llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

math benchmark

EMMA Leaderboard

EMMA (Enhanced MultiModal reAsoning) is a benchmark for organic multimodal reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models2
Model coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

EMMA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore79.30%Percentile100.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore78.40%Percentile0.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

EMMA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro79.30%Rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo78.40%

EMMA Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

EMMA

The Top AI Models for EMMA

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is EMMA?

What EMMA measures and how its scores work.

EMMA (Enhanced MultiModal reAsoning) is a benchmark for organic multimodal reasoning.

It measures reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding, reported as Score in ratio units.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
EMMA
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
math
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about EMMA.

Which model scores highest on EMMA?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 79.30%.

What are the top three models on EMMA?

The current leaders are Seed 2.1 Pro (79.30%) and Seed 2.1 Turbo (78.40%).

Which EMMA model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among EMMA results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does EMMA measure?

It measures reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding, reported as Score in ratio units.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Ranking basisThis emma AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    79.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 2 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures EMMA, not total model capability
  2. 02
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    78.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 2 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures EMMA, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for EMMA

Seed 2.1 Pro currently leads EMMA with 79.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro79.30%
Benchmark rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo78.40%