llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

MCP Atlas Leaderboard

MCP Atlas is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on scaled tool use capabilities across complex multi-step tasks.

Updated Sep 7, 2026

Models34
Model coverage34
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MCP Atlas Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 34 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMEMuse Spark 1.1MetaScore88.10%Percentile100.00%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore84.20%Percentile96.97%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore83.80%Percentile93.94%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore83.70%Percentile90.91%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelGOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogleScore83.60%Percentile87.88%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore82.20%Percentile84.85%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore80.30%Percentile81.82%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelTMInkling-SmallThinking Machines LabScore79.60%Percentile78.79%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelTEHy3TencentScore79.10%Percentile75.76%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicScore77.30%Percentile72.73%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIScore76.80%Percentile69.70%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore76.40%Percentile66.67%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelMAKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AIScore76.00%Percentile63.64%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore75.50%Percentile60.61%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIScore75.30%Percentile57.58%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore74.20%Percentile54.55%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore74.10%Percentile51.52%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeekScore73.60%Percentile48.48%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore73.20%Percentile45.45%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AIScore71.80%Percentile42.42%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleScore69.20%Percentile39.39%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxDeepSeekScore69.00%Percentile36.36%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelZAGLM-5Zhipu AIScore67.80%Percentile33.33%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423DeepSeekScore67.40%Percentile30.30%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIScore67.20%Percentile27.27%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore62.80%Percentile24.24%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore62.70%Percentile21.21%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicScore62.30%Percentile18.18%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank29ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicScore61.30%Percentile15.15%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank30ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIScore60.60%Percentile12.12%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

MCP Atlas Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

MCP Atlas Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MCP Atlas

The Top AI Models for MCP Atlas

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is MCP Atlas?

What MCP Atlas measures and how its scores work.

MCP Atlas is a reasoning benchmark for evaluating AI models on scaled tool use capabilities.

It measures how well models coordinate and utilize multiple tools across complex multi-step tasks.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MCP Atlas
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MCP Atlas.

Which model scores highest on MCP Atlas?

Muse Spark 1.1 is currently ranked first with 88.10%.

What are the top three models on MCP Atlas?

The current leaders are Muse Spark 1.1 (88.10%), Kimi K3 (84.20%), and Seed 2.1 Pro (83.80%).

Which MCP Atlas model has the lowest official input price?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max has the lowest matched official input price at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among MCP Atlas results?

The fastest matched records are Gemini 3.5 Flash (210.94 tok/s via Google), GPT-5.5 (134.94 tok/s via OpenAI), and Gemini 3 Flash (124.32 tok/s via Google).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does MCP Atlas measure?

It measures how well models coordinate and utilize multiple tools across complex multi-step tasks.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

34 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Muse Spark 1.188.10%
Rank #2Kimi K384.20%
Rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro83.80%
Rank #4Hy4 preview83.70%

Ranking basisThis mcp atlas AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Muse Spark 1.1Meta
    Score
    88.10%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 14.00 tok/s via Meta Model API

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 34 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP Atlas, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MA
    Kimi K3Moonshot AI
    Score
    84.20%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 34 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP Atlas, not total model capability
  3. 03
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    83.80%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 34 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP Atlas, not total model capability
  4. 04
    TE
    Tencent
    Score
    83.70%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 34 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP Atlas, not total model capability
  5. 05
    GO
    Google
    Score
    83.60%
    Price
    $1.5 input / $9.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 210.94 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 34 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP Atlas, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MCP Atlas

Muse Spark 1.1 currently leads MCP Atlas with 88.10%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Seed 2.1 Pro
Hy4 preview
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Benchmark rank #1Muse Spark 1.188.10% · $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Kimi K384.20% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro83.80%