llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Unspecified benchmark

LM Arena Text Leaderboard

LM Arena Text is a current leaderboard.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models100
Model coverage218
MetricArena Rating
EvidenceA

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LM Arena Text Ranking

Higher arena rating ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 100 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Arena Rating
Percentile
Participants
Votes
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelGOGemini 4 ArgonGoogleArena Rating1,532.30 rating (1,523.52 rating - 1,541.09 rating)Percentile100.00%Participants218Votes4,900EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicArena Rating1,516.21 rating (1,509.23 rating - 1,523.20 rating)Percentile99.54%Participants218Votes9,496EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicArena Rating1,511.94 rating (1,506.03 rating - 1,517.86 rating)Percentile99.08%Participants218Votes15,623EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicArena Rating1,508.60 rating (1,503.86 rating - 1,513.34 rating)Percentile98.62%Participants218Votes33,683EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,501.23 rating (1,497.94 rating - 1,504.52 rating)Percentile98.16%Participants218Votes82,619EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank06ModelGOGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,498.88 rating (1,494.36 rating - 1,503.40 rating)Percentile97.70%Participants218Votes41,423EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank07ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicArena Rating1,491.28 rating (1,487.04 rating - 1,495.53 rating)Percentile97.24%Participants218Votes43,399EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank08ModelXIMiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiArena Rating1,491.08 rating (1,481.74 rating - 1,500.42 rating)Percentile96.77%Participants218Votes4,065EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank09ModelMEMuse Spark 1.3MetaArena Rating1,490.46 rating (1,485.04 rating - 1,495.87 rating)Percentile96.31%Participants218Votes19,323EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank10ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicArena Rating1,489.69 rating (1,485.95 rating - 1,493.42 rating)Percentile95.85%Participants218Votes65,131EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank11ModelGOGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,488.53 rating (1,483.76 rating - 1,493.29 rating)Percentile95.39%Participants218Votes29,177EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank12ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamArena Rating1,483.18 rating (1,478.32 rating - 1,488.05 rating)Percentile94.93%Participants218Votes29,418EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank13ModelMEMuse Spark 1.2MetaArena Rating1,482.36 rating (1,475.57 rating - 1,489.15 rating)Percentile94.47%Participants218Votes9,578EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank14ModelGOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,481.98 rating (1,478.12 rating - 1,485.85 rating)Percentile94.01%Participants218Votes48,479EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank15ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleArena Rating1,480.07 rating (1,477.14 rating - 1,482.99 rating)Percentile93.55%Participants218Votes129,523EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank16ModelGOGemini 3.6 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,479.53 rating (1,475.14 rating - 1,483.93 rating)Percentile93.09%Participants218Votes36,079EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank17ModelGOGemini 3 ProGoogleArena Rating1,479.46 rating (1,475.69 rating - 1,483.22 rating)Percentile92.63%Participants218Votes42,059EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank18ModelMEMuse Spark 1.1MetaArena Rating1,478.32 rating (1,474.16 rating - 1,482.47 rating)Percentile92.17%Participants218Votes44,815EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank19ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIArena Rating1,475.71 rating (1,471.20 rating - 1,480.22 rating)Percentile91.71%Participants218Votes34,325EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank20ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamArena Rating1,474.91 rating (1,465.25 rating - 1,484.57 rating)Percentile91.24%Participants218Votes3,942EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank21ModelMEMuse SparkMetaArena Rating1,474.08 rating (1,468.37 rating - 1,479.79 rating)Percentile90.78%Participants218Votes14,153EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank22ModelZAGLM-5.3Zhipu AIArena Rating1,473.69 rating (1,468.61 rating - 1,478.78 rating)Percentile90.32%Participants218Votes24,035EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank23ModelANClaude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicArena Rating1,472.63 rating (1,465.39 rating - 1,479.87 rating)Percentile89.86%Participants218Votes8,126EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank24ModelZAGLM-5.3-FlashZhipu AIArena Rating1,471.36 rating (1,466.59 rating - 1,476.12 rating)Percentile89.40%Participants218Votes36,095EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank25ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIArena Rating1,471.35 rating (1,467.66 rating - 1,475.04 rating)Percentile88.94%Participants218Votes69,340EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank26ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIArena Rating1,470.36 rating (1,466.25 rating - 1,474.48 rating)Percentile88.48%Participants218Votes51,221EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank27ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIArena Rating1,469.06 rating (1,465.33 rating - 1,472.80 rating)Percentile88.02%Participants218Votes64,755EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank28ModelGOGemini 3 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,465.68 rating (1,461.37 rating - 1,470.00 rating)Percentile87.56%Participants218Votes31,311EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank29ModelXIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiArena Rating1,464.09 rating (1,460.59 rating - 1,467.60 rating)Percentile87.10%Participants218Votes77,367EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026
Rank30ModelZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AIArena Rating1,462.68 rating (1,459.13 rating - 1,466.23 rating)Percentile86.64%Participants218Votes64,352EvidenceAEvaluatedOct 20, 2026

LM Arena Text Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Text Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Text

The Top AI Models for LM Arena Text

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LM Arena Text?

What LM Arena Text measures and how its scores work.

LM Arena Text is a current leaderboard.

It reports Arena Rating in rating units.

Scores are shown in rating. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of A.

Family
lm-arena-text
Modality
Unspecified
Primary category
Unspecified
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LM Arena. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LM Arena Text.

Which model scores highest on LM Arena Text?

Gemini 4 Argon is currently ranked first with 1,532.30 rating.

What are the top three models on LM Arena Text?

The current leaders are Gemini 4 Argon (1,532.30 rating), Claude Opus 5.5 (1,516.21 rating), and Claude Fable 5.1 (1,511.94 rating).

Which LM Arena Text model has the lowest official input price?

GLM-5.3-Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.12 input / $0.42 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LM Arena Text results?

The fastest matched records are Gemini 3.7 Flash (409.96 tok/s via Google), GPT-5.6 Luna (215.52 tok/s via OpenAI), and ChatGPT-4o Latest (132.00 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest arena rating result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LM Arena Text measure?

It reports Arena Rating in rating units.

Is a higher arena rating better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

100 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Gemini 4 Argon1,532.30 rating (1,523.52 rating - 1,541.09 rating)
Rank #2Claude Opus 5.51,516.21 rating (1,509.23 rating - 1,523.20 rating)
Rank #3Claude Fable 5.11,511.94 rating (1,506.03 rating - 1,517.86 rating)
Rank #4Claude Opus 51,508.60 rating (1,503.86 rating - 1,513.34 rating)

Ranking basisThis lm arena text AI model leaderboard uses descending arena rating in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    GO
    Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle
    Arena Rating
    1,532.30 rating
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 218 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Text, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,516.21 rating
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 12.33 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 218 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Text, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,511.94 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 218 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Text, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,508.60 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 218 compared models
    • 99th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Text, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,501.23 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 218 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Text, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LM Arena Text

Gemini 4 Argon currently leads LM Arena Text with 1,532.30 rating. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 4.6
Benchmark rank #1Gemini 4 Argon1,532.30 rating · $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Opus 5.51,516.21 rating · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Fable 5.11,511.94 rating · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens