math benchmark
MATH-500 is a benchmark subset of 500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelME | Score99.20% | Percentile100.00% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelSA | Score98.60% | Percentile96.77% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelZA | Score98.20% | Percentile93.55% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelZA | Score98.10% | Percentile90.32% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelNV | Score97.80% | Percentile87.10% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelMA | Score97.40% | Percentile83.87% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelMA | Score97.40% | Percentile80.65% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelNV | Score97.00% | Percentile77.42% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelSA | Score97.00% | Percentile74.19% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelME | Score96.80% | Percentile70.97% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelMI | Score96.80% | Percentile67.74% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelNV | Score96.60% | Percentile64.52% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelME | Score96.40% | Percentile61.29% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelAN | Score96.20% | Percentile58.06% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelMA | Score96.20% | Percentile54.84% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelMI | Score96.00% | Percentile51.61% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank17 | ModelDE | Score95.90% | Percentile48.39% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank18 | ModelNV | Score95.40% | Percentile45.16% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank19 | ModelMI | Score94.60% | Percentile41.94% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank20 | ModelDE | Score94.50% | Percentile38.71% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank21 | ModelDE | Score94.30% | Percentile35.48% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank22 | ModelDE | Score94.00% | Percentile32.26% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank23 | ModelDE | Score93.90% | Percentile29.03% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank24 | ModelDE | Score92.80% | Percentile25.81% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank25 | ModelAC | Score90.60% | Percentile22.58% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank26 | ModelAC | Score90.60% | Percentile19.35% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank27 | ModelDE | Score90.20% | Percentile16.13% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank28 | ModelOP | Score90.00% | Percentile12.90% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank29 | ModelDE | Score89.10% | Percentile9.68% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank30 | ModelDE | Score83.90% | Percentile6.45% | Participants32 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What MATH-500 measures and how its scores work.
MATH-500 is a subset of the MATH dataset containing 500 problems with full step-by-step solutions across seven mathematical subjects and multiple difficulty levels.
MATH-500 reports a Score metric in ratio units.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of C.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MATH-500.
LongCat-Flash-Thinking is currently ranked first with 99.20%.
The current leaders are LongCat-Flash-Thinking (99.20%), Sarvam-105B (98.60%), and GLM-4.5 (98.20%).
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning has the lowest matched official input price at $0.08 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are o1-mini (115.00 tok/s via OpenAI), DeepSeek-V3 0324 (100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek), and DeepSeek-V3 (100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
MATH-500 reports a Score metric in ratio units.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
32 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis math-500 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
LongCat-Flash-Thinking currently leads MATH-500 with 99.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.