llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

FrontierScience Research Leaderboard

FrontierScience Research is a reasoning benchmark that evaluates AI models on scientific research questions requiring domain expertise, multi-step reasoning, and synthesis of complex scientific concepts across disciplines.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

FrontierScience Research Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

4 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMEMuse SparkMetaScore38.30%Percentile100.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore33.30%Percentile66.67%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore28.30%Percentile33.33%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelTEHy3TencentScore21.30%Percentile0.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

FrontierScience Research Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

FrontierScience Research Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

FrontierScience Research

The Top AI Models for FrontierScience Research

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is FrontierScience Research?

What FrontierScience Research measures and how its scores work.

FrontierScience Research is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on cutting-edge scientific research questions.

It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, on questions requiring deep domain expertise, multi-step reasoning, and synthesis of complex scientific concepts across disciplines.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
FrontierScience Research
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about FrontierScience Research.

Which model scores highest on FrontierScience Research?

Muse Spark is currently ranked first with 38.30%.

What are the top three models on FrontierScience Research?

The current leaders are Muse Spark (38.30%), Seed 2.1 Turbo (33.30%), and Seed 2.1 Pro (28.30%).

Which FrontierScience Research model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among FrontierScience Research results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does FrontierScience Research measure?

It measures performance using the Score metric, reported as a ratio, on questions requiring deep domain expertise, multi-step reasoning, and synthesis of complex scientific concepts across disciplines.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

4 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Muse Spark38.30%
Rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo33.30%
Rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro28.30%
Rank #4Hy321.30%

Ranking basisThis frontierscience research AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Muse SparkMeta
    Score
    38.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 4 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FrontierScience Research, not total model capability
  2. 02
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    33.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 4 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FrontierScience Research, not total model capability
  3. 03
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    28.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 4 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FrontierScience Research, not total model capability
  4. 04
    TE
    Tencent
    Score
    21.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 4 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FrontierScience Research, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for FrontierScience Research

Muse Spark currently leads FrontierScience Research with 38.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Seed 2.1 Pro
Hy3
Benchmark rank #1Muse Spark38.30%
Benchmark rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo33.30%
Benchmark rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro28.30%