llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

OSWorld-Verified Leaderboard

OSWorld-Verified is a verified subset of OSWorld, a scalable real computer environment for multimodal agents across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models24
Model coverage24
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

OSWorld-Verified Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

24 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore86.10%Percentile100.00%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicScore85.00%Percentile95.65%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.8-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore84.30%Percentile91.30%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore83.40%Percentile86.96%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelGOGemini 3.6 FlashGoogleScore83.00%Percentile82.61%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicScore81.20%Percentile78.26%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelMEMuse Spark 1.1MetaScore80.80%Percentile73.91%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelANClaude Mythos PreviewAnthropicScore79.60%Percentile69.57%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIScore78.70%Percentile65.22%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelGOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogleScore78.40%Percentile60.87%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicScore78.00%Percentile56.52%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIScore75.00%Percentile52.17%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelGOGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogleScore74.00%Percentile47.83%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore73.30%Percentile43.48%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore73.10%Percentile39.13%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelOPGPT-5.4 miniOpenAIScore72.10%Percentile34.78%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore70.06%Percentile30.43%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore65.90%Percentile26.09%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelOPGPT-5.3 CodexOpenAIScore64.70%Percentile21.74%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore62.50%Percentile17.39%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore58.00%Percentile13.04%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore56.20%Percentile8.70%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore54.50%Percentile4.35%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelOPGPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIScore39.00%Percentile0.00%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

OSWorld-Verified Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

OSWorld-Verified Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

OSWorld-Verified

The Top AI Models for OSWorld-Verified

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is OSWorld-Verified?

What OSWorld-Verified measures and how its scores work.

OSWorld-Verified is a verified subset of OSWorld that supports task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning for multimodal agents.

It uses the Score metric, expressed as a ratio, for execution-based evaluation.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
OSWorld-Verified
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about OSWorld-Verified.

Which model scores highest on OSWorld-Verified?

Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 86.10%.

What are the top three models on OSWorld-Verified?

The current leaders are Qwen3.8 Max (86.10%), Claude Fable 5 (85.00%), and Qwen3.8-27B (84.30%).

Which OSWorld-Verified model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.4 nano has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.3 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among OSWorld-Verified results?

The fastest matched records are Gemini 3.5 Flash (210.94 tok/s via Google), GPT-5.5 (134.94 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-5.4 nano (118.31 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does OSWorld-Verified measure?

It uses the Score metric, expressed as a ratio, for execution-based evaluation.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

24 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen3.8 Max86.10%
Rank #2Claude Fable 585.00%
Rank #3Qwen3.8-27B84.30%
Rank #4Claude Opus 4.883.40%

Ranking basisThis osworld-verified AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    86.10%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 24 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OSWorld-Verified, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Fable 5Anthropic
    Score
    85.00%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.18 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 24 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OSWorld-Verified, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    84.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 24 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OSWorld-Verified, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    83.40%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 24 compared models
    • 87th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OSWorld-Verified, not total model capability
  5. 05
    GO
    Google
    Score
    83.00%
    Price
    $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 62.56 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 24 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OSWorld-Verified, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for OSWorld-Verified

Qwen3.8 Max currently leads OSWorld-Verified with 86.10%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.8-27B
Claude Opus 4.8
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.8 Max86.10% · $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Fable 585.00% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.8-27B84.30%