llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

ClawEval-MM Leaderboard

ClawEval-MM is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates agentic problem solving with visual inputs.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models6
Model coverage6
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

ClawEval-MM Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

6 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore60.40%Percentile100.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.8 FlashAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore60.40%Percentile80.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.8-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore56.90%Percentile60.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore55.70%Percentile40.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore51.00%Percentile20.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore46.00%Percentile0.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

ClawEval-MM Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

ClawEval-MM Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

ClawEval-MM

The Top AI Models for ClawEval-MM

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is ClawEval-MM?

What ClawEval-MM measures and how its scores work.

ClawEval-MM is the multimodal variant of ClawEval.

It measures agentic problem solving with visual inputs using Score, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
ClawEval-MM
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about ClawEval-MM.

Which model scores highest on ClawEval-MM?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is currently ranked first with 60.40%.

What are the top three models on ClawEval-MM?

The current leaders are Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (60.40%), Qwen3.8 Flash (60.40%), and Qwen3.8-27B (56.90%).

Which ClawEval-MM model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen3.8 Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.15 input / $0.47 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among ClawEval-MM results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does ClawEval-MM measure?

It measures agentic problem solving with visual inputs using Score, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

6 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen3.8-Flash-Next60.40%
Rank #2Qwen3.8 Flash60.40%
Rank #3Qwen3.8-27B56.90%
Rank #4Qwen3.7-Plus55.70%

Ranking basisThis claweval-mm AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    60.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 6 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ClawEval-MM, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.8 FlashAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    60.40%
    Price
    $0.15 input / $0.47 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 6 compared models
    • 80th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ClawEval-MM, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    56.90%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 6 compared models
    • 60th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ClawEval-MM, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    55.70%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 6 compared models
    • 40th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ClawEval-MM, not total model capability
  5. 05
    BY
    ByteDance
    Score
    51.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 6 compared models
    • 20th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ClawEval-MM, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for ClawEval-MM

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next currently leads ClawEval-MM with 60.40%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen3.7-Plus
Seed 2.1 Pro
Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.8-Flash-Next60.40%
Benchmark rank #2Qwen3.8 Flash60.40% · $0.15 input / $0.47 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.8-27B56.90%