agents benchmark
Program Bench evaluates code-generation agents on recreating program behavior from a compiled binary and documentation across 200 tasks, with submissions judged against more than 248,000 fuzz-generated behavioral tests.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMA | Score77.80% | Percentile100.00% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelZA | Score63.70% | Percentile83.33% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelMA | Score53.60% | Percentile66.67% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelBY | Score50.30% | Percentile50.00% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelBY | Score49.40% | Percentile33.33% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelZA | Score19.00% | Percentile16.67% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelTE | Score17.50% | Percentile0.00% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What Program Bench measures and how its scores work.
Program Bench is a benchmark for code-generation agents covering tasks ranging from small CLI tools to systems such as FFmpeg and SQLite.
It measures how well agents recreate program behavior from a compiled binary and documentation, using Score reported as a ratio against more than 248,000 fuzz-generated behavioral tests.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Program Bench.
Kimi K3 is currently ranked first with 77.80%.
The current leaders are Kimi K3 (77.80%), GLM-5.2 (63.70%), and Kimi K2.7 Code (53.60%).
Kimi K2.7 Code has the lowest matched official input price at $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are GLM-5.3 (472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI) and GLM-5.2 (3.96 tok/s via ZAI).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures how well agents recreate program behavior from a compiled binary and documentation, using Score reported as a ratio against more than 248,000 fuzz-generated behavioral tests.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
7 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis program bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Kimi K3 currently leads Program Bench with 77.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.