reasoning benchmark
FACTS Grounding evaluates language models on generating factually accurate, well-grounded responses from long-form input contexts.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelGO | Score87.80% | Percentile100.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelGO | Score85.30% | Percentile91.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelGO | Score84.10% | Percentile83.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelGO | Score83.60% | Percentile75.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelGO | Score83.60% | Percentile66.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelGO | Score75.80% | Percentile58.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelGO | Score74.90% | Percentile50.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelGO | Score70.50% | Percentile41.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelGO | Score70.10% | Percentile33.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelGO | Score61.90% | Percentile25.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelZA | Score58.60% | Percentile16.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelGO | Score40.60% | Percentile8.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelGO | Score36.40% | Percentile0.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What FACTS Grounding measures and how its scores work.
FACTS Grounding is a reasoning benchmark comprising 1,719 examples with documents up to 32k tokens that require detailed responses grounded in the provided documents.
It measures the Score ratio for factual accuracy and grounding of responses based on the provided documents.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of C.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about FACTS Grounding.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is currently ranked first with 87.80%.
The current leaders are Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (87.80%), Gemini 2.5 Flash (85.30%), and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (84.10%).
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Gemini 2.0 Flash (183.00 tok/s via Google), Gemini 3 Flash (124.32 tok/s via Google), and Gemini 3 Pro (90.00 tok/s via Google).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures the Score ratio for factual accuracy and grounding of responses based on the provided documents.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis facts grounding AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 currently leads FACTS Grounding with 87.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.