llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Tau-bench Leaderboard

Tau-bench is a benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in retail and airline domains.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models6
Model coverage6
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Tau-bench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

6 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelSTStep-3.5-FlashStepFunScore88.20%Percentile100.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelZAGLM-4.7Zhipu AIScore87.40%Percentile80.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelXIMiMo-V2-FlashXiaomiScore80.30%Percentile60.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelZAGLM-4.7-FlashZhipu AIScore79.50%Percentile40.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelMIMiniMax M2MiniMaxScore77.20%Percentile20.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelOPo3OpenAIScore63.00%Percentile0.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Tau-bench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Tau-bench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Tau-bench

The Top AI Models for Tau-bench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Tau-bench?

What Tau-bench measures and how its scores work.

Tau-bench tests language agents in dynamic conversations with users, API tools, and domain-specific policy guidelines.

It measures agents' ability to follow domain-specific rules and evaluates the consistency and reliability of their behavior over multiple trials using a Score reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Tau-bench
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Tau-bench.

Which model scores highest on Tau-bench?

Step-3.5-Flash is currently ranked first with 88.20%.

What are the top three models on Tau-bench?

The current leaders are Step-3.5-Flash (88.20%), GLM-4.7 (87.40%), and MiMo-V2-Flash (80.30%).

Which Tau-bench model has the lowest official input price?

Step-3.5-Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Tau-bench results?

The fastest matched records are MiniMax M2 (70.00 tok/s via MiniMax), GLM-4.7-Flash (50.00 tok/s via ZAI), and o3 (50.00 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Tau-bench measure?

It measures agents' ability to follow domain-specific rules and evaluates the consistency and reliability of their behavior over multiple trials using a Score reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

6 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Step-3.5-Flash88.20%
Rank #2GLM-4.787.40%
Rank #3MiMo-V2-Flash80.30%
Rank #4GLM-4.7-Flash79.50%

Ranking basisThis tau-bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ST
    Step-3.5-FlashStepFun
    Score
    88.20%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 21.16 tok/s via StepFun

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 6 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau-bench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    ZA
    GLM-4.7Zhipu AI
    Score
    87.40%
    Price
    $0.60 input / $2.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 6 compared models
    • 80th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau-bench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    XI
    Xiaomi
    Score
    80.30%
    Price
    $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 6 compared models
    • 60th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau-bench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    ZA
    Zhipu AI
    Score
    79.50%
    Speed
    Up to 50.00 tok/s via ZAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 6 compared models
    • 40th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau-bench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MI
    MiniMax
    Score
    77.20%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 70.00 tok/s via MiniMax

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 6 compared models
    • 20th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau-bench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Tau-bench

Step-3.5-Flash currently leads Tau-bench with 88.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

MiMo-V2-Flash
GLM-4.7-Flash
MiniMax M2
Benchmark rank #1Step-3.5-Flash88.20% · $0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2GLM-4.787.40% · $0.60 input / $2.2 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3MiMo-V2-Flash80.30% · $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens