 rating)Percentile87.56%Participants210Votes36,269EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank28ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,472.39 rating (1,468.78 rating - 1,476.00 rating)Percentile87.08%Participants210Votes66,316EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank29ModelXAGrok-4.20 Beta ReasoningxAIArena Rating1,471.72 rating (1,467.94 rating - 1,475.50 rating)Percentile86.60%Participants210Votes62,251EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
Rank30ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIArena Rating1,471.72 rating (1,467.00 rating - 1,476.43 rating)Percentile86.12%Participants210Votes33,966EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026

LM Arena Text Style Control Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Text Style Control Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Text Style Control

The Top AI Models for LM Arena Text Style Control

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LM Arena Text Style Control?

What LM Arena Text Style Control measures and how its scores work.

LM Arena Text Style Control is a benchmark with a current leaderboard.

It measures Arena Rating, reported in rating units.

Scores are shown in rating. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of A.

Family
lm-arena-text-style-control
Modality
Unspecified
Primary category
Unspecified
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LM Arena. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LM Arena Text Style Control.

Which model scores highest on LM Arena Text Style Control?

Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 1,507.16 rating.

What are the top three models on LM Arena Text Style Control?

The current leaders are Claude Fable 5 (1,507.16 rating), Claude Opus 4.6 (1,504.84 rating), and Claude Fable 5.1 (1,504.21 rating).

Which LM Arena Text Style Control model has the lowest official input price?

GLM-5.3-Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.08 input / $0.25 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LM Arena Text Style Control results?

The fastest matched records are GLM-5.3 (472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI), Gemini 3.5 Flash (210.94 tok/s via Google), and GPT-5.5 Instant (206.89 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest arena rating result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LM Arena Text Style Control measure?

It measures Arena Rating, reported in rating units.

Is a higher arena rating better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

100 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Fable 51,507.16 rating (1,502.20 rating - 1,512.13 rating)
Rank #2Claude Opus 4.61,504.84 rating (1,501.32 rating - 1,508.36 rating)
Rank #3Claude Fable 5.11,504.21 rating (1,493.02 rating - 1,515.41 rating)
Rank #4Claude Opus 4.71,502.11 rating (1,498.22 rating - 1,505.99 rating)

Ranking basisThis lm arena text style control AI model leaderboard uses descending arena rating in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Fable 5Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,507.16 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.18 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 210 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Text Style Control, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,504.84 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 123.15 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 210 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Text Style Control, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,504.21 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 7.67 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 210 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Text Style Control, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,502.11 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 210 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Text Style Control, not total model capability
  5. 05
    ME
    Meta
    Arena Rating
    1,498.99 rating
    Price
    $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 28.44 tok/s via Meta Model API

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 210 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Text Style Control, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LM Arena Text Style Control

Claude Fable 5 currently leads LM Arena Text Style Control with 1,507.16 rating. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Opus 4.7
Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmark rank #1Claude Fable 51,507.16 rating · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Opus 4.61,504.84 rating · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Fable 5.11,504.21 rating · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens