Unspecified benchmark
LM Arena Vision Style Control is a benchmark with a current leaderboard.
Updated Sep 8, 2026
Higher arena rating ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Arena Rating | Percentile | Participants | Votes | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,313.06 rating (1,304.59 rating - 1,321.52 rating) | Percentile100.00% | Participants107 | Votes10,002 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,301.50 rating (1,294.63 rating - 1,308.37 rating) | Percentile99.06% | Participants107 | Votes21,137 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Arena Rating1,299.71 rating (1,291.40 rating - 1,308.03 rating) | Percentile98.11% | Participants107 | Votes7,244 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,298.76 rating (1,292.03 rating - 1,305.49 rating) | Percentile97.17% | Participants107 | Votes20,883 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelME | Arena Rating1,293.73 rating (1,284.35 rating - 1,303.11 rating) | Percentile96.23% | Participants107 | Votes5,585 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelME | Arena Rating1,291.76 rating (1,277.01 rating - 1,306.52 rating) | Percentile95.28% | Participants107 | Votes1,844 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,290.35 rating (1,282.12 rating - 1,298.58 rating) | Percentile94.34% | Participants107 | Votes8,271 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,288.59 rating (1,280.99 rating - 1,296.19 rating) | Percentile93.40% | Participants107 | Votes13,019 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,286.10 rating (1,279.42 rating - 1,292.78 rating) | Percentile92.45% | Participants107 | Votes21,389 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,285.30 rating (1,277.82 rating - 1,292.79 rating) | Percentile91.51% | Participants107 | Votes13,521 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,284.89 rating (1,274.04 rating - 1,295.74 rating) | Percentile90.57% | Participants107 | Votes3,816 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,284.30 rating (1,275.93 rating - 1,292.66 rating) | Percentile89.62% | Participants107 | Votes8,259 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,282.42 rating (1,273.20 rating - 1,291.64 rating) | Percentile88.68% | Participants107 | Votes5,837 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelXA | Arena Rating1,282.18 rating (1,273.30 rating - 1,291.06 rating) | Percentile87.74% | Participants107 | Votes6,401 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,280.73 rating (1,274.13 rating - 1,287.32 rating) | Percentile86.79% | Participants107 | Votes23,263 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelME | Arena Rating1,279.43 rating (1,270.73 rating - 1,288.13 rating) | Percentile85.85% | Participants107 | Votes6,769 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank17 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,278.55 rating (1,271.73 rating - 1,285.36 rating) | Percentile84.91% | Participants107 | Votes15,446 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank18 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,278.40 rating (1,272.72 rating - 1,284.07 rating) | Percentile83.96% | Participants107 | Votes39,412 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank19 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,277.64 rating (1,268.62 rating - 1,286.66 rating) | Percentile83.02% | Participants107 | Votes7,225 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank20 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,275.34 rating (1,268.90 rating - 1,281.78 rating) | Percentile82.08% | Participants107 | Votes25,610 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank21 | ModelZA | Arena Rating1,272.63 rating (1,255.84 rating - 1,289.42 rating) | Percentile81.13% | Participants107 | Votes1,389 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank22 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,272.48 rating (1,267.01 rating - 1,277.94 rating) | Percentile80.19% | Participants107 | Votes36,747 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank23 | ModelAN | Arena Rating1,267.47 rating (1,259.24 rating - 1,275.70 rating) | Percentile79.25% | Participants107 | Votes8,522 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank24 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,266.42 rating (1,255.60 rating - 1,277.24 rating) | Percentile78.30% | Participants107 | Votes3,886 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank25 | ModelAC | Arena Rating1,265.84 rating (1,257.79 rating - 1,273.88 rating) | Percentile77.36% | Participants107 | Votes9,132 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank26 | ModelOP | Arena Rating1,265.73 rating (1,256.52 rating - 1,274.94 rating) | Percentile76.42% | Participants107 | Votes5,774 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank27 | ModelMA | Arena Rating1,262.82 rating (1,255.70 rating - 1,269.94 rating) | Percentile75.47% | Participants107 | Votes15,378 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank28 | ModelGO | Arena Rating1,261.28 rating (1,254.83 rating - 1,267.72 rating) | Percentile74.53% | Participants107 | Votes34,348 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank29 | ModelBY | Arena Rating1,256.86 rating (1,249.24 rating - 1,264.48 rating) | Percentile73.58% | Participants107 | Votes10,297 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
| Rank30 | ModelXA | Arena Rating1,255.85 rating (1,249.47 rating - 1,262.22 rating) | Percentile72.64% | Participants107 | Votes25,150 | EvidenceA | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What LM Arena Vision Style Control measures and how its scores work.
LM Arena Vision Style Control is a current leaderboard.
It reports Arena Rating in rating units.
Scores are shown in rating. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of A.
LM Arena. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about LM Arena Vision Style Control.
Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 1,313.06 rating.
The current leaders are Claude Fable 5 (1,313.06 rating), Claude Opus 4.7 (1,301.50 rating), and Qwen3.8 Max (1,299.71 rating).
GPT-5 nano has the lowest matched official input price at $0.05 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Llama 4 Scout (776.10 tok/s via Groq), GPT-5 nano (500.00 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-4.1 mini (467.39 tok/s via OpenAI).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It reports Arena Rating in rating units.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
100 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis lm arena vision style control AI model leaderboard uses descending arena rating in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Fable 5 currently leads LM Arena Vision Style Control with 1,313.06 rating. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.