llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

PostTrainBench Leaderboard

PostTrainBench evaluates a model's ability to autonomously post-train base models by completing data synthesis, training, evaluation, and iteration within a time budget.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models7
Model coverage7
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

PostTrainBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

7 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelZAGLM-5.3Zhipu AIScore39.80%Percentile100.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore37.10%Percentile83.33%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore36.60%Percentile66.67%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore35.60%Percentile50.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIScore34.30%Percentile33.33%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore18.30%Percentile16.67%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore16.50%Percentile0.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

PostTrainBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

PostTrainBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

PostTrainBench

The Top AI Models for PostTrainBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is PostTrainBench?

What PostTrainBench measures and how its scores work.

PostTrainBench is a benchmark for autonomous post-training of pretrain-only base models.

It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, across downstream benchmarks including AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
PostTrainBench
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about PostTrainBench.

Which model scores highest on PostTrainBench?

GLM-5.3 is currently ranked first with 39.80%.

What are the top three models on PostTrainBench?

The current leaders are GLM-5.3 (39.80%), MiniMax M3 (37.10%), and Kimi K3 (36.60%).

Which PostTrainBench model has the lowest official input price?

MiniMax M3 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among PostTrainBench results?

The fastest matched records are GLM-5.3 (472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI), MiniMax M3 (6.61 tok/s via MiniMax), and GLM-5.2 (3.96 tok/s via ZAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does PostTrainBench measure?

It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, across downstream benchmarks including AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

7 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GLM-5.339.80%
Rank #2MiniMax M337.10%
Rank #3Kimi K336.60%
Rank #4Hy4 preview35.60%

Ranking basisThis posttrainbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ZA
    GLM-5.3Zhipu AI
    Score
    39.80%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 7 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MI
    MiniMax M3MiniMax
    Score
    37.10%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 6.61 tok/s via MiniMax

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 7 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    36.60%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 7 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    TE
    Tencent
    Score
    35.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 7 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    ZA
    Zhipu AI
    Score
    34.30%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 3.96 tok/s via ZAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 7 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for PostTrainBench

GLM-5.3 currently leads PostTrainBench with 39.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Kimi K3
Hy4 preview
GLM-5.2
Benchmark rank #1GLM-5.339.80% · $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2MiniMax M337.10% · $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Kimi K336.60% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens