llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

language benchmark

Winogrande Leaderboard

Winogrande is a large-scale dataset of 44,000 pronoun resolution problems designed to test machine commonsense reasoning.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models23
Model coverage23
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Winogrande Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

23 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-4OpenAIScore87.50%Percentile100.00%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelNRHermes 3 405BNous ResearchScore86.27%Percentile95.45%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelXIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiScore85.60%Percentile90.91%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelCOCommand R+CohereScore85.40%Percentile86.36%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen2 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore85.10%Percentile81.82%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank06ModelNVLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNVIDIAScore84.53%Percentile77.27%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank07ModelGOGemma 2 27BGoogleScore83.70%Percentile72.73%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank08ModelNRHermes 3 70BNous ResearchScore83.19%Percentile68.18%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen2.5 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.00%Percentile63.64%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank10ModelMIPhi-3.5-MoE-instructMicrosoftScore81.30%Percentile59.09%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen2.5-Coder 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore80.80%Percentile54.55%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank12ModelGOGemma 2 9BGoogleScore80.60%Percentile50.00%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank13ModelMAMistral NeMo InstructMistral AIScore76.80%Percentile45.45%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank14ModelMAMinistral 8B InstructMistral AIScore75.30%Percentile40.91%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank15ModelIBGranite 3.3 8B BaseIBMScore74.40%Percentile36.36%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank16ModelACQwen2.5-Coder 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore72.90%Percentile31.82%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank17ModelGOGemma 3n E4BGoogleScore71.70%Percentile27.27%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank18ModelGOGemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT PreviewGoogleScore71.70%Percentile22.73%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank19ModelMIPhi-3.5-mini-instructMicrosoftScore68.50%Percentile18.18%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank20ModelMIPhi 4 MiniMicrosoftScore67.00%Percentile13.64%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank21ModelGOGemma 3n E2BGoogleScore66.80%Percentile9.09%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank22ModelGOGemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)GoogleScore66.80%Percentile4.55%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank23ModelBAERNIE 4.5BaiduScore51.30%Percentile0.00%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

Winogrande Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Winogrande Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Winogrande

The Top AI Models for Winogrande

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Winogrande?

What Winogrande measures and how its scores work.

Winogrande is an adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge dataset that uses adversarial filtering to reduce spurious biases.

It measures performance on pronoun resolution problems requiring commonsense reasoning, reported as Score in ratio units.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Winogrande
Modality
text
Primary category
language
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Winogrande.

Which model scores highest on Winogrande?

GPT-4 is currently ranked first with 87.50%.

What are the top three models on Winogrande?

The current leaders are GPT-4 (87.50%), Hermes 3 405B (86.27%), and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (85.60%).

Which Winogrande model has the lowest official input price?

Phi 4 Mini has the lowest matched official input price at $0.08 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Winogrande results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-4 (104.00 tok/s via Azure), Command R+ (59.00 tok/s via Cohere), and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct (44.00 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Winogrande measure?

It measures performance on pronoun resolution problems requiring commonsense reasoning, reported as Score in ratio units.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

23 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-487.50%
Rank #2Hermes 3 405B86.27%
Rank #3MiMo-V2.5-Pro85.60%
Rank #4Command R+85.40%

Ranking basisThis winogrande AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-4OpenAI
    Score
    87.50%
    Price
    $30 input / $60 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 104.00 tok/s via Azure

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 23 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Winogrande, not total model capability
  2. 02
    NR
    Hermes 3 405BNous Research
    Score
    86.27%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 23 compared models
    • 95th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Winogrande, not total model capability
  3. 03
    XI
    Xiaomi
    Score
    85.60%
    Price
    $0.44 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 23 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Winogrande, not total model capability
  4. 04
    CO
    Cohere
    Score
    85.40%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 59.00 tok/s via Cohere

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 23 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Winogrande, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    85.10%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 23 compared models
    • 82th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Winogrande, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Winogrande

GPT-4 currently leads Winogrande with 87.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Command R+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Benchmark rank #1GPT-487.50% · $30 input / $60 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Hermes 3 405B86.27%
Benchmark rank #3MiMo-V2.5-Pro85.60% · $0.44 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens