llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Unspecified benchmark

LM Arena Webdev Leaderboard

LM Arena Webdev is a current leaderboard using the Arena Rating metric.

Updated Sep 8, 2026

Models97
Model coverage97
MetricArena Rating
EvidenceA

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LM Arena Webdev Ranking

Higher arena rating ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 97 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Arena Rating
Percentile
Participants
Votes
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-6 AstraOpenAIArena Rating1,797.04 rating (1,773.44 rating - 1,820.64 rating)Percentile100.00%Participants97Votes1,199EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicArena Rating1,762.25 rating (1,746.20 rating - 1,778.29 rating)Percentile98.96%Participants97Votes2,275EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicArena Rating1,687.61 rating (1,679.84 rating - 1,695.38 rating)Percentile97.92%Participants97Votes10,904EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamArena Rating1,686.07 rating (1,669.84 rating - 1,702.30 rating)Percentile96.88%Participants97Votes1,868EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank05ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIArena Rating1,674.35 rating (1,663.12 rating - 1,685.58 rating)Percentile95.83%Participants97Votes4,546EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank06ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicArena Rating1,629.05 rating (1,621.22 rating - 1,636.87 rating)Percentile94.79%Participants97Votes9,356EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamArena Rating1,626.46 rating (1,612.18 rating - 1,640.73 rating)Percentile93.75%Participants97Votes2,158EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank08ModelXAGrok 4.6xAIArena Rating1,624.86 rating (1,613.60 rating - 1,636.11 rating)Percentile92.71%Participants97Votes3,487EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank09ModelMEMuse Spark 1.3MetaArena Rating1,622.48 rating (1,604.25 rating - 1,640.71 rating)Percentile91.67%Participants97Votes1,274EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank10ModelTEHy4 previewTencentArena Rating1,621.26 rating (1,605.46 rating - 1,637.06 rating)Percentile90.63%Participants97Votes1,661EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIArena Rating1,617.42 rating (1,610.19 rating - 1,624.66 rating)Percentile89.58%Participants97Votes11,014EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank12ModelZAGLM-5.3Zhipu AIArena Rating1,608.96 rating (1,596.66 rating - 1,621.26 rating)Percentile88.54%Participants97Votes2,930EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank13ModelZAGLM-5.3-FlashZhipu AIArena Rating1,604.97 rating (1,590.26 rating - 1,619.68 rating)Percentile87.50%Participants97Votes1,961EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank14ModelACQwen3.8-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamArena Rating1,593.73 rating (1,582.76 rating - 1,604.70 rating)Percentile86.46%Participants97Votes3,543EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank15ModelGOGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,586.89 rating (1,574.80 rating - 1,598.99 rating)Percentile85.42%Participants97Votes3,008EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank16ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIArena Rating1,586.57 rating (1,579.15 rating - 1,594.00 rating)Percentile84.38%Participants97Votes9,836EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank17ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeekArena Rating1,581.68 rating (1,570.73 rating - 1,592.63 rating)Percentile83.33%Participants97Votes3,518EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank18ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731DeepSeekArena Rating1,579.64 rating (1,569.51 rating - 1,589.76 rating)Percentile82.29%Participants97Votes4,177EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank19ModelGOGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,567.23 rating (1,554.84 rating - 1,579.63 rating)Percentile81.25%Participants97Votes2,727EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank20ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicArena Rating1,562.72 rating (1,555.94 rating - 1,569.49 rating)Percentile80.21%Participants97Votes12,937EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank21ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicArena Rating1,557.29 rating (1,551.26 rating - 1,563.31 rating)Percentile79.17%Participants97Votes15,724EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank22ModelXAGrok 4.5xAIArena Rating1,555.87 rating (1,547.94 rating - 1,563.80 rating)Percentile78.13%Participants97Votes7,361EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank23ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,546.01 rating (1,540.38 rating - 1,551.64 rating)Percentile77.08%Participants97Votes18,177EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank24ModelMEMuse Spark 1.1MetaArena Rating1,541.01 rating (1,533.13 rating - 1,548.88 rating)Percentile76.04%Participants97Votes7,378EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank25ModelGOGemini 3.6 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,538.37 rating (1,530.61 rating - 1,546.14 rating)Percentile75.00%Participants97Votes8,062EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank26ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicArena Rating1,536.91 rating (1,529.40 rating - 1,544.43 rating)Percentile73.96%Participants97Votes8,401EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank27ModelMEMuse Spark 1.2MetaArena Rating1,534.19 rating (1,520.24 rating - 1,548.14 rating)Percentile72.92%Participants97Votes2,065EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank28ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,521.49 rating (1,516.19 rating - 1,526.79 rating)Percentile71.88%Participants97Votes21,457EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank29ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceArena Rating1,521.12 rating (1,513.64 rating - 1,528.59 rating)Percentile70.83%Participants97Votes8,617EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
Rank30ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIArena Rating1,519.67 rating (1,511.50 rating - 1,527.84 rating)Percentile69.79%Participants97Votes6,834EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026

LM Arena Webdev Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Webdev Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Webdev

The Top AI Models for LM Arena Webdev

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LM Arena Webdev?

What LM Arena Webdev measures and how its scores work.

LM Arena Webdev is a current leaderboard.

It reports Arena Rating in rating units.

Scores are shown in rating. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of A.

Family
lm-arena-webdev
Modality
Unspecified
Primary category
Unspecified
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LM Arena. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LM Arena Webdev.

Which model scores highest on LM Arena Webdev?

GPT-6 Astra is currently ranked first with 1,797.04 rating.

What are the top three models on LM Arena Webdev?

The current leaders are GPT-6 Astra (1,797.04 rating), Claude Fable 5.1 (1,762.25 rating), and Claude Opus 5 (1,687.61 rating).

Which LM Arena Webdev model has the lowest official input price?

GLM-5.3-Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.08 input / $0.25 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LM Arena Webdev results?

The fastest matched records are GLM-5.3 (472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI), GPT-5.1 Medium (369.03 tok/s via OpenAI), and Mercury 2 (346.33 tok/s via Inception).

Does the highest arena rating result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LM Arena Webdev measure?

It reports Arena Rating in rating units.

Is a higher arena rating better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

97 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-6 Astra1,797.04 rating (1,773.44 rating - 1,820.64 rating)
Rank #2Claude Fable 5.11,762.25 rating (1,746.20 rating - 1,778.29 rating)
Rank #3Claude Opus 51,687.61 rating (1,679.84 rating - 1,695.38 rating)
Rank #4Qwen3.8 Max1,686.07 rating (1,669.84 rating - 1,702.30 rating)

Ranking basisThis lm arena webdev AI model leaderboard uses descending arena rating in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    Arena Rating
    1,797.04 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 30.66 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 97 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Webdev, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,762.25 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 7.67 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 97 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Webdev, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,687.61 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 62.88 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 97 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Webdev, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Arena Rating
    1,686.07 rating
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 97 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Webdev, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Arena Rating
    1,674.35 rating
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 97 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Webdev, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LM Arena Webdev

GPT-6 Astra currently leads LM Arena Webdev with 1,797.04 rating. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Opus 5
Qwen3.8 Max
Kimi K3
Benchmark rank #1GPT-6 Astra1,797.04 rating · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Fable 5.11,762.25 rating · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Opus 51,687.61 rating · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens