multimodal benchmark
GDP.pdf is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates models on professional tasks presented as visual documents (PDFs).
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Score81.60% | Percentile100.00% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelGO | Score35.00% | Percentile83.33% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelGO | Score34.00% | Percentile66.67% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelOP | Score30.70% | Percentile50.00% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAN | Score29.80% | Percentile33.33% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelOP | Score24.70% | Percentile16.67% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelOP | Score22.70% | Percentile0.00% | Participants7 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What GDP.pdf measures and how its scores work.
GDP.pdf is a knowledge-work vision benchmark focused on document-based reasoning and problem solving with visual documents.
It measures document-based reasoning, chart and table interpretation, and problem solving without tools using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about GDP.pdf.
Claude Sonnet 5 is currently ranked first with 81.60%.
The current leaders are Claude Sonnet 5 (81.60%), Gemini 3.8 Flash (35.00%), and Gemini 3.7 Flash (34.00%).
GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Gemini 3.7 Flash (117.86 tok/s via Google), GPT-5.6 Terra (99.35 tok/s via OpenAI), and Gemini 3.8 Flash (51.56 tok/s via Google).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures document-based reasoning, chart and table interpretation, and problem solving without tools using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
7 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis gdp.pdf AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Sonnet 5 currently leads GDP.pdf with 81.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.