llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

ARC-C Leaderboard

ARC-C is a multiple-choice question-answering benchmark containing grade-school level science questions that require advanced reasoning.

Updated Sep 7, 2026

Models34
Model coverage34
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

ARC-C Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 34 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelXIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiScore97.20%Percentile100.00%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMELlama 3.1 405B InstructMetaScore96.90%Percentile96.97%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude 3 OpusAnthropicScore96.40%Percentile93.94%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelMELlama 3.1 70B InstructMetaScore94.80%Percentile90.91%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelAMNova ProAmazonScore94.80%Percentile87.88%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelANClaude 3 SonnetAnthropicScore93.20%Percentile84.85%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelALJamba 1.5 LargeAI21 LabsScore93.00%Percentile81.82%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelAMNova LiteAmazonScore92.40%Percentile78.79%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelMAMistral Small 3 24B BaseMistral AIScore91.29%Percentile75.76%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelMIPhi-3.5-MoE-instructMicrosoftScore91.00%Percentile72.73%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelAMNova MicroAmazonScore90.20%Percentile69.70%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelANClaude 3 HaikuAnthropicScore89.20%Percentile66.67%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelALJamba 1.5 MiniAI21 LabsScore85.70%Percentile63.64%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelMIPhi-3.5-mini-instructMicrosoftScore84.60%Percentile60.61%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelMIPhi 4 MiniMicrosoftScore83.70%Percentile57.58%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelMELlama 3.1 8B InstructMetaScore83.40%Percentile54.55%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelMELlama 3.2 3B InstructMetaScore78.60%Percentile51.52%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelMAMinistral 8B InstructMistral AIScore71.90%Percentile48.48%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelGOGemma 2 27BGoogleScore71.40%Percentile45.45%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelCOCommand R+CohereScore70.99%Percentile42.42%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelACQwen2.5-Coder 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.50%Percentile39.39%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelACQwen2.5 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.40%Percentile36.36%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank23ModelNVLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNVIDIAScore69.20%Percentile33.33%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank24ModelACQwen2 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore68.90%Percentile30.30%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank25ModelGOGemma 2 9BGoogleScore68.40%Percentile27.27%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank26ModelACQwen2.5 14B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore67.30%Percentile24.24%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank27ModelNRHermes 3 70BNous ResearchScore65.53%Percentile21.21%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank28ModelGOGemma 3n E4BGoogleScore61.60%Percentile18.18%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank29ModelGOGemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT PreviewGoogleScore61.60%Percentile15.15%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank30ModelACQwen2.5-Coder 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore60.90%Percentile12.12%Participants34EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

ARC-C Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

ARC-C Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

ARC-C

The Top AI Models for ARC-C

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is ARC-C?

What ARC-C measures and how its scores work.

ARC-C is the Challenge Set of the AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC), comprising questions answered incorrectly by both retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms.

It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on questions testing commonsense reasoning abilities in AI systems.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
ARC-C
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about ARC-C.

Which model scores highest on ARC-C?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is currently ranked first with 97.20%.

What are the top three models on ARC-C?

The current leaders are MiMo-V2.5-Pro (97.20%), Llama 3.1 405B Instruct (96.90%), and Claude 3 Opus (96.40%).

Which ARC-C model has the lowest official input price?

Nova Micro has the lowest matched official input price at $0.04 input / $0.14 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among ARC-C results?

The fastest matched records are Llama 3.1 8B Instruct (2,047.00 tok/s via Cerebras), Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (1,204.00 tok/s via Cerebras), and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (171.50 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does ARC-C measure?

It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on questions testing commonsense reasoning abilities in AI systems.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

34 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1MiMo-V2.5-Pro97.20%
Rank #2Llama 3.1 405B Instruct96.90%
Rank #3Claude 3 Opus96.40%
Rank #4Llama 3.1 70B Instruct94.80%

Ranking basisThis arc-c AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    XI
    MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
    Score
    97.20%
    Price
    $0.44 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 5.27 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 34 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ARC-C, not total model capability
  2. 02
    ME
    Llama 3.1 405B InstructMeta
    Score
    96.90%
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 34 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ARC-C, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    96.40%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 34 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ARC-C, not total model capability
  4. 04
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    94.80%
    Speed
    Up to 1,204.00 tok/s via Cerebras

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 34 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ARC-C, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AM
    Amazon
    Score
    94.80%
    Price
    $0.80 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 34 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ARC-C, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for ARC-C

MiMo-V2.5-Pro currently leads ARC-C with 97.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude 3 Opus
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Nova Pro
Benchmark rank #1MiMo-V2.5-Pro97.20% · $0.44 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Llama 3.1 405B Instruct96.90% · Up to 42.00 tok/s via Google
Benchmark rank #3Claude 3 Opus96.40% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via Anthropic