llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

frontend development benchmark

Artifacts Bench Leaderboard

Artifacts Bench evaluates a model's ability to generate visual code artifacts from natural-language requests.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Artifacts Bench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore51.00%Percentile100.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore47.00%Percentile50.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelMIMAI-Code-1-FlashMicrosoftScore36.40%Percentile0.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Artifacts Bench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Artifacts Bench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Artifacts Bench

The Top AI Models for Artifacts Bench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Artifacts Bench?

What Artifacts Bench measures and how its scores work.

Artifacts Bench is a benchmark for evaluating the generation of interactive and visual front-end outputs.

It measures the quality of generated interactive and visual front-end outputs using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Artifacts Bench
Modality
text
Primary category
frontend development
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Artifacts Bench.

Which model scores highest on Artifacts Bench?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 51.00%.

What are the top three models on Artifacts Bench?

The current leaders are Seed 2.1 Pro (51.00%), Seed 2.1 Turbo (47.00%), and MAI-Code-1-Flash (36.40%).

Which Artifacts Bench model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among Artifacts Bench results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Artifacts Bench measure?

It measures the quality of generated interactive and visual front-end outputs using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro51.00%
Rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo47.00%
Rank #3MAI-Code-1-Flash36.40%

Ranking basisThis artifacts bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    51.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 3 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Artifacts Bench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    47.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 3 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Artifacts Bench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MI
    Microsoft
    Score
    36.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 3 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Artifacts Bench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Artifacts Bench

Seed 2.1 Pro currently leads Artifacts Bench with 51.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

MAI-Code-1-Flash
Benchmark rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro51.00%
Benchmark rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo47.00%
Benchmark rank #3MAI-Code-1-Flash36.40%