llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

long context benchmark

Graphwalks parents >128k Leaderboard

Graphwalks parents >128k is a graph reasoning benchmark for evaluating language models on finding parent nodes in graphs with context lengths over 128k tokens.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models7
Model coverage7
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Graphwalks parents >128k Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

7 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore95.40%Percentile100.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore83.30%Percentile83.33%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIScore58.50%Percentile66.67%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIScore32.40%Percentile50.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelOPGPT-4.1OpenAIScore25.00%Percentile33.33%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-4.1 miniOpenAIScore11.00%Percentile16.67%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelOPGPT-4.1 nanoOpenAIScore5.60%Percentile0.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Graphwalks parents >128k Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Graphwalks parents >128k Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Graphwalks parents >128k

The Top AI Models for Graphwalks parents >128k

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Graphwalks parents >128k?

What Graphwalks parents >128k measures and how its scores work.

A graph reasoning benchmark focused on finding parent nodes in graphs with context lengths over 128k tokens.

It measures language models' ability to find parent nodes in graphs, along with long-context reasoning and graph structure understanding, using the Score metric as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Graphwalks parents >128k
Modality
text
Primary category
long context
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Graphwalks parents >128k.

Which model scores highest on Graphwalks parents >128k?

Claude Opus 4.6 is currently ranked first with 95.40%.

What are the top three models on Graphwalks parents >128k?

The current leaders are Claude Opus 4.6 (95.40%), Claude Opus 4.8 (83.30%), and GPT-5.5 (58.50%).

Which Graphwalks parents >128k model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-4.1 nano has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Graphwalks parents >128k results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-4.1 mini (467.39 tok/s via OpenAI), GPT-4.1 nano (138.14 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-5.5 (134.94 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Graphwalks parents >128k measure?

It measures language models' ability to find parent nodes in graphs, along with long-context reasoning and graph structure understanding, using the Score metric as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

7 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Opus 4.695.40%
Rank #2Claude Opus 4.883.30%
Rank #3GPT-5.558.50%
Rank #4GPT-5.432.40%

Ranking basisThis graphwalks parents >128k AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
    Score
    95.40%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 123.15 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 7 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Graphwalks parents >128k, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
    Score
    83.30%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 7 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Graphwalks parents >128k, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    58.50%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 134.94 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 7 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Graphwalks parents >128k, not total model capability
  4. 04
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    32.40%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 50.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 7 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Graphwalks parents >128k, not total model capability
  5. 05
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    25.00%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $8.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 7 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Graphwalks parents >128k, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Graphwalks parents >128k

Claude Opus 4.6 currently leads Graphwalks parents >128k with 95.40%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.5
GPT-5.4
GPT-4.1
Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 4.695.40% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Opus 4.883.30% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.558.50% · $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens