llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1425 models809 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

healthcare benchmark

LifeSci Diamond (2026-11) Leaderboard

LifeSci Diamond (2026-11) is a benchmark of regulatory-affairs tasks covering FDA/EMA submissions, labeling, and compliance.

Updated Nov 11, 2026

Models18
Model coverage18
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LifeSci Diamond (2026-11) Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

18 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-6 AstraOpenAIScore20.00%Percentile100.00%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-6.1 SolOpenAIScore14.50%Percentile94.12%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-6.1 TerraOpenAIScore9.10%Percentile88.24%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank04ModelMEMuse WonderMetaScore9.10%Percentile82.35%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank05ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore5.50%Percentile76.47%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank06ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicScore3.60%Percentile70.59%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank07ModelANClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicScore3.60%Percentile64.71%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank08ModelXAGrok 4.6xAIScore3.60%Percentile58.82%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank09ModelANClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicScore1.80%Percentile52.94%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank10ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicScore1.80%Percentile47.06%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank11ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicScore1.80%Percentile41.18%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank12ModelGOGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleScore1.80%Percentile35.29%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore1.80%Percentile29.41%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank14ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore1.80%Percentile23.53%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank15ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore0.00%Percentile17.65%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank16ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleScore0.00%Percentile11.76%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank17ModelGOGemini 4 ArgonGoogleScore0.00%Percentile5.88%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank18ModelMEMuse Spark 1.2MetaScore0.00%Percentile0.00%Participants18EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026

LifeSci Diamond (2026-11) Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LifeSci Diamond (2026-11) Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LifeSci Diamond (2026-11)

The Top AI Models for LifeSci Diamond (2026-11)

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LifeSci Diamond (2026-11)?

What LifeSci Diamond (2026-11) measures and how its scores work.

It consists of 55 regulatory-affairs tasks, 18 of them written by outside specialists.

Score is the strict pass rate: a task counts only when every requirement is met and no fail line fires, as judged by a jury of LLM graders.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
LifeSci Diamond (2026-11)
Modality
text
Primary category
healthcare
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LifeSci Diamond (2026-11).

Which model scores highest on LifeSci Diamond (2026-11)?

GPT-6 Astra is currently ranked first with 20.00%.

What are the top three models on LifeSci Diamond (2026-11)?

The current leaders are GPT-6 Astra (20.00%), GPT-6.1 Sol (14.50%), and GPT-6.1 Terra (9.10%).

Which LifeSci Diamond (2026-11) model has the lowest official input price?

Gemini 3.7 Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LifeSci Diamond (2026-11) results?

The fastest matched records are Gemini 3.1 Pro (90.00 tok/s via Google), GPT-6.1 Terra (53.24 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-6 Astra (46.29 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LifeSci Diamond (2026-11) measure?

Score is the strict pass rate: a task counts only when every requirement is met and no fail line fires, as judged by a jury of LLM graders.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

18 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-6 Astra20.00%
Rank #2GPT-6.1 Sol14.50%
Rank #3GPT-6.1 Terra9.10%
Rank #4Muse Wonder9.10%

Ranking basisThis lifesci diamond (2026-11) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    Score
    20.00%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 46.29 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 18 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LifeSci Diamond (2026-11), not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Score
    14.50%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 18 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LifeSci Diamond (2026-11), not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    9.10%
    Price
    $1.0 input / $5.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 53.24 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 18 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LifeSci Diamond (2026-11), not total model capability
  4. 04
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    9.10%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 18 compared models
    • 82th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LifeSci Diamond (2026-11), not total model capability
  5. 05
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    5.50%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 18 compared models
    • 76th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LifeSci Diamond (2026-11), not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LifeSci Diamond (2026-11)

GPT-6 Astra currently leads LifeSci Diamond (2026-11) with 20.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-6.1 Terra
Muse Wonder
GPT-5.6 Sol
Benchmark rank #1GPT-6 Astra20.00% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2GPT-6.1 Sol14.50% · $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-6.1 Terra9.10% · $1.0 input / $5.0 output per 1M tokens