llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

GDP.pdf Leaderboard

GDP.pdf is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates models on professional tasks presented as visual documents (PDFs).

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models14
Model coverage14
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

GDP.pdf Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

14 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicScore81.60%Percentile100.00%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelGOGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleScore35.00%Percentile92.31%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelGOGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleScore34.00%Percentile84.62%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelMEMuse Wonder FullMetaScore33.20%Percentile76.92%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank05ModelMEMuse Wonder FullMetaScore33.20%Percentile69.23%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-6.1 SolOpenAIScore32.00%Percentile61.54%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank07ModelMEMuse WonderMetaScore30.80%Percentile53.85%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank08ModelMEMuse WonderMetaScore30.80%Percentile46.15%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank09ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore30.70%Percentile38.46%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank10ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicScore29.80%Percentile30.77%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore24.70%Percentile23.08%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank12ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore22.70%Percentile15.38%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank13ModelMIMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMaxScore20.80%Percentile7.69%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank14ModelMAMistral Large 4Mistral AIScore18.60%Percentile0.00%Participants14EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

GDP.pdf Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

GDP.pdf Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

GDP.pdf

The Top AI Models for GDP.pdf

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is GDP.pdf?

What GDP.pdf measures and how its scores work.

GDP.pdf is a knowledge-work vision benchmark focused on document-based reasoning and problem solving with visual documents.

It measures document-based reasoning, chart and table interpretation, and problem solving without tools using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
GDP.pdf
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about GDP.pdf.

Which model scores highest on GDP.pdf?

Claude Sonnet 5 is currently ranked first with 81.60%.

What are the top three models on GDP.pdf?

The current leaders are Claude Sonnet 5 (81.60%), Gemini 3.8 Flash (35.00%), and Gemini 3.7 Flash (34.00%).

Which GDP.pdf model has the lowest official input price?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among GDP.pdf results?

The fastest matched records are Gemini 3.7 Flash (409.96 tok/s via Google), GPT-5.6 Luna (215.52 tok/s via OpenAI), and Gemini 3.8 Flash (55.66 tok/s via Google).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does GDP.pdf measure?

It measures document-based reasoning, chart and table interpretation, and problem solving without tools using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

14 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Sonnet 581.60%
Rank #2Gemini 3.8 Flash35.00%
Rank #3Gemini 3.7 Flash34.00%
Rank #4Muse Wonder Full33.20%

Ranking basisThis gdp.pdf AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
    Score
    81.60%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 14 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures GDP.pdf, not total model capability
  2. 02
    GO
    Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
    Score
    35.00%
    Price
    $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 55.66 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 14 compared models
    • 92th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures GDP.pdf, not total model capability
  3. 03
    GO
    Google
    Score
    34.00%
    Price
    $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 409.96 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 14 compared models
    • 85th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures GDP.pdf, not total model capability
  4. 04
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    33.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 14 compared models
    • 77th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures GDP.pdf, not total model capability
  5. 05
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    33.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 14 compared models
    • 69th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures GDP.pdf, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for GDP.pdf

Claude Sonnet 5 currently leads GDP.pdf with 81.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Muse Wonder Full
Muse Wonder Full
Benchmark rank #1Claude Sonnet 581.60% · $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Gemini 3.8 Flash35.00% · $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Gemini 3.7 Flash34.00% · $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens