llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

image to text benchmark

DocVQA Leaderboard

DocVQA is a Visual Question Answering benchmark containing 50,000 questions defined on 12,000+ document images.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models28
Model coverage28
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

DocVQA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

28 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore96.40%Percentile100.00%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen2.5 VL 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore95.70%Percentile96.30%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude 3.5 SonnetAnthropicScore95.20%Percentile92.59%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen2.5-Omni-7BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore95.20%Percentile88.89%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelMAMistral Small 3.2 24B InstructMistral AIScore94.86%Percentile85.19%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen2.5 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore94.80%Percentile81.48%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelMELlama 4 MaverickMetaScore94.40%Percentile77.78%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelMELlama 4 ScoutMetaScore94.40%Percentile74.07%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelXAGrok-2xAIScore93.60%Percentile70.37%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelAMNova ProAmazonScore93.50%Percentile66.67%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelDEDeepSeek VL2DeepSeekScore93.30%Percentile62.96%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelMAPixtral LargeMistral AIScore93.30%Percentile59.26%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelXAGrok-2 minixAIScore93.20%Percentile55.56%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelMIPhi-4-multimodal-instructMicrosoftScore93.20%Percentile51.85%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelOPGPT-4oOpenAIScore92.80%Percentile48.15%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelAMNova LiteAmazonScore92.40%Percentile44.44%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelDEDeepSeek VL2 SmallDeepSeekScore92.30%Percentile40.74%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelCONorth Micro Vision InstructCohereScore92.10%Percentile37.04%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelLALFM2.5-VL-3BLiquid AIScore91.10%Percentile33.33%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelMAPixtral-12BMistral AIScore90.70%Percentile29.63%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelMELlama 3.2 90B InstructMetaScore90.10%Percentile25.93%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelDEDeepSeek VL2 TinyDeepSeekScore88.90%Percentile22.22%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelMELlama 3.2 11B InstructMetaScore88.40%Percentile18.52%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelGOGemma 3 12BGoogleScore87.10%Percentile14.81%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelGOGemma 3 27BGoogleScore86.60%Percentile11.11%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelXAGrok-1.5xAIScore85.60%Percentile7.41%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelXAGrok-1.5VxAIScore85.60%Percentile3.70%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelGOGemma 3 4BGoogleScore75.80%Percentile0.00%Participants28EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

DocVQA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

DocVQA Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

DocVQA

The Top AI Models for DocVQA

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is DocVQA?

What DocVQA measures and how its scores work.

DocVQA is a dataset and benchmark for answering questions about document images.

It measures AI's ability to understand document structure and content, comprehend document layout, and perform information retrieval to answer questions about document images, using Score as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
DocVQA
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
image to text
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about DocVQA.

Which model scores highest on DocVQA?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is currently ranked first with 96.40%.

What are the top three models on DocVQA?

The current leaders are Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (96.40%), Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct (95.70%), and Claude 3.5 Sonnet (95.20%).

Which DocVQA model has the lowest official input price?

Nova Lite has the lowest matched official input price at $0.06 input / $0.24 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among DocVQA results?

The fastest matched records are Llama 4 Scout (776.10 tok/s via Groq), Llama 4 Maverick (307.30 tok/s via Groq), and GPT-4o (132.00 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does DocVQA measure?

It measures AI's ability to understand document structure and content, comprehend document layout, and perform information retrieval to answer questions about document images, using Score as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

28 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct96.40%
Rank #2Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct95.70%
Rank #3Claude 3.5 Sonnet95.20%
Rank #4Qwen2.5-Omni-7B95.20%

Ranking basisThis docvqa AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    96.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 28 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DocVQA, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen2.5 VL 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    95.70%
    Price
    $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 28 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DocVQA, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    95.20%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 28 compared models
    • 93th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DocVQA, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    95.20%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 28 compared models
    • 89th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DocVQA, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MA
    Mistral AI
    Score
    94.86%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 28 compared models
    • 85th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DocVQA, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for DocVQA

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct currently leads DocVQA with 96.40%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Benchmark rank #1Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct96.40%
Benchmark rank #2Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct95.70% · $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude 3.5 Sonnet95.20% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via Anthropic