productivity benchmark
Job Bench evaluates AI agents on realistic professional tasks requiring multi-step planning, research, and production of work artifacts.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelME | Score64.90% | Percentile100.00% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelTE | Score61.70% | Percentile85.71% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score55.70% | Percentile71.43% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score55.70% | Percentile57.14% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelME | Score54.70% | Percentile42.86% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelAC | Score53.40% | Percentile28.57% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelMA | Score52.90% | Percentile14.29% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAC | Score33.40% | Percentile0.00% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What Job Bench measures and how its scores work.
Job Bench is a productivity benchmark for evaluating AI agents on realistic professional tasks.
It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, on tasks requiring multi-step planning, research, and production of work artifacts.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Job Bench.
Muse Spark 1.3 is currently ranked first with 64.90%.
The current leaders are Muse Spark 1.3 (64.90%), Hy4 preview (61.70%), and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (55.70%).
Qwen3.8 Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.15 input / $0.47 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Qwen3.8 Max (60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra), Muse Spark 1.1 (14.00 tok/s via Meta Model API), and Muse Spark 1.3 (8.44 tok/s via Meta Model API).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, on tasks requiring multi-step planning, research, and production of work artifacts.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
8 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis job bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Muse Spark 1.3 currently leads Job Bench with 64.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.