llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

math benchmark

SciCode Leaderboard

SciCode is a research coding benchmark with 338 subproblems from 80 scientific problems across 16 natural science sub-fields.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models24
Model coverage24
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

SciCode Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

24 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore59.80%Percentile100.00%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleScore59.00%Percentile95.65%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore57.80%Percentile91.30%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore53.50%Percentile86.96%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore52.20%Percentile82.61%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore51.30%Percentile78.26%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelTMInkling-SmallThinking Machines LabScore48.70%Percentile73.91%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore48.70%Percentile69.57%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelMAKimi K2-Thinking-0905Moonshot AIScore44.80%Percentile65.22%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelNVNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)NVIDIAScore44.60%Percentile60.87%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore43.60%Percentile56.52%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelNVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIAScore42.05%Percentile52.17%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelZAGLM-4.5Zhipu AIScore41.70%Percentile47.83%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelMIMiniMax M2.1MiniMaxScore39.00%Percentile43.48%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelIBIBM Granite 4.2 30BIBMScore38.76%Percentile39.13%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelCONorth Mini Code 1.0CohereScore38.20%Percentile34.78%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelCOCommand A+CohereScore38.00%Percentile30.43%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelINMercury 2InceptionScore38.00%Percentile26.09%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelZAGLM-4.5-AirZhipu AIScore37.30%Percentile21.74%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelIBIBM Granite 4.2 8BIBMScore36.09%Percentile17.39%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelMIMiniMax M2MiniMaxScore36.00%Percentile13.04%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelNVNemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)NVIDIAScore33.30%Percentile8.70%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelNVNemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)NVIDIAScore32.60%Percentile4.35%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelIBIBM Granite 4.2 3BIBMScore24.11%Percentile0.00%Participants24EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

SciCode Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

SciCode Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

SciCode

The Top AI Models for SciCode

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is SciCode?

What SciCode measures and how its scores work.

SciCode challenges language models to code solutions for scientific problems, including mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and materials science.

It measures performance involving knowledge recall, reasoning, and code synthesis, reported as Score in ratio units.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
SciCode
Modality
text
Primary category
math
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about SciCode.

Which model scores highest on SciCode?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 59.80%.

What are the top three models on SciCode?

The current leaders are Seed 2.1 Pro (59.80%), Gemini 3.1 Pro (59.00%), and Seed 2.1 Turbo (57.80%).

Which SciCode model has the lowest official input price?

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $0.80 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among SciCode results?

The fastest matched records are Mercury 2 (346.33 tok/s via Inception), MiniMax M2.1 (100.00 tok/s via MiniMax), and MiniMax M2 (70.00 tok/s via MiniMax).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does SciCode measure?

It measures performance involving knowledge recall, reasoning, and code synthesis, reported as Score in ratio units.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

24 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro59.80%
Rank #2Gemini 3.1 Pro59.00%
Rank #3Seed 2.1 Turbo57.80%
Rank #4Qwen3.7 Max53.50%

Ranking basisThis scicode AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    59.80%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 24 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SciCode, not total model capability
  2. 02
    GO
    Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle
    Score
    59.00%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.79 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 24 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SciCode, not total model capability
  3. 03
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    57.80%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 24 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SciCode, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    53.50%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 24 compared models
    • 87th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SciCode, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    52.20%
    Price
    $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 1.24 tok/s via Moonshot AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 24 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SciCode, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for SciCode

Seed 2.1 Pro currently leads SciCode with 59.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Seed 2.1 Turbo
Qwen3.7 Max
Kimi K2.6
Benchmark rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro59.80%
Benchmark rank #2Gemini 3.1 Pro59.00% · $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Seed 2.1 Turbo57.80%