llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

language benchmark

Winogrande Leaderboard

Winogrande is a large-scale dataset of 44,000 pronoun resolution problems designed to test machine commonsense reasoning.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models22
Model coverage22
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Winogrande Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

22 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-4OpenAIScore87.50%Percentile100.00%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelXIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiScore85.60%Percentile95.24%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelCOCommand R+CohereScore85.40%Percentile90.48%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen2 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore85.10%Percentile85.71%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelNVLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNVIDIAScore84.53%Percentile80.95%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelGOGemma 2 27BGoogleScore83.70%Percentile76.19%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelNRHermes 3 70BNous ResearchScore83.19%Percentile71.43%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen2.5 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.00%Percentile66.67%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelMIPhi-3.5-MoE-instructMicrosoftScore81.30%Percentile61.90%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelACQwen2.5-Coder 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore80.80%Percentile57.14%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank11ModelGOGemma 2 9BGoogleScore80.60%Percentile52.38%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank12ModelMAMistral NeMo InstructMistral AIScore76.80%Percentile47.62%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank13ModelMAMinistral 8B InstructMistral AIScore75.30%Percentile42.86%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank14ModelIBGranite 3.3 8B BaseIBMScore74.40%Percentile38.10%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank15ModelACQwen2.5-Coder 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore72.90%Percentile33.33%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank16ModelGOGemma 3n E4BGoogleScore71.70%Percentile28.57%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank17ModelGOGemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT PreviewGoogleScore71.70%Percentile23.81%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank18ModelMIPhi-3.5-mini-instructMicrosoftScore68.50%Percentile19.05%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank19ModelMIPhi 4 MiniMicrosoftScore67.00%Percentile14.29%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank20ModelGOGemma 3n E2BGoogleScore66.80%Percentile9.52%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank21ModelGOGemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)GoogleScore66.80%Percentile4.76%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank22ModelBAERNIE 4.5BaiduScore51.30%Percentile0.00%Participants22EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Winogrande Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Winogrande Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Winogrande

The Top AI Models for Winogrande

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Winogrande?

What Winogrande measures and how its scores work.

Winogrande is an adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge dataset that uses adversarial filtering to reduce spurious biases.

It measures performance on pronoun resolution problems requiring commonsense reasoning, reported as Score in ratio units.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Winogrande
Modality
text
Primary category
language
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Winogrande.

Which model scores highest on Winogrande?

GPT-4 is currently ranked first with 87.50%.

What are the top three models on Winogrande?

The current leaders are GPT-4 (87.50%), MiMo-V2.5-Pro (85.60%), and Command R+ (85.40%).

Which Winogrande model has the lowest official input price?

Phi 4 Mini has the lowest matched official input price at $0.08 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Winogrande results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-4 (104.00 tok/s via Azure), Command R+ (59.00 tok/s via Cohere), and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct (44.00 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Winogrande measure?

It measures performance on pronoun resolution problems requiring commonsense reasoning, reported as Score in ratio units.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

22 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-487.50%
Rank #2MiMo-V2.5-Pro85.60%
Rank #3Command R+85.40%
Rank #4Qwen2 72B Instruct85.10%

Ranking basisThis winogrande AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-4OpenAI
    Score
    87.50%
    Price
    $30 input / $60 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 104.00 tok/s via Azure

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 22 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Winogrande, not total model capability
  2. 02
    XI
    MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
    Score
    85.60%
    Price
    $0.44 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 5.27 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 22 compared models
    • 95th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Winogrande, not total model capability
  3. 03
    CO
    Cohere
    Score
    85.40%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 59.00 tok/s via Cohere

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 22 compared models
    • 90th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Winogrande, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    85.10%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 22 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Winogrande, not total model capability
  5. 05
    NV
    NVIDIA
    Score
    84.53%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 22 compared models
    • 81th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Winogrande, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Winogrande

GPT-4 currently leads Winogrande with 87.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Command R+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Benchmark rank #1GPT-487.50% · $30 input / $60 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2MiMo-V2.5-Pro85.60% · $0.44 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Command R+85.40% · $2.5 input / $10 output per 1M tokens