language benchmark
Winogrande is a large-scale dataset of 44,000 pronoun resolution problems designed to test machine commonsense reasoning.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelOP | Score87.50% | Percentile100.00% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelXI | Score85.60% | Percentile95.24% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelCO | Score85.40% | Percentile90.48% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score85.10% | Percentile85.71% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelNV | Score84.53% | Percentile80.95% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelGO | Score83.70% | Percentile76.19% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelNR | Score83.19% | Percentile71.43% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAC | Score82.00% | Percentile66.67% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelMI | Score81.30% | Percentile61.90% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelAC | Score80.80% | Percentile57.14% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelGO | Score80.60% | Percentile52.38% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelMA | Score76.80% | Percentile47.62% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelMA | Score75.30% | Percentile42.86% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelIB | Score74.40% | Percentile38.10% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelAC | Score72.90% | Percentile33.33% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelGO | Score71.70% | Percentile28.57% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank17 | ModelGO | Score71.70% | Percentile23.81% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank18 | ModelMI | Score68.50% | Percentile19.05% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank19 | ModelMI | Score67.00% | Percentile14.29% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank20 | ModelGO | Score66.80% | Percentile9.52% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank21 | ModelGO | Score66.80% | Percentile4.76% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank22 | ModelBA | Score51.30% | Percentile0.00% | Participants22 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What Winogrande measures and how its scores work.
Winogrande is an adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge dataset that uses adversarial filtering to reduce spurious biases.
It measures performance on pronoun resolution problems requiring commonsense reasoning, reported as Score in ratio units.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Winogrande.
GPT-4 is currently ranked first with 87.50%.
The current leaders are GPT-4 (87.50%), MiMo-V2.5-Pro (85.60%), and Command R+ (85.40%).
Phi 4 Mini has the lowest matched official input price at $0.08 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are GPT-4 (104.00 tok/s via Azure), Command R+ (59.00 tok/s via Cohere), and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct (44.00 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance on pronoun resolution problems requiring commonsense reasoning, reported as Score in ratio units.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
22 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis winogrande AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
GPT-4 currently leads Winogrande with 87.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.