llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

Video-MME Leaderboard

Video-MME is a multimodal benchmark for evaluating video analysis by MLLMs using 900 videos, 2,700 human-annotated question-answer pairs, and diverse video inputs.

Updated Sep 7, 2026

Models17
Model coverage17
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Video-MME Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

17 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore89.20%Percentile100.00%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore89.00%Percentile93.75%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore88.00%Percentile87.50%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelXIMiMo-V2.5XiaomiScore87.70%Percentile81.25%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore87.40%Percentile75.00%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore85.40%Percentile68.75%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelGOGemini 2.5 ProGoogleScore84.80%Percentile62.50%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore84.20%Percentile56.25%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelGOGemini 1.5 ProGoogleScore78.60%Percentile50.00%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelAMNova 2 OmniAmazonScore77.90%Percentile43.75%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelGOGemini 1.5 FlashGoogleScore76.10%Percentile37.50%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore74.50%Percentile31.25%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore73.30%Percentile25.00%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelACQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore71.80%Percentile18.75%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelACQwen3 VL 8B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore71.40%Percentile12.50%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelGOGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGoogleScore66.20%Percentile6.25%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelMIPhi-4-multimodal-instructMicrosoftScore55.00%Percentile0.00%Participants17EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Video-MME Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Video-MME Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Video-MME

The Top AI Models for Video-MME

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Video-MME?

What Video-MME measures and how its scores work.

Video-MME is a benchmark for evaluating Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in video analysis, covering 6 primary visual domains and 30 subfields.

It measures model performance on video-analysis questions across temporal dimensions from 11 seconds to 1 hour using video frames, subtitles, and audio, with the metric reported as Score in ratio units.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Video-MME
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Video-MME.

Which model scores highest on Video-MME?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 89.20%.

What are the top three models on Video-MME?

The current leaders are Seed 2.1 Pro (89.20%), Seed 2.1 Turbo (89.00%), and Qwen3.7-Plus (88.00%).

Which Video-MME model has the lowest official input price?

MiMo-V2.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Video-MME results?

The fastest matched records are Gemini 1.5 Flash (150.00 tok/s via Google), Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (150.00 tok/s via Google), and Gemini 1.5 Pro (85.00 tok/s via Google).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Video-MME measure?

It measures model performance on video-analysis questions across temporal dimensions from 11 seconds to 1 hour using video frames, subtitles, and audio, with the metric reported as Score in ratio units.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

17 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro89.20%
Rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo89.00%
Rank #3Qwen3.7-Plus88.00%
Rank #4MiMo-V2.587.70%

Ranking basisThis video-mme AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    89.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 17 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Video-MME, not total model capability
  2. 02
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    89.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 17 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Video-MME, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    88.00%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 17 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Video-MME, not total model capability
  4. 04
    XI
    Xiaomi
    Score
    87.70%
    Price
    $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 5.39 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 17 compared models
    • 81th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Video-MME, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    87.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 17 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Video-MME, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Video-MME

Seed 2.1 Pro currently leads Video-MME with 89.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.7-Plus
MiMo-V2.5
Kimi K2.5
Benchmark rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro89.20%
Benchmark rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo89.00%
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.7-Plus88.00% · $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens