llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

agents benchmark

DeepSWE Leaderboard

DeepSWE is a software engineering agent benchmark evaluated with the mini-swe-agent harness on tasks solved in isolated containers without internet access.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models13
Model coverage13
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

DeepSWE Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

13 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore72.70%Percentile100.00%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore69.60%Percentile91.67%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore67.50%Percentile83.33%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore67.20%Percentile75.00%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore64.30%Percentile66.67%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeekScore62.70%Percentile58.33%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeekScore59.30%Percentile50.00%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731DeepSeekScore54.40%Percentile41.67%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelXAGrok 4.5xAIScore53.00%Percentile33.33%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIScore46.20%Percentile25.00%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore32.70%Percentile16.67%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelTEHy3TencentScore28.00%Percentile8.33%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore23.00%Percentile0.00%Participants13EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

DeepSWE Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

DeepSWE Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

DeepSWE

The Top AI Models for DeepSWE

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is DeepSWE?

What DeepSWE measures and how its scores work.

DeepSWE is a benchmark for software engineering agents.

It measures an agent's ability to autonomously resolve real-world coding issues end to end, reported as a Score ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
DeepSWE
Modality
text
Primary category
agents
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSWE.

Which model scores highest on DeepSWE?

GPT-5.6 Sol is currently ranked first with 72.70%.

What are the top three models on DeepSWE?

The current leaders are GPT-5.6 Sol (72.70%), GPT-5.6 Terra (69.60%), and Kimi K3 (67.50%).

Which DeepSWE model has the lowest official input price?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp has the lowest matched official input price at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among DeepSWE results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5.6 Terra (99.35 tok/s via OpenAI), Grok 4.5 (80.00 tok/s via xAI), and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (45.48 tok/s via DeepSeek).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does DeepSWE measure?

It measures an agent's ability to autonomously resolve real-world coding issues end to end, reported as a Score ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

13 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-5.6 Sol72.70%
Rank #2GPT-5.6 Terra69.60%
Rank #3Kimi K367.50%
Rank #4GPT-5.6 Luna67.20%

Ranking basisThis deepswe AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
    Score
    72.70%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 2.36 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 13 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DeepSWE, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
    Score
    69.60%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 99.35 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 13 compared models
    • 92th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DeepSWE, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    67.50%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 13 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DeepSWE, not total model capability
  4. 04
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    67.20%
    Price
    $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 41.87 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 13 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DeepSWE, not total model capability
  5. 05
    TE
    Tencent
    Score
    64.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 13 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DeepSWE, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for DeepSWE

GPT-5.6 Sol currently leads DeepSWE with 72.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Kimi K3
GPT-5.6 Luna
Hy4 preview
Benchmark rank #1GPT-5.6 Sol72.70% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2GPT-5.6 Terra69.60% · $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Kimi K367.50% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens