llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

math benchmark

DROP Leaderboard

DROP (Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs) is a reading comprehension benchmark with crowdsourced, adversarially-created questions requiring discrete reasoning over paragraph content.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models30
Model coverage30
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

DROP Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelDEDeepSeek-V3DeepSeekScore91.60%Percentile100.00%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude 3.5 SonnetAnthropicScore87.10%Percentile96.55%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude 3.5 SonnetAnthropicScore87.10%Percentile93.10%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelXIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiScore86.30%Percentile89.66%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelOPGPT-4 TurboOpenAIScore86.00%Percentile86.21%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelAMNova ProAmazonScore85.40%Percentile82.76%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelMELlama 3.1 405B InstructMetaScore84.80%Percentile79.31%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelOPGPT-4oOpenAIScore83.40%Percentile75.86%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelANClaude 3.5 HaikuAnthropicScore83.10%Percentile72.41%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelANClaude 3 OpusAnthropicScore83.10%Percentile68.97%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-4OpenAIScore80.90%Percentile65.52%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelAMNova LiteAmazonScore80.20%Percentile62.07%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-4o miniOpenAIScore79.70%Percentile58.62%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelMELlama 3.1 70B InstructMetaScore79.60%Percentile55.17%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelAMNova MicroAmazonScore79.30%Percentile51.72%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelMELongCat-Flash-ChatMeituanScore79.06%Percentile48.28%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelANClaude 3 SonnetAnthropicScore78.90%Percentile44.83%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelANClaude 3 HaikuAnthropicScore78.40%Percentile41.38%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelMIPhi 4MicrosoftScore75.50%Percentile37.93%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelGOGemini 1.5 ProGoogleScore74.90%Percentile34.48%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelOPGPT-3.5 TurboOpenAIScore70.20%Percentile31.03%Participants30EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelGOGemma 3n E4BGoogleScore60.80%Percentile27.59%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelGOGemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT PreviewGoogleScore60.80%Percentile24.14%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelMELlama 3.1 8B InstructMetaScore59.50%Percentile20.69%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelIBGranite 3.3 8B InstructIBMScore59.36%Percentile17.24%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelGOGemma 3n E2BGoogleScore53.90%Percentile13.79%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelGOGemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)GoogleScore53.90%Percentile10.34%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelIBIBM Granite 4.0 Tiny PreviewIBMScore46.20%Percentile6.90%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank29ModelIBGranite 3.3 8B BaseIBMScore36.14%Percentile3.45%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank30ModelBAERNIE 4.5BaiduScore28.60%Percentile0.00%Participants30EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

DROP Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

DROP Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

DROP

The Top AI Models for DROP

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is DROP?

What DROP measures and how its scores work.

DROP is a reading comprehension benchmark focused on discrete reasoning over paragraphs.

It measures performance on questions requiring reference resolution and discrete operations such as addition, counting, or sorting, along with comprehensive paragraph understanding.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
DROP
Modality
text
Primary category
math
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about DROP.

Which model scores highest on DROP?

DeepSeek-V3 is currently ranked first with 91.60%.

What are the top three models on DROP?

The current leaders are DeepSeek-V3 (91.60%), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (87.10%), and Claude 3.5 Sonnet (87.10%).

Which DROP model has the lowest official input price?

Nova Micro has the lowest matched official input price at $0.04 input / $0.14 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among DROP results?

The fastest matched records are Llama 3.1 8B Instruct (2,047.00 tok/s via Cerebras), Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (1,204.00 tok/s via Cerebras), and GPT-4 (104.00 tok/s via Azure).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does DROP measure?

It measures performance on questions requiring reference resolution and discrete operations such as addition, counting, or sorting, along with comprehensive paragraph understanding.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

30 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1DeepSeek-V391.60%
Rank #2Claude 3.5 Sonnet87.10%
Rank #3Claude 3.5 Sonnet87.10%
Rank #4MiMo-V2.5-Pro86.30%

Ranking basisThis drop AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    DE
    DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek
    Score
    91.60%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 30 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DROP, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic
    Score
    87.10%
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 30 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DROP, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    87.10%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 30 compared models
    • 93th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DROP, not total model capability
  4. 04
    XI
    Xiaomi
    Score
    86.30%
    Price
    $0.44 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 5.27 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 30 compared models
    • 90th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DROP, not total model capability
  5. 05
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    86.00%
    Price
    $10 input / $30 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 30 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DROP, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for DROP

DeepSeek-V3 currently leads DROP with 91.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
GPT-4 Turbo
Benchmark rank #1DeepSeek-V391.60% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek
Benchmark rank #2Claude 3.5 Sonnet87.10% · Up to 42.00 tok/s via Google
Benchmark rank #3Claude 3.5 Sonnet87.10% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via Anthropic