llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

long context benchmark

LongVideoBench Leaderboard

LongVideoBench is a question-answering benchmark with video-language interleaved inputs up to an hour long.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models6
Model coverage6
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LongVideoBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

6 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore80.60%Percentile100.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore80.60%Percentile80.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore79.80%Percentile60.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelBYSeed 1.8ByteDanceScore77.40%Percentile40.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank05ModelBYSeed 2.0 MiniByteDanceScore74.80%Percentile20.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen2.5 VL 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore54.70%Percentile0.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

LongVideoBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LongVideoBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LongVideoBench

The Top AI Models for LongVideoBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LongVideoBench?

What LongVideoBench measures and how its scores work.

It consists of 3,763 web-collected videos with subtitles and 6,678 human-annotated multiple-choice questions across 17 fine-grained categories.

It measures long-term multimodal understanding using Score, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
LongVideoBench
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
long context
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LongVideoBench.

Which model scores highest on LongVideoBench?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 80.60%.

What are the top three models on LongVideoBench?

The current leaders are Seed 2.1 Pro (80.60%), Seed 2.1 Turbo (80.60%), and Kimi K2.5 (79.80%).

Which LongVideoBench model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LongVideoBench results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LongVideoBench measure?

It measures long-term multimodal understanding using Score, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

6 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro80.60%
Rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo80.60%
Rank #3Kimi K2.579.80%
Rank #4Seed 1.877.40%

Ranking basisThis longvideobench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    80.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 6 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LongVideoBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    80.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 6 compared models
    • 80th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LongVideoBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    79.80%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 6 compared models
    • 60th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LongVideoBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    77.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 6 compared models
    • 40th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LongVideoBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    74.80%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 6 compared models
    • 20th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LongVideoBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LongVideoBench

Seed 2.1 Pro currently leads LongVideoBench with 80.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Kimi K2.5
Seed 1.8
Seed 2.0 Mini
Benchmark rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro80.60%
Benchmark rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo80.60%
Benchmark rank #3Kimi K2.579.80%