language benchmark
WMT23 is a machine translation benchmark covering 8 language pairs and 14 translation directions across general, biomedical, literary, and low-resource translation tasks.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelGO | Score75.10% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelGO | Score74.10% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelGO | Score72.60% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelGO | Score71.70% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What WMT23 measures and how its scores work.
WMT23 is the benchmark from the Eighth Conference on Machine Translation, featuring shared tasks for quality estimation, metrics evaluation, sign language translation, and discourse-level literary translation.
It evaluates machine translation systems across the listed translation tasks, including assessment through professional human evaluation.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about WMT23.
Gemini 1.5 Pro is currently ranked first with 75.10%.
The current leaders are Gemini 1.5 Pro (75.10%), Gemini 1.5 Flash (74.10%), and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (72.60%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
The fastest matched records are Gemini 1.5 Flash (150.00 tok/s via Google), Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (150.00 tok/s via Google), and Gemini 1.0 Pro (120.00 tok/s via Google).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It evaluates machine translation systems across the listed translation tasks, including assessment through professional human evaluation.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis wmt23 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Gemini 1.5 Pro currently leads WMT23 with 75.10%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.