llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

productivity benchmark

Job Bench Leaderboard

Job Bench evaluates AI agents on realistic professional tasks requiring multi-step planning, research, and production of work artifacts.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models8
Model coverage8
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Job Bench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

8 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMEMuse Spark 1.3MetaScore64.90%Percentile100.00%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore61.70%Percentile85.71%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore55.70%Percentile71.43%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.8 FlashAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore55.70%Percentile57.14%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelMEMuse Spark 1.1MetaScore54.70%Percentile42.86%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore53.40%Percentile28.57%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore52.90%Percentile14.29%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3.8-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore33.40%Percentile0.00%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Job Bench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Job Bench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Job Bench

The Top AI Models for Job Bench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Job Bench?

What Job Bench measures and how its scores work.

Job Bench is a productivity benchmark for evaluating AI agents on realistic professional tasks.

It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, on tasks requiring multi-step planning, research, and production of work artifacts.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Job Bench
Modality
text
Primary category
productivity
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Job Bench.

Which model scores highest on Job Bench?

Muse Spark 1.3 is currently ranked first with 64.90%.

What are the top three models on Job Bench?

The current leaders are Muse Spark 1.3 (64.90%), Hy4 preview (61.70%), and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (55.70%).

Which Job Bench model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen3.8 Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.15 input / $0.47 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Job Bench results?

The fastest matched records are Qwen3.8 Max (60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra), Muse Spark 1.1 (14.00 tok/s via Meta Model API), and Muse Spark 1.3 (8.44 tok/s via Meta Model API).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Job Bench measure?

It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, on tasks requiring multi-step planning, research, and production of work artifacts.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

8 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Muse Spark 1.364.90%
Rank #2Hy4 preview61.70%
Rank #3Qwen3.8-Flash-Next55.70%
Rank #4Qwen3.8 Flash55.70%

Ranking basisThis job bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Muse Spark 1.3Meta
    Score
    64.90%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 8.44 tok/s via Meta Model API

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 8 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Job Bench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    TE
    Hy4 previewTencent
    Score
    61.70%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 8 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Job Bench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    55.70%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 8 compared models
    • 71th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Job Bench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    55.70%
    Price
    $0.15 input / $0.47 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 8 compared models
    • 57th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Job Bench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    54.70%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 14.00 tok/s via Meta Model API

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 8 compared models
    • 43th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Job Bench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Job Bench

Muse Spark 1.3 currently leads Job Bench with 64.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8 Flash
Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmark rank #1Muse Spark 1.364.90% · $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Hy4 preview61.70%
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.8-Flash-Next55.70%