llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

math benchmark

AIME 2026 Leaderboard

AIME 2026 is a math benchmark comprising all 30 problems from the 2026 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), with integer answers from 000-999.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models22
Model coverage22
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

AIME 2026 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

22 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIScore99.20%Percentile100.00%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelSASakana NamazuSakana AIScore96.67%Percentile95.24%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore96.40%Percentile90.48%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelTMInkling-SmallThinking Machines LabScore95.50%Percentile85.71%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AIScore95.30%Percentile80.95%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore95.30%Percentile76.19%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelUPSolar Pro 4UpstageScore95.30%Percentile71.43%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore94.70%Percentile66.67%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelMIMAI-Thinking-1MicrosoftScore94.50%Percentile61.90%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelBYSeed 2.0 ProByteDanceScore94.20%Percentile57.14%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore94.10%Percentile52.38%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore92.70%Percentile47.62%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelLAEXAONE 4.5 33BLG AI ResearchScore92.60%Percentile42.86%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelMIMAI-Code-1-FlashMicrosoftScore92.50%Percentile38.10%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore91.30%Percentile33.33%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelGOGemma 4 31BGoogleScore89.20%Percentile28.57%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelGOGemma 4 26B-A4BGoogleScore88.30%Percentile23.81%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelBYSeed 2.0 LiteByteDanceScore88.30%Percentile19.05%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelGOGemma 4 12BGoogleScore77.50%Percentile14.29%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelGODiffusionGemma 26B-A4BGoogleScore69.10%Percentile9.52%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelGOGemma 4 E4BGoogleScore42.50%Percentile4.76%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelGOGemma 4 E2BGoogleScore37.50%Percentile0.00%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

AIME 2026 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

AIME 2026 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

AIME 2026

The Top AI Models for AIME 2026

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is AIME 2026?

What AIME 2026 measures and how its scores work.

AIME 2026 is an AI benchmark based on the 30 problems from the 2026 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II).

It measures performance on complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning, reported as a Score ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
AIME 2026
Modality
text
Primary category
math
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about AIME 2026.

Which model scores highest on AIME 2026?

GLM-5.2 is currently ranked first with 99.20%.

What are the top three models on AIME 2026?

The current leaders are GLM-5.2 (99.20%), Sakana Namazu (96.67%), and Kimi K2.6 (96.40%).

Which AIME 2026 model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.25 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among AIME 2026 results?

The fastest matched records are Gemma 4 31B (22.86 tok/s via FriendliAI), Seed 2.0 Pro (4.40 tok/s via DeepInfra), and GLM-5.2 (3.96 tok/s via ZAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does AIME 2026 measure?

It measures performance on complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning, reported as a Score ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

22 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GLM-5.299.20%
Rank #2Sakana Namazu96.67%
Rank #3Kimi K2.696.40%
Rank #4Inkling-Small95.50%

Ranking basisThis aime 2026 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ZA
    GLM-5.2Zhipu AI
    Score
    99.20%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 3.96 tok/s via ZAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 22 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AIME 2026, not total model capability
  2. 02
    SA
    Sakana NamazuSakana AI
    Score
    96.67%
    Price
    $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 22 compared models
    • 95th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AIME 2026, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    96.40%
    Price
    $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 1.24 tok/s via Moonshot AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 22 compared models
    • 90th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AIME 2026, not total model capability
  4. 04
    TM
    Thinking Machines Lab
    Score
    95.50%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 22 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AIME 2026, not total model capability
  5. 05
    ZA
    Zhipu AI
    Score
    95.30%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 22 compared models
    • 81th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AIME 2026, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for AIME 2026

GLM-5.2 currently leads AIME 2026 with 99.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Kimi K2.6
Inkling-Small
GLM-5.1
Benchmark rank #1GLM-5.299.20% · $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Sakana Namazu96.67% · $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Kimi K2.696.40% · $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens