llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Unspecified benchmark

LM Arena Document Leaderboard

LM Arena Document is a current leaderboard using Arena Rating.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models38
Model coverage38
MetricArena Rating
EvidenceA

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LM Arena Document Ranking

Higher arena rating ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 38 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Arena Rating
Percentile
Participants
Votes
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicArena Rating1,516.27 rating (1,509.25 rating - 1,523.29 rating)Percentile100.00%Participants38Votes8,794EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicArena Rating1,512.58 rating (1,497.40 rating - 1,527.76 rating)Percentile97.30%Participants38Votes1,403EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,507.32 rating (1,500.90 rating - 1,513.74 rating)Percentile94.59%Participants38Votes27,929EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicArena Rating1,496.08 rating (1,488.22 rating - 1,503.94 rating)Percentile91.89%Participants38Votes8,497EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicArena Rating1,495.04 rating (1,488.66 rating - 1,501.41 rating)Percentile89.19%Participants38Votes22,192EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIArena Rating1,485.72 rating (1,479.48 rating - 1,491.96 rating)Percentile86.49%Participants38Votes21,279EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank07ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIArena Rating1,482.71 rating (1,473.91 rating - 1,491.51 rating)Percentile83.78%Participants38Votes4,818EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank08ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicArena Rating1,482.24 rating (1,476.36 rating - 1,488.11 rating)Percentile81.08%Participants38Votes57,813EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank09ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicArena Rating1,474.79 rating (1,467.89 rating - 1,481.69 rating)Percentile78.38%Participants38Votes11,551EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank10ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIArena Rating1,471.58 rating (1,463.31 rating - 1,479.85 rating)Percentile75.68%Participants38Votes5,787EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIArena Rating1,471.00 rating (1,464.97 rating - 1,477.04 rating)Percentile72.97%Participants38Votes33,331EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank12ModelMEMuse Spark 1.3MetaArena Rating1,470.66 rating (1,452.37 rating - 1,488.95 rating)Percentile70.27%Participants38Votes1,006EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-6 AstraOpenAIArena Rating1,467.52 rating (1,453.26 rating - 1,481.79 rating)Percentile67.57%Participants38Votes1,621EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank14ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicArena Rating1,466.14 rating (1,458.49 rating - 1,473.78 rating)Percentile64.86%Participants38Votes7,411EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank15ModelMEMuse Spark 1.1MetaArena Rating1,464.70 rating (1,455.86 rating - 1,473.54 rating)Percentile62.16%Participants38Votes4,885EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank16ModelGOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,463.27 rating (1,455.40 rating - 1,471.14 rating)Percentile59.46%Participants38Votes6,500EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank17ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicArena Rating1,462.20 rating (1,451.79 rating - 1,472.61 rating)Percentile56.76%Participants38Votes7,981EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank18ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIArena Rating1,456.92 rating (1,448.72 rating - 1,465.11 rating)Percentile54.05%Participants38Votes5,766EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank19ModelGOGemini 3.6 FlashGoogleArena Rating1,456.06 rating (1,445.28 rating - 1,466.83 rating)Percentile51.35%Participants38Votes2,975EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank20ModelXAGrok 4.6xAIArena Rating1,452.33 rating (1,440.31 rating - 1,464.35 rating)Percentile48.65%Participants38Votes2,258EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank21ModelXAGrok 4.5xAIArena Rating1,451.96 rating (1,443.26 rating - 1,460.66 rating)Percentile45.95%Participants38Votes4,965EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank22ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIArena Rating1,450.74 rating (1,443.10 rating - 1,458.37 rating)Percentile43.24%Participants38Votes11,291EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank23ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.5AnthropicArena Rating1,449.81 rating (1,443.69 rating - 1,455.93 rating)Percentile40.54%Participants38Votes31,455EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank24ModelMEMuse SparkMetaArena Rating1,444.19 rating (1,425.90 rating - 1,462.48 rating)Percentile37.84%Participants38Votes1,084EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank25ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamArena Rating1,444.14 rating (1,435.12 rating - 1,453.17 rating)Percentile35.14%Participants38Votes4,591EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank26ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleArena Rating1,443.92 rating (1,438.69 rating - 1,449.14 rating)Percentile32.43%Participants38Votes49,457EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank27ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxArena Rating1,434.79 rating (1,426.53 rating - 1,443.06 rating)Percentile29.73%Participants38Votes6,314EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank28ModelGOGemini 3 ProGoogleArena Rating1,434.09 rating (1,425.18 rating - 1,443.00 rating)Percentile27.03%Participants38Votes10,769EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank29ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIArena Rating1,430.10 rating (1,423.37 rating - 1,436.82 rating)Percentile24.32%Participants38Votes21,569EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026
Rank30ModelGOGemma 4 31BGoogleArena Rating1,424.51 rating (1,416.71 rating - 1,432.31 rating)Percentile21.62%Participants38Votes12,326EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 13, 2026

LM Arena Document Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Document Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LM Arena Document

The Top AI Models for LM Arena Document

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LM Arena Document?

What LM Arena Document measures and how its scores work.

LM Arena Document is a current leaderboard.

It reports Arena Rating in rating units.

Scores are shown in rating. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of A.

Family
lm-arena-document
Modality
Unspecified
Primary category
Unspecified
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LM Arena. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LM Arena Document.

Which model scores highest on LM Arena Document?

Claude Opus 5 is currently ranked first with 1,516.27 rating.

What are the top three models on LM Arena Document?

The current leaders are Claude Opus 5 (1,516.27 rating), Claude Fable 5.1 (1,512.58 rating), and Claude Opus 4.6 (1,507.32 rating).

Which LM Arena Document model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LM Arena Document results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5.6 Luna (215.52 tok/s via OpenAI), Claude Haiku 4.5 (100.00 tok/s via Vertex AI), and GPT-5.2 (100.00 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest arena rating result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LM Arena Document measure?

It reports Arena Rating in rating units.

Is a higher arena rating better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

38 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Opus 51,516.27 rating (1,509.25 rating - 1,523.29 rating)
Rank #2Claude Fable 5.11,512.58 rating (1,497.40 rating - 1,527.76 rating)
Rank #3Claude Opus 4.61,507.32 rating (1,500.90 rating - 1,513.74 rating)
Rank #4Claude Fable 51,496.08 rating (1,488.22 rating - 1,503.94 rating)

Ranking basisThis lm arena document AI model leaderboard uses descending arena rating in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Opus 5Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,516.27 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 38 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Document, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,512.58 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 38 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Document, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,507.32 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 38 compared models
    • 95th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Document, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,496.08 rating
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 38 compared models
    • 92th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Document, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Anthropic
    Arena Rating
    1,495.04 rating
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 38 compared models
    • 89th percentile on this benchmark
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LM Arena Document, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LM Arena Document

Claude Opus 5 currently leads LM Arena Document with 1,516.27 rating. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Fable 5
Claude Opus 4.7
Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 51,516.27 rating · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Fable 5.11,512.58 rating · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Opus 4.61,507.32 rating · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens