llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Unspecified benchmark

LM Arena Document Style Control Leaderboard

LM Arena Document Style Control is a current leaderboard using the Arena Rating metric.

Updated Sep 8, 2026

Models33
Model coverage33
MetricArena Rating
EvidenceA

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LM Arena Document Style Control Ranking

Higher arena rating ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 33 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Arena Rating
Percentile
Participants
Votes
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicArena Rating1,506.74 rating (1,497.49 rating - 1,515.99 rating)Percentile100.00%Participants33Votes5,792EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicArena Rating1,496.83 rating (1,489.71 rating - 1,503.94 rating)Percentile96.88%Participants33Votes18,990EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,494.69 rating (1,488.15 rating - 1,501.24 rating)Percentile93.75%Participants33Votes37,271EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicArena Rating1,492.66 rating (1,477.77 rating - 1,507.56 rating)Percentile90.63%Participants33Votes1,663EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicArena Rating1,486.56 rating (1,478.38 rating - 1,494.73 rating)Percentile87.50%Participants33Votes8,388EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank06ModelMEMuse Spark 1.1MetaArena Rating1,482.78 rating (1,469.74 rating - 1,495.83 rating)Percentile84.38%Participants33Votes2,054EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank07ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIArena Rating1,482.26 rating (1,469.20 rating - 1,495.32 rating)Percentile81.25%Participants33Votes1,969EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank08ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIArena Rating1,481.34 rating (1,464.44 rating - 1,498.24 rating)Percentile78.13%Participants33Votes1,152EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank09ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicArena Rating1,478.63 rating (1,468.11 rating - 1,489.16 rating)Percentile75.00%Participants33Votes3,601EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank10ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIArena Rating1,477.77 rating (1,470.61 rating - 1,484.93 rating)Percentile71.88%Participants33Votes16,816EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank11ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,477.53 rating (1,471.15 rating - 1,483.91 rating)Percentile68.75%Participants33Votes54,427EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank12ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIArena Rating1,469.34 rating (1,462.47 rating - 1,476.21 rating)Percentile65.63%Participants33Votes29,809EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIArena Rating1,466.73 rating (1,453.19 rating - 1,480.28 rating)Percentile62.50%Participants33Votes1,888EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank14ModelMEMuse SparkMetaArena Rating1,466.33 rating (1,447.90 rating - 1,484.75 rating)Percentile59.38%Participants33Votes1,078EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank15ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicArena Rating1,464.26 rating (1,453.85 rating - 1,474.67 rating)Percentile56.25%Participants33Votes7,965EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank16ModelGOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,462.28 rating (1,451.97 rating - 1,472.60 rating)Percentile53.13%Participants33Votes3,689EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank17ModelXAGrok 4.5xAIArena Rating1,461.97 rating (1,450.02 rating - 1,473.93 rating)Percentile50.00%Participants33Votes2,435EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank18ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleArena Rating1,459.81 rating (1,453.69 rating - 1,465.94 rating)Percentile46.88%Participants33Votes45,162EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank19ModelOPGPT-5.5 InstantOpenAIArena Rating1,455.45 rating (1,446.20 rating - 1,464.69 rating)Percentile43.75%Participants33Votes8,442EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank20ModelGOGemini 3 ProGoogleArena Rating1,450.50 rating (1,441.50 rating - 1,459.51 rating)Percentile40.63%Participants33Votes10,739EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank21ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIArena Rating1,449.51 rating (1,441.65 rating - 1,457.36 rating)Percentile37.50%Participants33Votes11,181EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank22ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamArena Rating1,448.53 rating (1,437.85 rating - 1,459.22 rating)Percentile34.38%Participants33Votes3,088EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank23ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.5AnthropicArena Rating1,446.38 rating (1,439.65 rating - 1,453.11 rating)Percentile31.25%Participants33Votes28,634EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank24ModelGOGemma 4 31BGoogleArena Rating1,445.18 rating (1,436.84 rating - 1,453.51 rating)Percentile28.13%Participants33Votes10,577EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank25ModelGOGemini 3 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,440.79 rating (1,431.42 rating - 1,450.16 rating)Percentile25.00%Participants33Votes7,173EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank26ModelXAGrok-4.20 Beta ReasoningxAIArena Rating1,439.71 rating (1,432.20 rating - 1,447.22 rating)Percentile21.88%Participants33Votes18,666EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank27ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIArena Rating1,434.87 rating (1,427.88 rating - 1,441.85 rating)Percentile18.75%Participants33Votes19,891EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank28ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxArena Rating1,433.52 rating (1,425.06 rating - 1,441.97 rating)Percentile15.63%Participants33Votes6,263EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank29ModelGOGemini 2.5 ProGoogleArena Rating1,430.04 rating (1,423.56 rating - 1,436.52 rating)Percentile12.50%Participants33Votes24,963EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026
Rank30ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIArena Rating1,425.72 rating (1,419.70 rating - 1,431.75 rating)Percentile9.38%Participants33Votes28,068EvidenceAEvaluatedJul 30, 2026

LM Arena Document Style Control Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Document Style Control Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Document Style Control

The Top AI Models for LM Arena Document Style Control

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LM Arena Document Style Control?

What LM Arena Document Style Control measures and how its scores work.

A current leaderboard for LM Arena Document Style Control.

It measures Arena Rating, reported in rating units.

Scores are shown in rating. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of A.

Family
lm-arena-document-style-control
Modality
Unspecified
Primary category
Unspecified
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LM Arena. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LM Arena Document Style Control.

Which model scores highest on LM Arena Document Style Control?

Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 1,506.74 rating.

What are the top three models on LM Arena Document Style Control?

The current leaders are Claude Fable 5 (1,506.74 rating), Claude Opus 4.7 (1,496.83 rating), and Claude Opus 4.6 (1,494.69 rating).

Which LM Arena Document Style Control model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LM Arena Document Style Control results?

The fastest matched records are Gemini 3.5 Flash (210.94 tok/s via Google), GPT-5.5 Instant (206.89 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-5.5 (134.94 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest arena rating result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LM Arena Document Style Control measure?

It measures Arena Rating, reported in rating units.

Is a higher arena rating better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

33 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Fable 51,506.74 rating (1,497.49 rating - 1,515.99 rating)
Rank #2Claude Opus 4.71,496.83 rating (1,489.71 rating - 1,503.94 rating)
Rank #3Claude Opus 4.61,494.69 rating (1,488.15 rating - 1,501.24 rating)
Rank #4Claude Opus 51,492.66 rating (1,477.77 rating - 1,507.56 rating)

Ranking basisThis lm arena document style control AI model leaderboard uses descending arena rating in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Fable 5Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,506.74 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.18 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 33 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Document Style Control, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,496.83 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 33 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Document Style Control, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,494.69 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 123.15 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 33 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Document Style Control, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,492.66 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 62.88 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 33 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Document Style Control, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,486.56 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 33 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Document Style Control, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LM Arena Document Style Control

Claude Fable 5 currently leads LM Arena Document Style Control with 1,506.74 rating. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 4.8
Benchmark rank #1Claude Fable 51,506.74 rating · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Opus 4.71,496.83 rating · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Opus 4.61,494.69 rating · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens