llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

BioMysteryBench Leaderboard

BioMysteryBench evaluates a model's ability to reason through challenging molecular biology problems.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models5
Model coverage5
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

BioMysteryBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

5 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicScore90.10%Percentile100.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore71.30%Percentile75.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelGOGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleScore56.50%Percentile50.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicScore46.10%Percentile25.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelGOGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleScore43.50%Percentile0.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

BioMysteryBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

BioMysteryBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

BioMysteryBench

The Top AI Models for BioMysteryBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is BioMysteryBench?

What BioMysteryBench measures and how its scores work.

BioMysteryBench is a reasoning benchmark for challenging molecular biology problems.

It measures performance on a hard subset and on the subset of problems solved by human experts, reported as a Score ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
BioMysteryBench
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about BioMysteryBench.

Which model scores highest on BioMysteryBench?

Claude Opus 5 is currently ranked first with 90.10%.

What are the top three models on BioMysteryBench?

The current leaders are Claude Opus 5 (90.10%), Hy4 preview (71.30%), and Gemini 3.8 Flash (56.50%).

Which BioMysteryBench model has the lowest official input price?

Gemini 3.8 Flash has the lowest matched official input price at $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among BioMysteryBench results?

The fastest matched records are Gemini 3.7 Flash (117.86 tok/s via Google), Claude Opus 5 (62.88 tok/s via Anthropic), and Gemini 3.8 Flash (51.56 tok/s via Google).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does BioMysteryBench measure?

It measures performance on a hard subset and on the subset of problems solved by human experts, reported as a Score ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

5 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Opus 590.10%
Rank #2Hy4 preview71.30%
Rank #3Gemini 3.8 Flash56.50%
Rank #4Claude Fable 546.10%

Ranking basisThis biomysterybench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Opus 5Anthropic
    Score
    90.10%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 62.88 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 5 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BioMysteryBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    TE
    Hy4 previewTencent
    Score
    71.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 5 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BioMysteryBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    GO
    Google
    Score
    56.50%
    Price
    $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 51.56 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 5 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BioMysteryBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    46.10%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.18 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 5 compared models
    • 25th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BioMysteryBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    GO
    Google
    Score
    43.50%
    Price
    $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 117.86 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 5 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BioMysteryBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for BioMysteryBench

Claude Opus 5 currently leads BioMysteryBench with 90.10%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Claude Fable 5
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 590.10% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Hy4 preview71.30%
Benchmark rank #3Gemini 3.8 Flash56.50% · $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens