llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Workspace Bench Leaderboard

Workspace Bench evaluates AI agents on workplace tasks involving multi-step planning, file processing, and tool use across office and productivity workflows.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Workspace Bench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

4 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore67.70%Percentile100.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore60.20%Percentile66.67%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore54.70%Percentile33.33%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore53.00%Percentile0.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Workspace Bench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Workspace Bench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Workspace Bench

The Top AI Models for Workspace Bench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Workspace Bench?

What Workspace Bench measures and how its scores work.

Workspace Bench is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on workplace tasks across realistic office and productivity workflows.

It measures performance on multi-step planning, file processing, and tool use tasks using Score, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Workspace Bench
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Workspace Bench.

Which model scores highest on Workspace Bench?

Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 67.70%.

What are the top three models on Workspace Bench?

The current leaders are Qwen3.8 Max (67.70%), Hy4 preview (60.20%), and Seed 2.1 Turbo (54.70%).

Which Workspace Bench model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen3.8 Max has the lowest matched official input price at $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Workspace Bench results?

The fastest matched records are Qwen3.8 Max (60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Workspace Bench measure?

It measures performance on multi-step planning, file processing, and tool use tasks using Score, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

4 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen3.8 Max67.70%
Rank #2Hy4 preview60.20%
Rank #3Seed 2.1 Turbo54.70%
Rank #4Seed 2.1 Pro53.00%

Ranking basisThis workspace bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    67.70%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 60.87 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 4 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Workspace Bench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    TE
    Hy4 previewTencent
    Score
    60.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 4 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Workspace Bench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    54.70%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 4 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Workspace Bench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    53.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 4 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Workspace Bench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Workspace Bench

Qwen3.8 Max currently leads Workspace Bench with 67.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Seed 2.1 Turbo
Seed 2.1 Pro
Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.8 Max67.70% · $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Hy4 preview60.20%
Benchmark rank #3Seed 2.1 Turbo54.70%