llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

SWE-Bench Pro Leaderboard

SWE-Bench Pro is an advanced version of SWE-Bench that evaluates language models on complex, real-world software engineering tasks requiring extended reasoning and multi-step problem solving.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models63
Model coverage63
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

SWE-Bench Pro Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 63 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicScore89.90%Percentile100.00%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicScore81.30%Percentile98.39%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicScore80.00%Percentile96.77%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Mythos PreviewAnthropicScore77.80%Percentile95.16%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore69.20%Percentile93.55%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore67.70%Percentile91.94%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank07ModelRABeam 1.0Reflection AIScore66.10%Percentile90.32%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank08ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore65.70%Percentile88.71%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank09ModelANClaude Haiku 5.5AnthropicScore64.80%Percentile87.10%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank10ModelXAGrok 4.5xAIScore64.70%Percentile85.48%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore64.60%Percentile83.87%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank12ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicScore64.30%Percentile82.26%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore63.40%Percentile80.65%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank14ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicScore63.20%Percentile79.03%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank15ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore62.70%Percentile77.42%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank16ModelACQwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore62.50%Percentile75.81%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank17ModelACQwen3.8 FlashAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore62.50%Percentile74.19%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank18ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIScore62.10%Percentile72.58%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank19ModelACQwen3.8-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore61.70%Percentile70.97%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank20ModelMEMuse Spark 1.1MetaScore61.50%Percentile69.35%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank21ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore60.60%Percentile67.74%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank22ModelSAAtria Dawn PreviewShanghai AI LaboratoryScore59.60%Percentile66.13%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 12, 2026
Rank23ModelPOLaguna S 2.1PoolsideScore59.40%Percentile64.52%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank24ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore59.00%Percentile62.90%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank25ModelGOGemini 3.6 FlashGoogleScore58.70%Percentile61.29%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank26ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIScore58.60%Percentile59.68%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank27ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore58.60%Percentile58.06%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank28ModelZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AIScore58.40%Percentile56.45%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank29ModelTEHy3TencentScore57.90%Percentile54.84%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank30ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIScore57.70%Percentile53.23%Participants63EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

SWE-Bench Pro Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

SWE-Bench Pro Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

SWE-Bench Pro

The Top AI Models for SWE-Bench Pro

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is SWE-Bench Pro?

What SWE-Bench Pro measures and how its scores work.

SWE-Bench Pro is a reasoning benchmark for evaluating language models on software engineering tasks.

It measures performance on complex, real-world software engineering tasks requiring extended reasoning and multi-step problem solving, reported as Score in ratio units.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
SWE-Bench Pro
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about SWE-Bench Pro.

Which model scores highest on SWE-Bench Pro?

Claude Opus 5.5 is currently ranked first with 89.90%.

What are the top three models on SWE-Bench Pro?

The current leaders are Claude Opus 5.5 (89.90%), Claude Sonnet 5.5 (81.30%), and Claude Fable 5 (80.00%).

Which SWE-Bench Pro model has the lowest official input price?

Claude Haiku 5.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among SWE-Bench Pro results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5.6 Luna (215.52 tok/s via OpenAI), MiniMax M2.5 (100.00 tok/s via MiniMax), and Gemini 3.1 Pro (90.00 tok/s via Google).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does SWE-Bench Pro measure?

It measures performance on complex, real-world software engineering tasks requiring extended reasoning and multi-step problem solving, reported as Score in ratio units.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

63 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Opus 5.589.90%
Rank #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.30%
Rank #3Claude Fable 580.00%
Rank #4Claude Mythos Preview77.80%

Ranking basisThis swe-bench pro AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Score
    89.90%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 12.33 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 63 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-Bench Pro, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
    Score
    81.30%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 63 compared models
    • 98th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-Bench Pro, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    80.00%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 63 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-Bench Pro, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    77.80%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 63 compared models
    • 95th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-Bench Pro, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    69.20%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 63 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SWE-Bench Pro, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for SWE-Bench Pro

Claude Opus 5.5 currently leads SWE-Bench Pro with 89.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Fable 5
Claude Mythos Preview
Claude Opus 4.8
Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 5.589.90% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.30% · $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Fable 580.00% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens