llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

knowledge benchmark

Harvey LAB-AA Leaderboard

Harvey LAB-AA is a knowledge benchmark that evaluates model performance on complex legal workflows.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models5
Model coverage5
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Harvey LAB-AA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

5 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelGOGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleScore90.70%Percentile100.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelMEMuse Wonder FullMetaScore13.10%Percentile75.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelMEMuse Wonder FullMetaScore13.10%Percentile50.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelMEMuse WonderMetaScore10.00%Percentile25.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank05ModelMEMuse WonderMetaScore10.00%Percentile0.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

Harvey LAB-AA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Harvey LAB-AA Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Harvey LAB-AA

The Top AI Models for Harvey LAB-AA

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Harvey LAB-AA?

What Harvey LAB-AA measures and how its scores work.

Harvey LAB-AA is a benchmark for evaluating model performance on complex legal workflows.

It measures model performance on complex legal workflows using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Harvey LAB-AA
Modality
text
Primary category
knowledge
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Harvey LAB-AA.

Which model scores highest on Harvey LAB-AA?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is currently ranked first with 90.70%.

What are the top three models on Harvey LAB-AA?

The current leaders are Gemini 3.7 Flash (90.70%), Muse Wonder Full (13.10%), and Muse Wonder Full (13.10%).

Which Harvey LAB-AA model has the lowest official input price?

Gemini 3.7 Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Harvey LAB-AA results?

The fastest matched records are Gemini 3.7 Flash (409.96 tok/s via Google).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Harvey LAB-AA measure?

It measures model performance on complex legal workflows using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

5 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Gemini 3.7 Flash90.70%
Rank #2Muse Wonder Full13.10%
Rank #3Muse Wonder Full13.10%
Rank #4Muse Wonder10.00%

Ranking basisThis harvey lab-aa AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    GO
    Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
    Score
    90.70%
    Price
    $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 409.96 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 5 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Harvey LAB-AA, not total model capability
  2. 02
    ME
    Muse Wonder FullMeta
    Score
    13.10%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 5 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Harvey LAB-AA, not total model capability
  3. 03
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    13.10%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 5 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Harvey LAB-AA, not total model capability
  4. 04
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    10.00%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 5 compared models
    • 25th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Harvey LAB-AA, not total model capability
  5. 05
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    10.00%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 5 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Harvey LAB-AA, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Harvey LAB-AA

Gemini 3.7 Flash currently leads Harvey LAB-AA with 90.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Muse Wonder Full
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder
Benchmark rank #1Gemini 3.7 Flash90.70% · $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Muse Wonder Full13.10%
Benchmark rank #3Muse Wonder Full13.10%