Arena ranking
Browse Document Style Control results, model ratings and supporting selection context.
Data as of 2026-09-08
This source leaderboard ranking orders models by their original Arena rank rather than an aggregated benchmark score.
Rank | Model | Source Arena rating | LLMBoard Score | Votes | Official input / 1M | Output speed |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Source Arena rating1,506.74 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes5,792 | Official input / 1M$10 | Output speed43.18 tok/s |
| Rank02 | ModelAN | Source Arena rating1,496.83 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes18,990 | Official input / 1M$5 | Output speed42.00 tok/s |
| Rank03 | ModelAN | Source Arena rating1,494.69 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes37,271 | Official input / 1M$5 | Output speed123.15 tok/s |
| Rank04 | ModelAN | Source Arena rating1,492.66 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes1,663 | Official input / 1M$5 | Output speed62.88 tok/s |
| Rank05 | ModelAN | Source Arena rating1,486.56 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes8,388 | Official input / 1M$5 | Output speed42.00 tok/s |
| Rank06 | ModelME | Source Arena rating1,482.78 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes2,054 | Official input / 1M$1.25 | Output speed14.00 tok/s |
| Rank07 | ModelOP | Source Arena rating1,482.26 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes1,969 | Official input / 1M$2 | Output speed99.35 tok/s |
| Rank08 | ModelOP | Source Arena rating1,481.34 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes1,152 | Official input / 1M$4 | Output speed2.36 tok/s |
| Rank09 | ModelAN | Source Arena rating1,478.63 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes3,601 | Official input / 1M$2 | Output speed42.00 tok/s |
| Rank10 | ModelOP | Source Arena rating1,477.77 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes16,816 | Official input / 1M$5 | Output speed134.94 tok/s |
| Rank11 | ModelAN | Source Arena rating1,477.53 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes54,427 | Official input / 1M$3 | Output speed7.67 tok/s |
| Rank12 | ModelOP | Source Arena rating1,469.34 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes29,809 | Official input / 1M$2.5 | Output speed50.00 tok/s |
| Rank13 | ModelOP | Source Arena rating1,466.73 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes1,888 | Official input / 1M$0.20 | Output speed41.87 tok/s |
| Rank14 | ModelME | Source Arena rating1,466.33 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes1,078 | Official input / 1MN/A | Output speedN/A |
| Rank15 | ModelAN | Source Arena rating1,464.26 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes7,965 | Official input / 1M$5 | Output speed42.00 tok/s |
| Rank16 | ModelGO | Source Arena rating1,462.28 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes3,689 | Official input / 1M$1.5 | Output speed210.94 tok/s |
| Rank17 | ModelXA | Source Arena rating1,461.97 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes2,435 | Official input / 1M$2 | Output speed80.00 tok/s |
| Rank18 | ModelGO | Source Arena rating1,459.81 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes45,162 | Official input / 1M$2 | Output speed43.79 tok/s |
| Rank19 | ModelOP | Source Arena rating1,455.45 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes8,442 | Official input / 1MN/A | Output speed206.89 tok/s |
| Rank20 | ModelGO | Source Arena rating1,450.50 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes10,739 | Official input / 1MN/A | Output speed90.00 tok/s |
| Rank21 | ModelMA | Source Arena rating1,449.51 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes11,181 | Official input / 1M$0.95 | Output speed1.24 tok/s |
| Rank22 | ModelAC | Source Arena rating1,448.53 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes3,088 | Official input / 1M$0.50 | Output speedN/A |
| Rank23 | ModelAN | Source Arena rating1,446.38 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes28,634 | Official input / 1M$3 | Output speed42.00 tok/s |
| Rank24 | ModelGO | Source Arena rating1,445.18 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes10,577 | Official input / 1MN/A | Output speed22.86 tok/s |
| Rank25 | ModelGO | Source Arena rating1,440.79 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes7,173 | Official input / 1M$0.50 | Output speed124.32 tok/s |
| Rank26 | ModelXA | Source Arena rating1,439.71 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes18,666 | Official input / 1MN/A | Output speedN/A |
| Rank27 | ModelMA | Source Arena rating1,434.87 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes19,891 | Official input / 1MN/A | Output speedN/A |
| Rank28 | ModelMI | Source Arena rating1,433.52 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes6,263 | Official input / 1M$0.30 | Output speed6.61 tok/s |
| Rank29 | ModelGO | Source Arena rating1,430.04 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes24,963 | Official input / 1M$1.25 | Output speed85.00 tok/s |
| Rank30 | ModelOP | Source Arena rating1,425.72 | LLMBoard ScoreN/A | Votes28,068 | Official input / 1M$1.75 | Output speed100.00 tok/s |
This leaderboard overview compares the source ranking, rating gaps and voting activity.
Use intervals and vote counts to judge how firmly each leaderboard position is supported; source ratings remain separate from the benchmark ranking.
Vendor representation among the top-ranked models in this leaderboard.
A practical summary of the first five entries in this document style control AI model leaderboard, with benchmark evidence and pricing kept in context.
Common questions about the Document Style Control Leaderboard.
Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 1,506.74 Rating.
The current leaders are Claude Fable 5 (rank #1), Claude Opus 4.7 (rank #2), and Claude Opus 4.6 (rank #3).
GPT-5.6-Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.2 per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are GPT-5.1 (369.03 tok/s via OpenAI), Gemini 3.5 Flash (210.94 tok/s via Google), and GPT-5.5-Instant (206.89 tok/s via OpenAI).
No. Source Arena results describe a particular task or preference signal. Capability benchmarks, prices and runtime can produce different rankings.
This source-native ranking follows the original source metric. Benchmark evidence is shown separately and is not substituted for the source result.
This page currently compares 33 models.
A model may not yet have a matching Arena result, or multiple version results may resolve to the same model.
Ranking basisThis document style control AI model leaderboard uses the source Arena rating and rank. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Fable 5 currently leads the document style control ranking at 1,506.74. Compare evidence coverage, source activity and price separately before choosing a model for production.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.