Unspecified benchmark
LM Arena Vision Style Control Leaderboard
LM Arena Vision Style Control is a benchmark with a current leaderboard.
Updated Oct 23, 2026
Models100
Model coverage113
MetricArena Rating
EvidenceA
LM Arena Vision Style Control Ranking
Higher arena rating ranks better on this benchmark.
Sort by
Rank | Model | Arena Rating | Percentile | Participants | Votes | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,308.71 rating (1,301.66 rating - 1,315.77 rating) | Percentile100.00% | Participants113 | Votes14,714 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Arena Rating1,300.00 rating (1,292.54 rating - 1,307.46 rating) | Percentile99.11% | Participants113 | Votes9,957 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,299.07 rating (1,292.65 rating - 1,305.50 rating) | Percentile98.21% | Participants113 | Votes22,286 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,298.72 rating (1,292.15 rating - 1,305.30 rating) | Percentile97.32% | Participants113 | Votes23,139 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,295.17 rating (1,285.94 rating - 1,304.40 rating) | Percentile96.43% | Participants113 | Votes5,369 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelME | Arena Rating1,294.09 rating (1,284.98 rating - 1,303.19 rating) | Percentile95.54% | Participants113 | Votes5,865 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,292.96 rating (1,281.21 rating - 1,304.71 rating) | Percentile94.64% | Participants113 | Votes3,035 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelME | Arena Rating1,292.67 rating (1,278.33 rating - 1,307.01 rating) | Percentile93.75% | Participants113 | Votes1,948 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,291.04 rating (1,281.23 rating - 1,300.84 rating) | Percentile92.86% | Participants113 | Votes4,645 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelME | Arena Rating1,289.59 rating (1,280.38 rating - 1,298.80 rating) | Percentile91.96% | Participants113 | Votes5,392 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,289.30 rating (1,281.90 rating - 1,296.69 rating) | Percentile91.07% | Participants113 | Votes13,623 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,287.86 rating (1,281.20 rating - 1,294.51 rating) | Percentile90.18% | Participants113 | Votes17,743 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,287.59 rating (1,278.26 rating - 1,296.91 rating) | Percentile89.29% | Participants113 | Votes5,026 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,286.16 rating (1,278.83 rating - 1,293.49 rating) | Percentile88.39% | Participants113 | Votes11,439 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,286.05 rating (1,280.26 rating - 1,291.84 rating) | Percentile87.50% | Participants113 | Votes28,781 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,285.74 rating (1,279.26 rating - 1,292.22 rating) | Percentile86.61% | Participants113 | Votes18,303 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank17 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,284.82 rating (1,274.49 rating - 1,295.15 rating) | Percentile85.71% | Participants113 | Votes4,012 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank18 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,284.14 rating (1,278.37 rating - 1,289.90 rating) | Percentile84.82% | Participants113 | Votes30,747 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank19 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,282.39 rating (1,275.58 rating - 1,289.19 rating) | Percentile83.93% | Participants113 | Votes14,061 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank20 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,281.98 rating (1,274.09 rating - 1,289.88 rating) | Percentile83.04% | Participants113 | Votes8,979 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank21 | ModelME | Arena Rating1,280.01 rating (1,273.05 rating - 1,286.96 rating) | Percentile82.14% | Participants113 | Votes12,804 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank22 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,279.55 rating (1,274.42 rating - 1,284.68 rating) | Percentile81.25% | Participants113 | Votes47,114 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank23 | ModelXA | Arena Rating1,278.98 rating (1,271.89 rating - 1,286.06 rating) | Percentile80.36% | Participants113 | Votes12,599 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank24 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,276.06 rating (1,267.32 rating - 1,284.80 rating) | Percentile79.46% | Participants113 | Votes7,590 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank25 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,275.09 rating (1,268.95 rating - 1,281.22 rating) | Percentile78.57% | Participants113 | Votes27,408 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank26 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,272.54 rating (1,267.34 rating - 1,277.74 rating) | Percentile77.68% | Participants113 | Votes39,131 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank27 | ModelZA | Arena Rating1,271.15 rating (1,264.75 rating - 1,277.56 rating) | Percentile76.79% | Participants113 | Votes16,254 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank28 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,268.04 rating (1,260.77 rating - 1,275.31 rating) | Percentile75.89% | Participants113 | Votes11,842 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank29 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,266.95 rating (1,259.08 rating - 1,274.81 rating) | Percentile75.00% | Participants113 | Votes9,238 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank30 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,264.92 rating (1,252.36 rating - 1,277.47 rating) | Percentile74.11% | Participants113 | Votes2,564 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
LM Arena Vision Style Control Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
LM Arena Vision Style Control Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The Top AI Models for LM Arena Vision Style Control
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What is LM Arena Vision Style Control?
What LM Arena Vision Style Control measures and how its scores work.
LM Arena Vision Style Control is a current leaderboard.
It reports Arena Rating in rating units.
Scores are shown in rating. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of A.
- Family
- lm-arena-vision-style-control
- Modality
- Unspecified
- Primary category
- Unspecified
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- overall
LM Arena. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about LM Arena Vision Style Control.
Which model scores highest on LM Arena Vision Style Control?
Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 1,308.71 rating.
What are the top three models on LM Arena Vision Style Control?
The current leaders are Claude Fable 5 (1,308.71 rating), Qwen3.8 Max (1,300.00 rating), and Claude Opus 4.6 (1,299.07 rating).
Which LM Arena Vision Style Control model has the lowest official input price?
GPT-5 nano has the lowest matched official input price at $0.05 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.
Which models are fastest among LM Arena Vision Style Control results?
The fastest matched records are Llama 4 Scout (776.10 tok/s via Groq), Llama 4 Maverick (638.70 tok/s via Sambanova), and GPT-5 nano (500.00 tok/s via OpenAI).
Does the highest arena rating result prove overall model quality?
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.