llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

image to text benchmark

OCRBench_V2 Leaderboard

OCRBench_V2 is a bilingual benchmark for evaluating Large Multimodal Models on visual text localization and reasoning.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models7
Model coverage7
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

OCRBench_V2 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

7 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore67.10%Percentile100.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelAMNova 2 ProAmazonScore64.50%Percentile83.33%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore63.20%Percentile66.67%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore62.80%Percentile50.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelAMNova 2 OmniAmazonScore58.20%Percentile33.33%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen2.5-Omni-7BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore57.80%Percentile16.67%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelAMNova 2 LiteAmazonScore56.10%Percentile0.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

OCRBench_V2 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

OCRBench_V2 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

OCRBench_V2

The Top AI Models for OCRBench_V2

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is OCRBench_V2?

What OCRBench_V2 measures and how its scores work.

OCRBench_V2 contains 10,000 human-verified question-answering pairs across 8 core OCR capabilities.

It measures visual text localization and reasoning, reported as a Score ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
OCRBench_V2
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
image to text
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about OCRBench_V2.

Which model scores highest on OCRBench_V2?

Qwen3.7-Plus is currently ranked first with 67.10%.

What are the top three models on OCRBench_V2?

The current leaders are Qwen3.7-Plus (67.10%), Nova 2 Pro (64.50%), and Seed 2.1 Pro (63.20%).

Which OCRBench_V2 model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among OCRBench_V2 results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does OCRBench_V2 measure?

It measures visual text localization and reasoning, reported as a Score ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

7 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen3.7-Plus67.10%
Rank #2Nova 2 Pro64.50%
Rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro63.20%
Rank #4Seed 2.1 Turbo62.80%

Ranking basisThis ocrbench_v2 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    67.10%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 7 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OCRBench_V2, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AM
    Nova 2 ProAmazon
    Score
    64.50%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 7 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OCRBench_V2, not total model capability
  3. 03
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    63.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 7 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OCRBench_V2, not total model capability
  4. 04
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    62.80%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 7 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OCRBench_V2, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AM
    Amazon
    Score
    58.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 7 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OCRBench_V2, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for OCRBench_V2

Qwen3.7-Plus currently leads OCRBench_V2 with 67.10%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Seed 2.1 Pro
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Nova 2 Omni
Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.7-Plus67.10% · $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Nova 2 Pro64.50%
Benchmark rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro63.20%