llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

OfficeQA Pro Leaderboard

OfficeQA Pro evaluates AI models on professional knowledge-work questions and tasks drawn from real office workflows.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models12
Model coverage12
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

OfficeQA Pro Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

12 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore72.20%Percentile100.00%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore71.10%Percentile90.91%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicScore67.70%Percentile81.82%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore66.20%Percentile72.73%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank05ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore66.20%Percentile63.64%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank06ModelANClaude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicScore65.60%Percentile54.55%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank07ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore63.30%Percentile45.45%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank08ModelZAGLM-5.3-FlashZhipu AIScore62.40%Percentile36.36%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank09ModelANClaude Haiku 5.5AnthropicScore60.30%Percentile27.27%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank10ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicScore59.40%Percentile18.18%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIScore54.10%Percentile9.09%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank12ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore45.10%Percentile0.00%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

OfficeQA Pro Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

OfficeQA Pro Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

OfficeQA Pro

The Top AI Models for OfficeQA Pro

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is OfficeQA Pro?

What OfficeQA Pro measures and how its scores work.

OfficeQA Pro is a reasoning benchmark based on professional knowledge-work questions and tasks across business domains.

It measures performance on document analysis, spreadsheet reasoning, and information synthesis, reported as a Score ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
OfficeQA Pro
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about OfficeQA Pro.

Which model scores highest on OfficeQA Pro?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 72.20%.

What are the top three models on OfficeQA Pro?

The current leaders are Seed 2.1 Pro (72.20%), Seed 2.1 Turbo (71.10%), and Claude Opus 5.5 (67.70%).

Which OfficeQA Pro model has the lowest official input price?

Claude Haiku 5.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among OfficeQA Pro results?

The fastest matched records are MiniMax M3 (45.04 tok/s via MiniMax), GLM-5.3-Flash (44.69 tok/s via FriendliAI), and Claude Opus 4.8 (42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does OfficeQA Pro measure?

It measures performance on document analysis, spreadsheet reasoning, and information synthesis, reported as a Score ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

12 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro72.20%
Rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo71.10%
Rank #3Claude Opus 5.567.70%
Rank #4Claude Opus 4.866.20%

Ranking basisThis officeqa pro AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    72.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 12 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OfficeQA Pro, not total model capability
  2. 02
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    71.10%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 12 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OfficeQA Pro, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    67.70%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 12.33 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 12 compared models
    • 82th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OfficeQA Pro, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    66.20%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 12 compared models
    • 73th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OfficeQA Pro, not total model capability
  5. 05
    TE
    Tencent
    Score
    66.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 12 compared models
    • 64th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OfficeQA Pro, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for OfficeQA Pro

Seed 2.1 Pro currently leads OfficeQA Pro with 72.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 4.8
Hy4 preview
Benchmark rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro72.20%
Benchmark rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo71.10%
Benchmark rank #3Claude Opus 5.567.70% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens