llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Inception model product

Mercury 2

Mercury 2 is a reasoning LLM from Inception built on diffusion-based language model (dLLM) architecture, with tool usage, JSON output, and a 128K context window.

Updated Sep 8, 2026. Default version: Mercury 2

LLMBoard Score37.8Mercury 2
Coverage0%6 benchmark families
Context window128KTokens
Official input price$0.25Inception API

On this page

  • Capability
  • Benchmarks
  • Arena
  • Pricing
  • Runtime
  • Specification
  • Versions
  • Similar models
  • About
  • FAQ

Mercury 2 Capability Profile

This profile uses the model's current scored version. Arena ratings and prices are shown separately.

Mercury 2 LLMBoard score breakdown

Mercury 2 Benchmark Results

Benchmark scores for Mercury 2.

10 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Benchmark
Score
Rank
Participants
Percentile
Evidence
Evaluated
BenchmarkSciCodeScore38.00%Rank18Participants24Percentile26.09%EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
BenchmarkTau2 AirlineScore53.00%Rank20Participants24Percentile17.39%EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
BenchmarkIFBenchScore71.00%Rank23Participants39Percentile42.11%EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
BenchmarkLiveCodeBenchScore67.00%Rank26Participants75Percentile66.22%EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
BenchmarkAIME 2025Score91.10%Rank44Participants119Percentile63.56%EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena WebdevScore1,166.19 ratingRank94Participants97Percentile3.13%EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 5, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Text FactualityScore1,371.21 ratingRank114Participants121Percentile5.83%EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
BenchmarkGPQAScore74.00%Rank124Participants247Percentile50.00%EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena TextScore1,357.63 ratingRank130Participants210Percentile38.28%EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026
BenchmarkLM Arena Text Style ControlScore1,346.51 ratingRank147Participants210Percentile30.14%EvidenceAEvaluatedSep 2, 2026

Mercury 2 Arena Results

Preference and agent-evaluation results for the default version.

30 of 49 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Arena
Category
Rank
Rating / score
Votes
Observations
Result date
ArenawebdevCategorywebdev-reactRank82Rating / score1,155.25Votes804ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 5, 2026
ArenawebdevCategorywebdev-htmlRank93Rating / score1,198.57Votes103ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 5, 2026
ArenawebdevCategoryoverallRank94Rating / score1,166.19Votes908ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 5, 2026
ArenawebdevCategorywebdevRank94Rating / score1,166.19Votes908ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 5, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryenglishRank112Rating / score1,392.82Votes1,128ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategorychineseRank114Rating / score1,412.02Votes200ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryexclude tiesRank114Rating / score1,340.06Votes2,117ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryhard promptsRank114Rating / score1,386.30Votes1,743ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategorynon englishRank114Rating / score1,349.83Votes1,872ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
Arenatext factualityCategoryoverallRank114Rating / score1,371.21Votes3,042ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategorycodingRank123Rating / score1,390.52Votes758ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryenglishRank123Rating / score1,382.34Votes1,170ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryindustry business and management and financial operationsRank124Rating / score1,351.85Votes479ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryindustry software and it servicesRank125Rating / score1,385.49Votes1,054ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryindustry medicine and healthcareRank126Rating / score1,368.69Votes225ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategorychineseRank127Rating / score1,401.79Votes200ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategorymulti turnRank128Rating / score1,356.76Votes518ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryhard prompts englishRank129Rating / score1,376.48Votes701ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryindustry entertainment and sports and mediaRank129Rating / score1,321.32Votes655ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryoverallRank130Rating / score1,357.63Votes3,043ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryexpertRank132Rating / score1,356.23Votes233ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryhard promptsRank132Rating / score1,362.83Votes1,743ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryexclude tiesRank133Rating / score1,315.63Votes2,118ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategorynon englishRank135Rating / score1,332.42Votes1,873ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryinstruction followingRank138Rating / score1,324.24Votes839ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategoryindustry life and physical and social scienceRank139Rating / score1,350.24Votes461ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
ArenatextCategorylonger queryRank141Rating / score1,331.37Votes844ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategorycodingRank141Rating / score1,393.71Votes758ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryenglishRank142Rating / score1,370.14Votes1,170ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026
Arenatext style controlCategoryindustry entertainment and sports and mediaRank142Rating / score1,315.47Votes655ObservationsN/AResult dateSep 2, 2026

Mercury 2 Pricing

Official vendor API pricing appears first, followed by individual provider offers.

Official API
$0.25 input, $0.75 output per 1M
Official provider
Inception
Lowest third-party
From $0.25 input, $0.75 output per 1M via NanoGPT
Tracked offerings
5
5 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Provider
Provider model ID
Region
Input / 1M
Output / 1M
Context
Updated
ProviderNanoGPTProvider model IDmercury-2RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.25Output / 1M$0.75Context128KUpdatedSep 8, 2026
ProviderInceptionProvider model IDmercury-2RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.25Output / 1M$0.75Context128KUpdatedSep 8, 2026
ProviderOpenRouterProvider model IDinception/mercury-2RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.25Output / 1M$0.75Context128KUpdatedSep 8, 2026
ProviderVercel AI GatewayProvider model IDinception/mercury-2RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.25Output / 1M$0.75Context128KUpdatedSep 8, 2026
ProviderVenice AIProvider model IDmercury-2RegionglobalInput / 1M$0.3125Output / 1M$0.9375Context128KUpdatedSep 8, 2026

Official prices use only the vendor's configured official Provider and positive standard USD PAYG rates. Third-party offers remain explicitly labeled.

Mercury 2 Runtime Performance

Provider-specific output speed and catalog latency for Mercury 2. Runtime does not affect the capability score.

1 row
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Provider
Output Speed
Catalog Latency
Max Input
Max Output
Updated
ProviderInceptionOutput Speed346.33 tok/sCatalog Latency1.64 sMax Input128KMax Output8.2KUpdatedSep 8, 2026

Output Speed is generated output tokens received per second. Catalog latency is reported separately from observed provider TTFT.

Mercury 2 Specifications

Technical details for the model's default version.

Version
Mercury 2
Released
Feb 24, 2026
Knowledge cutoff
Unknown
Parameters
N/A
Context window
128K
Max output
8.2K
Inputs
text
Outputs
text
Open weights
No
License
Proprietary

Mercury 2 Versions

Available versions of this model. The score column identifies the version used in the overall ranking.

1 row
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Version
Released
LLMBoard
Parameters
Context
Max output
Open weights
License
VersionMercury 2ReleasedFeb 24, 2026LLMBoard37.76ParametersN/AContext128KMax output8.2KOpen weightsNoLicenseProprietary

Models similar to Mercury 2

Recommendations prioritize the same model type and family, then the closest LLMBoard score.

#153-0.26
AN

Claude Sonnet 3.7

Anthropic

37.50 LLMBoard

Details
#154-0.42
ZA

GLM 4.7 Flash

Zhipu AI

37.34 LLMBoard

Details
#155-0.49
NV

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA

37.27 LLMBoard

Details
#156-0.86
GO

Gemma 4 12B

Google

36.90 LLMBoard

Details
#151+0.92
GO

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google

38.68 LLMBoard

Details
#150+0.95
AN

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic

38.71 LLMBoard

Details

What is Mercury 2?

Key information about Mercury 2 and its available data.

Mercury 2 is a reasoning LLM from Inception built on diffusion-based language model (dLLM) architecture. It refines multiple text blocks simultaneously rather than generating text token-by-token and supports tool usage, JSON output, and a 128K context window.

Data as of 2026-09-08.

FAQ

Common questions about Mercury 2.

When was Mercury 2 released?

Mercury 2's default version was released on Feb 24, 2026.

How much does Mercury 2 cost?

Mercury 2's official API price is $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens via Inception. The lowest tracked third-party offer starts at $0.25 input and $0.75 output via NanoGPT.

Who created Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 was created by Inception.

What is the context window for Mercury 2?

The default version has a 128K token context window.

Is Mercury 2 open weight?

No. The default version is not marked as having publicly available weights.

How many API providers offer Mercury 2?

5 provider offerings are linked to the default version.