llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

BLINK Leaderboard

BLINK is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates core visual perception abilities using 3,807 multiple-choice questions adapted from 14 classic computer vision tasks.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models15
Model coverage15
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

BLINK Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

15 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore81.40%Percentile100.00%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore79.40%Percentile92.86%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.70%Percentile85.71%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3 VL 8B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore69.10%Percentile78.57%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore68.70%Percentile71.43%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3 VL 32B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore68.50%Percentile64.29%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore67.70%Percentile57.14%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore67.30%Percentile50.00%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore67.10%Percentile42.86%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelACQwen3 VL 4B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore65.80%Percentile35.71%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore65.40%Percentile28.57%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelACQwen3 VL 4B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore63.40%Percentile21.43%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelLALFM2.5-VL-3BLiquid AIScore61.50%Percentile14.29%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelMIPhi-4-multimodal-instructMicrosoftScore61.30%Percentile7.14%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelCONorth Micro Vision InstructCohereScore52.70%Percentile0.00%Participants15EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

BLINK Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

BLINK Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

BLINK

The Top AI Models for BLINK

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is BLINK?

What BLINK measures and how its scores work.

BLINK is a benchmark for multimodal language models, with questions paired with single or multiple images and visual prompting.

It measures performance on relative depth estimation, visual correspondence, forensics detection, multi-view reasoning, counting, object localization, and spatial reasoning.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
BLINK
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about BLINK.

Which model scores highest on BLINK?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 81.40%.

What are the top three models on BLINK?

The current leaders are Seed 2.1 Pro (81.40%), Seed 2.1 Turbo (79.40%), and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (70.70%).

Which BLINK model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among BLINK results?

The fastest matched records are Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (25.00 tok/s via DeepInfra) and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking (8.77 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does BLINK measure?

It measures performance on relative depth estimation, visual correspondence, forensics detection, multi-view reasoning, counting, object localization, and spatial reasoning.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

15 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro81.40%
Rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo79.40%
Rank #3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct70.70%
Rank #4Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct69.10%

Ranking basisThis blink AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    81.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 15 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BLINK, not total model capability
  2. 02
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    79.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 15 compared models
    • 93th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BLINK, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    70.70%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 15 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BLINK, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    69.10%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 15 compared models
    • 79th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BLINK, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    68.70%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 15 compared models
    • 71th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BLINK, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for BLINK

Seed 2.1 Pro currently leads BLINK with 81.40%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Benchmark rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro81.40%
Benchmark rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo79.40%
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct70.70%